Author Topic: Glenn Beck Hammers Them Again..and ..Again! (Read 2253 times)

Redtail1949 · « **on:** November 23, 2009, 12:44:26 PM »

watched him this afternoon..exposing the a$%454 on global warming fraud. Someone got the emails of the so called scientist and they reveal they have been covering up the facts. Beck is going to make them eat it.

then he mention the New York Times Article Today that was saying that we might want to take another look at what we are doing to the economy..they stated that the interest on the debt will before long be more than all the money spent on Iraq, Afganistan, Health Care, Bailouts, Tarp, and Cap and Trade Combined...that will be every years payment on the debt I repeat every years payment on the debt. they stated that it would be impossible to do that and that it endangered America to maje it a real possibility of TOTAL COLLAPASE OF THE ECONOMY!

WOWO--WOW they woke up....Glen Beck pointed out that he had been warning of that since August 6, 2009 and playey the tape whewre he had said it. Like he said THEY JUST NOW ARE WORRIED?

If we the people do not stop these fools you better keep your guns close at hand.

hillbill · « **Reply #1 on:** November 23, 2009, 01:11:25 PM »

glen gets a little excited sometimes, and yes he is usually correct on his facts. however he is only telling us what WE already know. the libs, global warming freeks and the rest of the nuts aint listening and never will.the facts have always shown that global warming is a scam and nobody seems to care.liberals and facts are like oil and water, they just dont mix well

bilmac · « **Reply #2 on:** November 23, 2009, 01:22:26 PM »

If Glen B was just talking to guys who inhabit this web site then he is just preaching to the choir, but the viewership of Fox News is growing by leaps and bounds, and the polls are starting to turn. Maybe there is hope.

ironglow · « **Reply #3 on:** November 23, 2009, 01:25:05 PM »

here's the straight dope, guys http://www.aim.org/aim-column/andrew-revkin-spins-climategate-story/

Read the article, but be sure to go to the 5th paragraph and read what the actual E-mails say (click on blue letters).

ms · « **Reply #4 on:** November 23, 2009, 01:33:46 PM »

The last two days Alex Jones has been all over this.

gypsyman · « **Reply #5 on:** November 23, 2009, 03:51:06 PM »

I first started setting up at gun shows in late 1985. I had met several members of an organization called APRA.(American Rifle and Pistol Assoc.) They were warning of a new world order back then. Kept handing out literature about getting out of the U.N.(as well as the John Bircher's), and what this govt. was leading to. Most everbody thought they were on the loose side. If those 2 guys I knew were still alive,(both died by '90) they'd both be telling everbody I told ya so. gypsyman

Squib · « **Reply #6 on:** November 27, 2009, 09:06:35 PM »

good point hill bill, they're a bunch of lemmings

Cabin4 · « **Reply #7 on:** November 28, 2009, 04:46:30 AM »

The whole global warming thing is just another example of a conspiracy put together by the super rich and influential of the Eco Nazi crowd supported by the corporate powers that will benefit from resulting legislation and as TM put it, the newest religion. As usual with any leftist cause, the main stream media are right there as their willing accomplices to the conspiracy.

The global warming concept is slowly but for sure unraveling on these people People who know better will only be shut down for so long. The sad fact, is that there could be some good outcome from a “greener” approach. I support efforts to reduce or eliminate oil imports which a greener approach would bring. The problem with the Eco Nazi’s running the Green agenda, is they have boxed in all the green efforts. In order for us to be greener and reduce oil imports, we must expand and or improve technology in the following areas:

1.   Hydro Thermal
2.   Wind
3.   Solar
4.   Water/dams
5.   Ocean current & wave generation
6.   Drill domestically
7.   Invest in upgrading our electrical supply & grid which includes building more coal & gas plants (make electricity cheaper)
8.   Incent the purchase of hybrid and electrical vehicles (requires item 6)
9.   Upgrade our cargo rail lines
10.   Further develop the natural gas option for vehicle use
11. Corn oil

For nearly every one of the items above, there is an Eco Nazi group in strong opposition that’s either making progress slow and or outright preventing the expansion or development because of what they see as an environmental back lash. So in the meantime, we as average Americans just get to suffer and send our son’s overseas to die to ensure our ME oil supply continues. And as another casualty, our environment and pocket books suffer as corporations are forced to move production and jobs overseas.

All thanks to sick bastards like Al Gore and the rest of his Eco Nazi terrorists.

BBF · « **Reply #8 on:** November 28, 2009, 06:48:00 AM »

I'm trying to see any similarity of eco and nazi...............

The later word being one of Beck's favorites. I keep thinking he has to use that word a certain number of times as a quota from higher ups

Squib · « **Reply #9 on:** November 28, 2009, 10:36:36 AM »

hitler and some of his lieutenants were very eco-conscious (yes they scorched the earth to establish the third reich but AFTER killing off the allies they really were going to pursue the tree-hugging), some of them were vegetarians (himmler I think, plus hitler, HATED meat and thought it was barbaric- after ww2 they wanted to outlaw it), they were all about living off REAL food (no argument on whole/natural food from me) and they wanted to use spiritual medicine much, much more than scientific "western medicine". hitler was deep in the "new age" stuff and really did intend to push it, but his bid for world power got going WAY too fast and he couldn't keep up, cried like a little girl in his bunker for awhile, and killed himself.

any lie perpetrated by the elite to control society is nwo and differentiating between nazism/corporatism/socialism/fascism/progressivism is hard to do, I prefer any and all terms with an insidious connotation

I'm not calling you out bbf, just asking "what's the difference"? obama won't get involved in the pledge of allegiance so you know he's not likely to throw out an arm and scream zeig heil either

Squib · « **Reply #10 on:** November 28, 2009, 11:55:13 AM »

yeah, his mentality was

we'll step up as the righteous and clean in the world, we just gotta get rid of the other guys because they're in our way

it's the same as free will from a christian perspective- we cannot be judged as decent and wholesome if we are lemings. god preferred men to angels as I recall that's what got satan so angry. no sheep that follow blindly have real character or strength of character. forcing someone else to be perfect will take an incentive- an incentive of pain,shame,fear of death... it's impossible to coerce "righteousness" without being quite evil once the coercion goes beyond simply arguing (that being said- I'm still pro death penalty because I don't like the cancer spreading when pedophiles, gang-bangers and such are involved and that makes me a hypocrite)

briarpatch · « **Reply #11 on:** November 28, 2009, 12:58:10 PM »

Some would have to Glenn credit for the 9/12 project. It not only woke me up but got me involved.
Not saying he is right in all things. Not saying he is the savior of mankind. I will say if anyone dont think he is trying why dont you get out and lead us into the sunset.
Politics is a most complicted thing from what I am beginning to see. It is hard to get everyone onboard. Most just set around and arm chair quarterback.
I would be glad to help any here that is willing to lead or do what he is doing better.

Squib · « **Reply #12 on:** November 28, 2009, 01:37:29 PM »

the only people I send money to is the NRA and I'm not totally sure they're always honest.. anyone ever track their money? I've not got any particularly good leads on them. other than the bradys always complaining I haven't heard anything bad about the nra.

ironglow · « **Reply #13 on:** November 28, 2009, 11:02:42 PM »

BBF;
Surely you jest..clearly Beck is not saying that "eco" equals Nazi. Beck's thrust, even though it is abrupt or even laced with wry humor (as with the lederhosen), was to easily illustrate the tactics aimed at political advantage as they were practiced by the Third Reich and today's liberals. There are many similarities...
It was not long ago when Rahm Emanuel, one of the leading mavens of the radical left said , "never allow a good crisis to go to waste". We know from experience, that the radical left is not above "manufacturing a crisis" in order to move a pet agenda and noty giving a hoot who it it hurts or destroys. Their manufactured crisis over ALAR, the shiny finish added to apples before being shipped to retail outlets. The finish, later proved harmless, was accused of costing many lives (while it cost none), was the object of one manufgactured crisis. Apple sales dropped and many family owned farms for 4-5 generations were bankrupted. Did the liberals care? ...*&$%#@ NO ! Bodies must sometimes fall..it is part of the liberal "Kampf".
As many here have said, religion and faith move men best..for good or bad, and would be tyrants know this well. Plain politics cannot move men to euphoria and martyrdom..there must be an underlying "faith".. Each "church" has it's own faith, dogma, fundamentals and beliefs, doctrines, music, saints and sinners. Let us compare the Christian Church with the Nazi "church" and the "church" of radical liberalism.

Christian church Nazi "church" "church" of the radical left

Their God Father, Son & Holy Spirit Hitler Darwin
#1 doctrine "In the beginning God created" "mein fuhrer uber alles" "Darwin uber alles"

Saints the saved, for some, Goebbels, Goering, Hoess, Carl Sagan, Margaret Sanger,
or selected devouts (for others). Margaret Sanger, etc. Rachel Carson, Che Guvera

A Marching song "At Calvary" "The Horst Wessel" "If I had a Hammer" & etc.

Martyrs Huss, Pieter De Brus etc. Horst Wessel Lennon, Brockovich, Roe (was)

Points of faith Five fundamentals Super race God is not God, nature rules

The enemy Satan The Jews Christians

Guidebook Bible "Mein Kampf" Communist Manifesto, etc

By now I think you get the the idea...I could go on , but no need..

Squib · « **Reply #14 on:** November 29, 2009, 12:04:18 AM »

they don't care about the people they harm because they care about the collective
they don't want us to vote, have guns, no personal property, no capital to challenge their dominance
and definitely not a god- unless that deity is the "god-state" of christian socialism

1930's progressivism (or was it twenties?)

do you really think that hitler was given free reign to terrorize and conquer just to be cornered later? sounds risky- then again it is strange that he beat down almost ALL of europe and then lost after he destroyed the infrastructure.... where did those reparations go by the way? oh and he made a second bid for power and succeeded again, temporarily

and hitler was REALLY concerned with the occult too- this red shield conspiracy stuff goes deep!!!
speaking of was the us directed by the puppeteers to move in and take over as the sole superpower or did they corrupt the us after the fact???

tm7, bbf-

remember I just got turned on to the red shields about two days ago so that layer of it all is still new to me

BBF · « **Reply #15 on:** November 29, 2009, 01:33:26 PM »

IG

Lets simplify my previous post. The expression "eco nazi" was my main point. I can't see the realtionship of those two words.

As far as Beck stirring up the masses etc, I'm all for it. His repeated use of the word nazi or the name Hitler makes me think that Hollywood and the Zionist propaganda got to him as well, unless of course he does have a quota

Squib · « **Reply #16 on:** November 29, 2009, 01:49:55 PM »

but him saying nazi all the time might get people to look it all up and look at the source incidentally

some people might take the incidental connection as a reason to read up more... sure the nazis were evil but why bring up a dead movement unless it's not dead (and then they look at the american progressive philosophy of the god state)

the eco part ... I'm a meat and potatos kind of person so I don't like vegetarian/scrawny/bent-wrist types, maybe that's part of the image of the counter-culture that is being pressed and not much more? maybe the red shields don't want people to stop butchering animals because then the people can't butcher each other, and the jewry pulling the strings in hollywood do need that kosher beef

speaking of, why is hunting some sort of "hic" pasttime and worthy of insult from the media, when jews will slash a cows throat- a rabbi does it! shooting deer is inhumane (but quick) but slashing living throats is humane.... sorry bbf I just brought up more questions

Casull · « **Reply #17 on:** November 29, 2009, 02:13:56 PM »

Quote

do you really think that hitler was given free reign to terrorize and conquer just to be cornered later? sounds risky-

To most it sounds incredibly risky. But to tm7, it's just another example of the great jewish conspiracy.

Squib · « **Reply #18 on:** November 29, 2009, 02:39:10 PM »

my question isn't whether or not the red shields did in fact fund the repulsion of the nazis (twice)

it's whether or not they're really out to ruin the world, or if their investments grow malevolent due to human nature (they buy favor and not results, politicians give orders but don't execute them, soldiers and civilians are the executive among us and that's where the good or evil is contained... the people above are just debating ideas in the ivory tower... strangely they've never invited me so I don't really know what's going on but it's all dirty for sure)

Cabin4 · « **Reply #19 on:** November 29, 2009, 03:47:38 PM »

Quote from: BBF on November 29, 2009, 01:33:26 PM

IG
Lets simplify my previous post. The expression "eco nazi" was my main point. I can't see the realtionship of those two words.

They are ecologists that are willing to use all means (like the Nazi's) to justify what they want in the end. This countries energy policies have been hijacked by the varying eco nazi's. There are eco nazi nich groups all over our damn country, each with a narrow focus against one form of alternative energy. As an example, thre are groups specificlaly opposed to wind power, one specifcially opposed to hydro, etc.

ironglow · « **Reply #20 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:59:55 AM »

to clarify my post #15, the web did it's magic and mixed up my post to the point where it may be difficult to understand. The post had 4 columns..first column, subject ....2nd column,m Christian view.... 3rd column, Nazi view....4th column, Socialist view. Unfortunately, posting the message sent the Socialist view back under
the subject column.

Questor · « **Reply #21 on:** November 30, 2009, 06:09:58 AM »

Does Glen Beck have any credibility? I've heard his radio show and he just seems like a hysterical doomsayer to me. I don't listen to it anymore.

Squib · « **Reply #22 on:** November 30, 2009, 07:15:19 AM »

he goes off on liberal stupidity, always making fun of them and their duplistic ideals that are WAY too rediculous to ever work (like giving an all powerful government the power to make everything fair)

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #23 on:** November 30, 2009, 07:33:33 AM »

He flirts with the truth for sure but it must be considered that he is an entertainer and after ratings in the end . To think he would be on any show for the good of man alone is folly really. He has hit on a mix that puts riches in his pocket and the owners also. One must conclude he is good at making money , as to influnceing the voters his track record says no . But then he may achieve that also in 2010.
Has anyone else noticed the libs use movies ,TV shows and such while cons. use direct talk shows ? sort of fanisty vs reality . Guess the libs pay to be influnced .

Cabin4 · « **Reply #24 on:** November 30, 2009, 08:14:12 AM »

Quote from: SHOOTALL on November 30, 2009, 07:33:33 AM

He flirts with the truth for sure .

The main stream media does this constantly so why should Beck not? At least Beck presents most of his stuff as "questions". The main stream media presents so called facts. Have a listen to KPFA on the FM radio dial or MSNBC cable news and you will get a taste of liberal lies to the greatest degree. They come across as a reputable news organization nice and calm. Mostly all freakin lies and half truths but because they present in a nice calm assumingly reputable way, dumb people believe their trash.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #25 on:** November 30, 2009, 08:24:52 AM »

Cabin4 , that's my point its show biz first and fore most on either side . They all do it ! Shame really !

BBF · « **Reply #26 on:** November 30, 2009, 12:24:58 PM »

Cabin 4" I got it.

bearmgc · « **Reply #27 on:** November 30, 2009, 03:50:57 PM »

I like Glenn Beck, but what he is doing with his fame is starting to bug me. I saw an advertisement for Glenn Beck, coming to a theatre hall near you. He is now promoting himself as a motivational speaker, talking about his life, and making a pretty penny doing it. So the view of him as an "entertainer" is accurate.

Squib · « **Reply #28 on:** November 30, 2009, 07:37:24 PM »

does he remind anyone here of ann coulter?

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #29 on:** December 01, 2009, 01:57:16 AM »

Bill O , said the same basic thing last night on his show - all media has to make money . Nothing wrong with that really . We as a people need to realize that fact . As far as Glen B goes good for him he is making a good living and for the smart people he brings issues out in the open . It is up to us to find all the facts and decide what is right and wrong not follow him or others like sheep .