Author Topic: US Troops Adopt UN Colors...towards NWO (Read 1333 times)

TM7 · « **on:** November 18, 2009, 05:19:30 AM »

In this regard, it makes absolutely no difference whether a Republican or Democratic President sits in the Oval Office. President Barack Obama is pushing forward with the same internationalist policies as did his predecessors, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George Herbert Walker Bush. (And, no, Martha, nothing would have changed had John McCain been elected last year.)....Rev Chuck Baldwin

http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/chuckwagon.php

Non-elected reps, CFR, military policy, NAFTA....all undermine sovereignty of the United States....don't ask how, what, why; don't even bother getting nostalgic over what was.... just smell the coffee.

fyi...TM7

dukkillr · « **Reply #1 on:** November 18, 2009, 12:09:52 PM »

Isn't there a more appropriate section here at GBO for these things?

Swampman · « **Reply #2 on:** November 18, 2009, 12:17:24 PM »

Keep your eye on Rome.

teamnelson · « **Reply #3 on:** November 18, 2009, 12:36:26 PM »

I had the evil eye of fatima, a pre-Islamic pagan symbol adopted by Mohammed's follower as a symbol of evil, in bright communist red as my unit patch during the Cold War. The cojoined upper and lower triangles, one upward in the same manner as the Great Pyramid, long associated with the Illuminati, and the lower pointing downwards in the symbol long associated with gender ambivalence. We were told it was just a Red Diamond.

Yes, I'm having fun with it, is all. No intention of hurting feelings.

Seriously though, if the implications of this are true, what is your proposed course of action to stop it?

bearmgc · « **Reply #4 on:** November 18, 2009, 04:53:28 PM »

You musta been in a crazy mixed up battalion. Mine had just primary colors in a plain ol triangle. We were just simple soldiers....

rex6666 · « **Reply #5 on:** November 19, 2009, 07:24:53 AM »

Quote from: TM7 on November 19, 2009, 06:40:37 AM

Reverand Baldwin is referencing Dr Jerome Corsi's article at worldnetdaily...Corsi being the famous Kerry swiftboat writer. As any learned individual knows designs on patchs, currency, coat of arms, insignias, etc. don't mean a gosh durn thing and certainly not symbolic of any meaning, mission or representing any thing ... Such designs usually are only just somebody's fantasy sketchs, perhaps picked out in a contest...maybe even Agnes down in motorpool designed this North COM patch based on something she saw in a cartoon.... Since the dawn of civilization mankind has never resorted to symbolism, visual symbolism, to convey and bind ideas (like crosses and the like)....the human mind doesn't work like that....does it?...

The aforemention SPP with a 30 businessman committee is just a golf clique. CFR, Bilderberger, The Fed, Trialaterialist, Agenda 21, Rio Agreement, etc. don't really exist. Everything is as it always was. Now go back to sleep.

If true...first proposed actions is for others to become aware. 2nd proposed action is governmental reform as per another thread here. 3rd action is no more secrecy in government...."Democracy ends where secrecy begins"...I think we all know who said that. 4th action is to stop funding this and crap like this and those that are involved in it can go out get a real job.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Swampie/dukkilr....are we to take your ambivilance and sarcasm as indication it is OK for US forces to merge with UN police/military objectives and forces...?

..TM7

i think they are trying nicely to say IS TM7 for real.

teamnelson · « **Reply #6 on:** November 19, 2009, 07:36:39 AM »

The patch is real, and NORTHCOM is real ... that it snuggles up and spoons posse comitatus is unnerving to me at least. That we have a shared security agreement with Canada is unnerving ... I think its hilarious that they're launching a pogrom up North over who knew what about torture of Afghan prisoners at the hands of the Afghan government. What was their other option? But I digress ...

TM7 is correct that visual symbols have been important, but stop a soldier on the street, any one you find, and unless they're in the 82nd or 101st they will most likely have no clue of the heraldry behind the crest on their sleeve.

People are freaking out over the Navy's use of the term "global" in its new motto ... Marines have had a globe in our symbol since the 18th century indicating "world wide service" - every Marine knows that.

teamnelson · « **Reply #7 on:** November 19, 2009, 12:36:55 PM »

TM7 so who is supposed to get it? And why?

And again, if the implications suggested are true, what are you going to do about it?

Mohawk · « **Reply #8 on:** November 19, 2009, 12:49:01 PM »

Great, the world is now getting it's news from Art Bell's "Coast to Coast".

Mohawk · « **Reply #9 on:** November 19, 2009, 02:24:41 PM »

Yes, the color of uniform patches seems to have slipped past my radar, don't tell the colleges about their school colors, or for that matter, any of the 200 plus units of the US armed forces. And don't tell the military that Russia's and France's colors are also red, white, and blue among other nations. I'm still waiting for the ice age that's two years past due. It doesn't matter though, the end of the Mayan calendar is coming to an end in 2012 so everything else is futile. I still feel jaded that the "hurricane disaster" season to be followed by a "weather invasion" the next year, was zero hurricanes this season in my area. TM7, is right, I don't "git it". But when George or Art Bell presents a better argument, and WRONG, I have to ask where is your evidence?

teamnelson · « **Reply #10 on:** November 19, 2009, 02:49:49 PM »

TM7, ahhh ... the proverbial appeal to the rationality of mankind through the proliferation of TRUTH. You've chosen the long war my friend, and sadly just when you get a few to listen, a new lie will need revealing. I applaud your diligence in the face of adversity - to sacrifice "face" in the pursuit of a noble cause is a worthy use of life.

I think things are much much worse than whether or not the US is moving towards unification with North America and the UN, so forgive me if I seem less concerned. There are larger forces afoot, and my action is to strengthen those who are most able to act.

jrnsuz · « **Reply #11 on:** November 19, 2009, 03:02:13 PM »

TeamNelson, who would "those most able to act" be? And are they on my side? I have yet to see them

teamnelson · « **Reply #12 on:** November 19, 2009, 03:10:47 PM »

The dopes behind the rifles ... the best our nation has to offer in my opinion. I didn't come back in for politics; I came back in because what I can do best is best suited for them. And yes, they will be on your side when it comes down to it.

Mohawk · « **Reply #13 on:** November 20, 2009, 05:47:27 AM »

I was replying to the topic. Anyone ever notice a complete spectrum of colors on soldier's uniform patches? I highly doubt that there is a conspiracy of the Army Calvary only supporting the Pittsburgh Steelers due to the colors of their unit patches. Symbolism not only symbolizes objectives it also makes for great fiction.

teamnelson · « **Reply #14 on:** November 20, 2009, 08:41:22 AM »

TM7, my sincerity did not come through ... I understand what you are about and applaud. I personally lack your patience, but I value it all the same.

The collapse of the USA will throw the planet into a dark age of ideas. A strong idle country gives opportunity for great minds to explore great ideas. In a free marketplace of ideas, truth rises to the top.

Oldshooter · « **Reply #15 on:** November 20, 2009, 09:14:48 AM »

Quote from: Mohawk on November 19, 2009, 12:49:01 PM

Great, the world is now getting it's news from Art Bell's "Coast to Coast".

BBF · « **Reply #16 on:** November 20, 2009, 02:27:00 PM »

TM7 A bit of sarcasm I believe

nomosendero · « **Reply #17 on:** November 22, 2009, 07:33:23 AM »

Quote from: TM7 on November 18, 2009, 05:19:30 AM

In this regard, it makes absolutely no difference whether a Republican or Democratic President sits in the Oval Office. President Barack Obama is pushing forward with the same internationalist policies as did his predecessors, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George Herbert Walker Bush. (And, no, Martha, nothing would have changed had John McCain been elected last year.)....Rev Chuck Baldwin

http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/chuckwagon.php

Non-elected reps, CFR, military policy, NAFTA....all undermine sovereignty of the United States....don't ask how, what, why; don't even bother getting nostalgic over what was.... just smell the coffee.

fyi...TM7

If it doesn't matter who, then it won't get worse now, we will see!!

teamnelson · « **Reply #18 on:** November 23, 2009, 06:25:45 AM »

I got the Who ... it's the fallen nature of mankind active in everyone. Some have greater material resources than others but even their victims are selfish and greedy.

nomosendero · « **Reply #19 on:** November 23, 2009, 11:59:20 AM »

Quote from: TM7 on November 23, 2009, 02:18:48 AM

Quote from: nomosendero on November 22, 2009, 07:33:23 AM
Quote from: TM7 on November 18, 2009, 05:19:30 AM
In this regard, it makes absolutely no difference whether a Republican or Democratic President sits in the Oval Office. President Barack Obama is pushing forward with the same internationalist policies as did his predecessors, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George Herbert Walker Bush. (And, no, Martha, nothing would have changed had John McCain been elected last year.)....Rev Chuck Baldwin

http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/chuckwagon.php

Non-elected reps, CFR, military policy, NAFTA....all undermine sovereignty of the United States....don't ask how, what, why; don't even bother getting nostalgic over what was.... just smell the coffee.

fyi...TM7

If it doesn't matter who, then it won't get worse now, we will see!!
.
...Its all about Who, isn't it? Once you get the 'who' down you're on the path.

..TM7

Ah yea

Squib · « **Reply #20 on:** November 23, 2009, 09:55:19 PM »

the un is communist but conniving, every nation in that group is just in a power struggle with each other... think about it

I don't doubt their intentions I doubt their ability to make a power grab without freaking people out of complacency

also, as soon as the un got REAL power to do more than attempt to pull strings (usually just stirring up more conflict) and take over some countries outright, the members would all fight it out to get top dog status within the un

think about it, russia couldn't even keep the warsaw pact nations in check... because communism always goes back to fuedalism (king state actually has a king and king has fuedal lords and those lords have vassals, and they ALL want to stab each other in the back)

that's why I like capitalism, you don't have to kill or be killed, just work till you have enough money to be content, yeah some people are cutthroat about it but they have to spend all that money somewhere

and no I'm not wealthy, I barely make more than minimum wage (under 30K for sure, va disability checks and full-time plus overtime work)

long story short the un can't really take over the us, but it can screw this country up worse (then again the progressives did in the early 1900's and the backlash was able to straighten america back out for the most part)

Elijah Gunn · « **Reply #21 on:** November 24, 2009, 03:47:40 PM »

Quote from: TeamNelson on November 20, 2009, 08:41:22 AM

TM7, I understand what you are about and applaud. I personally lack your patience, but I value it all the same.

Yeah! What he said! You sure have grit, and pluck TM7.

Squib · « **Reply #22 on:** November 24, 2009, 08:54:26 PM »

I'm not being sarcastic (maybe dumb)

what's the grit and pluck comment about? is that australian or british ebonics/slang?

nw_hunter · « **Reply #23 on:** November 25, 2009, 04:40:31 AM »

Quote from: Squib on November 24, 2009, 08:54:26 PM

I'm not being sarcastic (maybe dumb)

what's the grit and pluck comment about? is that australian or british ebonics/slang?

I don't know about the grit and pluck, but what TM7 has is, common sense, and the desire to use it.
It appears some on this forum, think the formation of the North American Union, is no big deal, and we have bigger fish to fry. They are doing away with the sovereignty of this nation, and when that is gone, and we have no borders, the constitution will be completely shredded What will we have left that once resembled the USA?

Squib · « **Reply #24 on:** November 25, 2009, 01:18:11 PM »

it's a tough decision:

isolationism and the death of free trade would slow the bleed on american wealth (though we're not on top anymore and probably won't be again.. it's too late for that) but would also stop the erosion of us sovereignty (my biggest concern)
it would also make it possible to break free of china (not gonna happen though, it just won't)

or we have free trade (sort of, we still have tariffs and "manufacturing" standards) and capitalism, but our borders are at stake

neither is evil/corrupt/wrong on principle it's how they're used

the problem is that communism wins by economics (assuming stupid people vote for it during a time of depression, which is the whole world right now COPENHAGEN) they make money through artificial regulation for awhile but it depletes the source of wealth (free trade) so they milk that more through careful regulation... then the money is all gone and a totalitarian militant government doesn't worry about money it's just bullying people into action

wealth is cyclical just like the seasons, if we keep trying to stop natural recession it just comes back later and much worse (like right now)
what's hard to understand about that? don't blame congress, blame dumb voters and the media

Elijah Gunn · « **Reply #25 on:** November 26, 2009, 01:19:37 AM »

Quote from: Squib on November 24, 2009, 08:54:26 PM

I'm not being sarcastic (maybe dumb)

what's the grit and pluck comment about? is that australian or british ebonics/slang?

I probably should have used the word tenacity.

TM7 brings a lot of opinions, and info here that he gets flamed on pretty bad, but it just does not stop him. Gotta respect that, especially since he mostly keeps his cool in response to them. However, I don't agree with everything he says.

Squib · « **Reply #26 on:** November 26, 2009, 01:37:47 AM »

I think team Nelson is more correct about the phenomena than the rest of us (we're arguing mechanics)

materialism is breaking us all

gypsyman · « **Reply #27 on:** November 26, 2009, 02:33:05 AM »

It's the camel's nose under the tent addage. A little here, and a little there. I heard guys back in the late '80's predicting this. The John Birch Society has been warning of this since Kennedy was president. It's all about money. The UN hasn't done a damn thing to help this country, just suck up more tax dollars. gypsyman

Squib · « **Reply #28 on:** November 26, 2009, 02:37:40 AM »

it has to get worse before it gets better

people aren't going to fight until they have to, social upheaval is costly and from what I've heard there aren't great retirement benefits for the trouble. maybe better than trillions of debt though, guess we'll see when the house of cards comes down on us

in the meantime, start mapping caves/speelunking (however that's spelled) because it's working overseas (but I live close to whiteman AFB, more bombs and all so it won't work for me)

Yankee1 · « **Reply #29 on:** November 26, 2009, 12:05:27 PM »

Hello Everyone
Do you really believe that we should kill the messenger?
Someone has been pulling the strings of our puppet presidents for sometime. The goal is one world government. I personally do not care if you believe me or not but I would strongly suggest that you use your computers to look up the Rothschild family and read a couple of pages. If you control the money you can control the politicians.
There are secret organizations in this world that desire to control all of its wealth. To do so they must control the people that run things..
If you start by reading about the Rothschild family you will be starting to understand the secret organizations from the top down.
If after reading what I have recommended you wish to know more I would suggest looking up the "Illuminati" and if by chance any one may care to understand more look up "Bilderburgers".
There is much more but the afore mentioned should provide insight to some of the problems our nation faces today.
Thank you TM7 for bringing these things to our attention.
Yankee1