Author Topic: Hollowpointer/Accurizer Ammunition Report  (Read 1587 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Joshua M. Smith

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 88
Hollowpointer/Accurizer Ammunition Report
« on: November 14, 2009, 10:43:56 PM »
A while back I bought a hollowpointer/accurizer tool manufactured by D Rock at Rimfire Central.  There were doubts expressed as to whether the modified bullets would perform.

I ran a 100 yard test.  However, before we get to that test, let me walk you through the process of making the ammo.


Here are the components to the hollowpointer...

Fairly simple setup, but precise.


The first step is to put the round in the bottom block.


Assemble, and put on some sort of press - even a hammer will work.


Pull the handle...


... and a gaping hollowpoint (depending on depth settings) results.

But how do they perform?

They do shoot more accurately than unmodified ammo, but to the same point of aim.  This is probably because they've been set to a standard size, and because the center of mass is further back.  This is speculation however.  I just know it works!

I set up four water jugs at 100 yards, and fired into them.

These are the results:


This is the first jug.  It's pretty well shredded.


A line of all four jugs...


Here's a bullet I recovered from right beyond the fourth jug...


Two more stopped inside the fourth jug.

I believe the variation in penetration is due to the fact that I fired 10 rounds, and kept firing after the jugs were pretty well empty.  I tried this test before with three jugs and failed to recover any.  I therefore added a fourth jug and kept firing until empty to try to get a few decent samples.


This is a picture of the unmodified round, modified round, and the three bullets I was able to recover.

Keep in mind that this is CCI 40gn LRN I modified.  Their website lists the velocities thus:

Muzzle 1235     

50 yards 1092     

75 yards 1040     

100 yards 998

So, when the bullet impacted, it was acting as a heavy .22 short.  Yet, it still expanded to over .36".

These are doing better than my old standby, Winchester Xpert, and are of course more consistent.

I'm impressed.

Josh <><

Offline 3leggedturtle

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 209
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hollowpointer/Accurizer Ammunition Report
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2009, 01:56:58 PM »
Thats a great report. How long does it take you to do a box of 50 shells.  What did  the tool cost? Do you have a link to it?  3leg

Offline Doe

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 217
Re: Hollowpointer/Accurizer Ammunition Report
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2009, 06:34:05 AM »
Dang it makes me wanting to get one of those tool. Very good report there friend  ;).

Offline fr3db3ar

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 251
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hollowpointer/Accurizer Ammunition Report
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2009, 07:01:41 AM »
I have one as well that I use to make CCI SV (which my guns like and I like to shoot) in HP for small game hunting.  I have yet to recover a bullet though.....they still pass through as they rip their heads off.
Aim Small, Miss Small

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!

When they come for your guns, give them the ammo first.

Offline Joshua M. Smith

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 88
Re: Hollowpointer/Accurizer Ammunition Report
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2009, 08:49:56 AM »
Thats a great report. How long does it take you to do a box of 50 shells.  What did  the tool cost? Do you have a link to it?  3leg


Hello,

A box of 50 takes maybe 10 minutes.  I do 100 in half an hour.

http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/vbclassified.php?do=ad&id=16162 should get you to where they're at.

Josh <><