Author Topic: 125gr 30-30 vs 357 mag  (Read 1848 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 277284

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 144
125gr 30-30 vs 357 mag
« on: November 17, 2009, 08:19:19 PM »
How does the 125gr hp 30-30 compare to the 357 mag in leverguns?

Offline Bob A

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 122
Re: 125gr 30-30 vs 357 mag
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2009, 05:40:10 AM »
How does the 125gr hp 30-30 compare to the 357 mag in leverguns?

This is a hard question to answer. It would help if you gave a clue. What is it you want to compare? Range? Accuracy? Killing Power? Cost of ammo? Ease of reloading?

I will start but may be off the mark.
The 125 Federal 30-30 round (or handloads using the Sierra 125 HP) are very good hunting rounds. The HP is not a frangible bullet. It is pretty tough and opens nicely. However, the ballistic coefficient of the Sierra 125 HP is not good. So the bullet looses velocity quickly. Also, at only 125 grains, it is not a great penetrator. But for deer size (or smaller) animals at range out to 150 yards, it is a very good round.
The 30-30 is easy to load and there is very good data available for the Sierra 125.

You don't specify a load for the 357 mag, so its hard to compare, but I would not recommend 125 gr bullets in a 357 levergun. Most 357 mag rifles shoot better with heavier/longer bullets.  Hunting range with a 357 levergun is comparable to the 30-30 with the 125 Sierra. 30-30 range will be much better with other loads but loaded with the 125HP, it is very similar to the 357 loaded with 158 gr bullets.

Recoil is similar but the 357 is likely a bit lighter.
The 357 can get good performance with shorter barrels, giving it a potential advantage if you like the "handiness" of a short carbine.
The 357 is also easy to reload.

So, thats a start. Maybe others will fill in the gaps

Bob A

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: 125gr 30-30 vs 357 mag
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2009, 07:29:31 AM »
Bob, in my opinion is pretty close on his analysis of both. I have been shooting a 3030 for 51 years, and the 357 mag 39 years. I have been reloading them both since 1971, and have pretty much tried every bullet available, including cast, and cast with a gas check, in both rounds.
The 125 grain in 3030 I consider a waste of the 3030 range potential by cutting off about a 100 yards of range by stepping down to that weight. I prefer the 150 grain, and a 250 yard kill shot on a deer is not a big deal for the 3030 and the 150 grain bullet. Some like the 170 better, and if I were doing elk, I would too.
The 125 grain jhp in the 357 magnum is going to in a normal loading out of a rifle be scorching in velocity, and on a deer sized animal depending on the bullet might come apart. Remember, it is a pistol bullet. I prefer the 158 grain jacketed SOFT POINT, at 2000fps, and like Bob said, at 150 yards DEAD DEER.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett