0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
tm, it's funny how your numbers bounce around - 700,000 then 600,000, even early reports were saying 150,000 to 250,000 (and you know how early reports are more often than not exaggerated). Now, do you really believe that someone stacking bodies is going to know the difference between 40,000 and 600,000? I really doubt it (it would just become a blur long before those numbers were reached). Amazing though that Vonnegut survived unscathed when, according to you, more than half of the population of the city was incinerated. And, as for you suggestion that I go into a bar and ask, I must say that your scientific methodology is interesting. Is that where you get your "facts"?
Casull; Indeed, the numbers did seem a bit exaggerated...so I did a bit of checking. Here is what a German research team found after a long and thorough investigation.. Der Spiegel is a not a "conspiracy" type publication. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,581992,00.html
They all pale in comparison to what's looming on the horizon. I expect the death toll to be in the billions world wide when this "new world order" takes over. Closer to home here I fully expect that 40 million figure to look small.The folks bringing you this new world order are I believe hoping for an 85% to 90% reduction in the human species.
Quote from: Graybeard on September 01, 2009, 11:44:44 AMThey all pale in comparison to what's looming on the horizon. I expect the death toll to be in the billions world wide when this "new world order" takes over. Closer to home here I fully expect that 40 million figure to look small.The folks bringing you this new world order are I believe hoping for an 85% to 90% reduction in the human species.I find it odd that the eliteist liberals that see themselves running this new world order don't includethemselves or their famlies in the 85% to 90% reduction. They only want useful idiots who don't question authority. Robert