Author Topic: Only Sarah could have said it! (Read 2314 times)

blind ear · « **Reply #30 on:** November 25, 2009, 04:10:54 AM »

Jimster, +1, the sooner TSHTF the sooner people will move. Nothing the voters can do has changed anything. Nothing ever changes until the general public is starving or bleeding. It scares me though. eddiegjr

blind ear · « **Reply #31 on:** November 25, 2009, 05:19:16 AM »

The RNC saw her as one that opposed coorportions which are the Republican partys mainstay. (As demonstrated by her actions against big oil, for the good of the people) She is a threat to what the Republican Party is. They just want her to go away. eddiegjr

blind ear · « **Reply #32 on:** November 25, 2009, 06:07:55 AM »

And Sarah has fought them.

Dee · « **Reply #33 on:** November 25, 2009, 06:55:21 AM »

Yes she has.

Squib · « **Reply #34 on:** November 26, 2009, 02:02:16 AM »

personally I like people who'll go for the ideals and tell the party leaders to .. well you know

Sarah Palin and Alan Keyes- I'd like to see those two in office. One controlling the presidental cabinet, military, appointees to the courts and federal posts of all types. The other would be the back-up (don't know why we'd need one though, WE have the guns

and be the president pro tempore- senate boss

and I wouldn't care which was which, it would be great. also they'd be able to carry the minority vote (unlike hilary and obama playing their respective minority cards to get the democratic voters worked up and then the winner takes them all) palin and keyes could just attract the conservative white men by virtue alone, the women independents might like sarah for her soccer mom personality/working class ways and conservative blacks would follow allan because he'd be the first good black candidate in awhile and we'd have quite a good four years barring world war three or a plague (and being a pessimist I'd expect one, something has to go wrong

)

blind ear · « **Reply #35 on:** November 26, 2009, 03:47:53 AM »

TM7, I agree with that (being the best salesman is what they want) and that is what "WE" need to change. As long as we accept the view that we can't change anything, we won't be able to.

As long as we vote thier skewed "one carrot" platform ticket derived to get the most votes and not change anything we will definitely get nothing. All polls reflect what the poller wants it to. The "thinking" of the poller is the same as the party, only the "presentation" by the party is different.

eddiegjr

Rustyinfla · « **Reply #36 on:** November 26, 2009, 03:53:24 AM »

Yep she's easy on the eyes.

She could win in 2012, but then the way Obama is going right now you could run a corpse against him and win.

Squib · « **Reply #37 on:** November 26, 2009, 11:49:35 AM »

speaking of corpses, i was hoping someone would ghost him (I bet I wasn't the only one), but after seeing all the freaks they had lined up to fill the federal beurocracy not to mention biden and pelosi- I'm glad he's still here. He's the only one I can think of that is cautious enough to take a slow advance on his nutty agenda- everyone else wants to go full steam and wreck the this country tomorrow. not that I don't hate him outright but I'm not afraid of the ringmaster, I'm afraid of his clowns

ironglow · « **Reply #38 on:** November 27, 2009, 01:55:18 PM »

Squib;
I sure would like to see a Palin/Keyes ticket, or as some suggested, a Palin/Beck ticket...but we must be realistic, I doubt we can get that much. Of those three names, obviously Palin is the most palatable to most people. For the folks who think she cannot get a v ery big plurality in an election...I believe they are overexercising their "wishful thinking" bone a bit too much..

Squib · « **Reply #39 on:** November 27, 2009, 02:08:50 PM »

the only thing that they have on her is she's not ugly... so she's a barbie doll?

they don't have anything on keyes either (but he's not NEW product)

beck is writing books nonstop so his views are out in the public consciousness.... who else can go with sarah to save the day? keyes is the only one I've researched enough to support (lots of history on that guy) and can't find ties to bs on

Ron Paul maybe?

Dee · « **Reply #40 on:** November 28, 2009, 02:06:31 AM »

Squib, performance records are just that. RECORDS. What "most" folks are trying to tell ya, is that their not votin for anything, "but a sure thing". Their not gonna vote for strict Constitutionalist unless he has one of the two party affiliations, voting "RECORDS" be damned.
They are perfectly "willing", and WILL, vote away theirs, yours, and mine, rights away a little at a time, and justify it all the way, while all the while saying: He or she just didn't have enough support for me to support . I'm gonna vote for this guy BECAUSE, he has more money, and gets his lying message out better on all the media, and HE LIES BETTER. If they need and deserve support because they are HONEST, how do they get support without being supported.

buffgun · « **Reply #41 on:** November 28, 2009, 04:15:46 AM »

Id reather see palin in office than hitlery get it

Dee · « **Reply #42 on:** November 28, 2009, 04:33:00 AM »

Quote from: TM7 on November 28, 2009, 03:41:42 AM

Okay I'll give Sarah a chance... So lets drill down on a couple of things about her, that truthfully I don't know about.

I do know, however, She is an avowed Israel firster....that means she puts the USA as existing primarily/solely to promote, fund, and assure existence of physical isreal, erzatz isreal, and chosenism. This is explained by writings of Falwell, Haggee, and other evangelicals. This makes her eligible to access the enormous AIPAC political funding network.

You say that: YOU DO KNOW, that she is an Israel "firster".
How do you know this? Quotes please, and sources, on where she said this.
I too, am a supporter of the "right of Israel to exist", and if ANYONE IS A TRUE CHRISTIAN, they too will support their right. A TRUE CHRISTIAN, knows that Israel was there first, and is only "reclaiming" what was originally theirs to begin with.

You also said: This makes her eligible to access the enormous AIPAC political funding network.
Where did you get you info on this, or is this also YOUR OPINION AND YOUR SPECULATION?

You also said: THAT MEANS, she puts the USA as existing primarily/sole to promote, fund, and assure of existence of "physical Israel", eretz Israel, and chosen-ism.
Once again! HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS? Quotes please, and sources, on where she said this.
I SAY: That, that is what it means TO YOU, but not necessarily to Palin or anyone else for that matter. Neither your, nor I has access into what she THINKS, only to what she says. SO! When did she make this analogy, or is it just YOUR ANALOGY of her?

i]YOU ALSO ASK?
Secondly, what corporations did she fight against, AND what ones did she promote....?

What are the exact transgressions she is accused, who are the accussors, and what is the status of these charges currently?

Finally, I understand she is a fisherwomen....what has been her history and position on Alaskan salmon farming and other fish farming practices...?

thanx...TM7

These last three questions you ask, are easily researched by yourself. Put forth the effort you have exhibited toward researching the "misunderstood" Muslim. It would seem MORE IMPORTANT to the average American, to know these impertinent facts than why the Muslim blows himself up.

In your "feigned attempt at truth", you EXPOSED YOUR ATTEMPT AT BAITING, by "spinning the questions" as nothing more than a SET UP. You defend the Muslim, and DEFAME the American Patriot which is in this case Palin. You are ironglow, in reverse. BUT! ironglow is an AMERICAN FIRST, and being an American myself, I appreciate that even when I disagree with him. What are you TM7? Are you an American FIRST, or just another Muslim sympathizer?

jcn59 · « **Reply #43 on:** November 28, 2009, 05:09:14 AM »

The political wheel gets more and more out of balance. It was angry Republicans who tipped the vote to Osama; now watch the angry democrats tip the next election to whoever runs as a Republican, again regardless of that candidate's abilities. We could very easily find ourselves electing another idiot, mostly because those are the only kind people who seem to want the job.

Move the nation's capitol to the midwest and watch droves of competent people run for the office. The current batch of political creeps, aides and lobbyists who run our country into the ground are afraid to live in the midwest because we have religion and guns. And accountability. They just wouldn't fit in.

Dee · « **Reply #44 on:** November 28, 2009, 06:27:18 AM »

That's what I thought

.

jcn59 · « **Reply #45 on:** November 28, 2009, 06:35:46 AM »

If Osama got elected by reading teleprompter drivel, what makes you think Palin will have to do anything more intelligent than show some cleavage to get elected. She won't need a "position" on anything!

W got in twice, not because he's genius, but because he had to be just good enough to beat two paper rectums. The next Republican president won't have to know anything either; he just needs to be better than the current idiot. It's the political version of the Peter Principle. Instead of "dumbing up", it's "dumbing down". It's the reason each president is usually worse than his predecessor. It's not just your imagination.

My point is that after 4 years of obama, a corpse could beat him. Wait.....someone already said that.

Dee · « **Reply #46 on:** November 28, 2009, 08:34:17 AM »

TM, almost know one reads those endless pastings. Most folks here know that your anti-American everything. I posted for the folks that might be stupid enough to believe your anti-American propaganda, and after doing so felt rather foolish myself. It was silly of me to think that anyone whom would fall for your anti-Americanism would be smart enough to read anyway. So my apologies sir. We are finished this one too. Again!

Dee · « **Reply #47 on:** November 28, 2009, 09:15:43 AM »

Now that's funny.

Squib · « **Reply #48 on:** November 28, 2009, 12:05:49 PM »

TM7, the money trail is scary but in itself doesn't prove "control"

I think to make your point you're gonna have to do the "reading between the lines" for us

I was unaware of what the mccain-feingold act really accomplished... now i've got to research it some more (more red shield)

mechanic · « **Reply #49 on:** November 28, 2009, 12:37:53 PM »

Dee,
I sure would have hated to be interrogated by you when you were a cop. You have a bad habit of "cutting to the chase". Sometimes one line on the church sign is worth more than the whole sermon..........

Squib · « **Reply #50 on:** November 28, 2009, 01:33:26 PM »

jcn... that wheel wobbling left and right still has the momentum to get us somewhere, the THIRD way

jcn59 · « **Reply #51 on:** November 28, 2009, 01:55:59 PM »

Flat?

Squib · « **Reply #52 on:** November 28, 2009, 02:12:58 PM »

yeah that too jcn- but I was thinking of the analogy meaning the right and left push the wheel LEFT or RIGHT a bit when a new administration gets in every four-eight years and that the wheel was going forward to.... totalitarianism

yeah, it will fall flat, but will it because totalitarianism knocked it down OR because the deconstructionist took it down intentionally to build something else entirely from the carnage

Squib · « **Reply #53 on:** November 28, 2009, 02:13:29 PM »

longest tm7?

Dee · « **Reply #54 on:** November 29, 2009, 02:25:28 AM »

Quote from: mechanic on November 28, 2009, 12:37:53 PM

Dee,
I sure would have hated to be interrogated by you when you were a cop. You have a bad habit of "cutting to the chase". Sometimes one line on the church sign is worth more than the whole sermon..........

Actually mechanic, it wasn't an interrogation. TM7 STARTED OUT SAYING: " WHAT I DO KNOW". I simply wanted to to know HOW HE "KNEW". I think it's obvious he doesn't know at all. She doesn't fit his thought process and beliefs and he was setting up another opportunity to defame her some more while someone tried to defend indefensible questions that were constructed to be so, and weren't really questions at all, but OPINIONS. He is continually guilty of precisely what he accuses others of. Uninformed assumptions. I am thus far surprised that he has not "yet" defended the poor Muslim that shot up Ft. Hood.

Squib · « **Reply #55 on:** November 29, 2009, 02:41:38 AM »

well back to the point of sarah palin

I think that the interpretation of right and wrong is up to the individual to decide- compare to individual preference and motivation- with most anything that tm7 posts, I won't call him misinformed or ignorant though. for the longest time I was in a turtle-shell, being introspective... it taught me to not be a terd. then I started looking around, judging others and then using turtle-vision to discriminate all similarities between myself and the people I see around me (sadly I'm pretty similiar to the freaks and to the decent), third I started trying to follow the power of american society- and other than basic materialism and greed (hypocrisy comes from greed, that's why it's not emphasised) I just couldn't get it. Follow the money, the religions are just cosmologies to the believers, but the people in politics aren't believers but decievers, and they turn what is a cosmological guiding light/beacon to righteousness into a weapon. the money is what gets the leaders of the faiths to sell out and compromise. TM7 is almost aggressively vocal in his summation of specific deeds as it pertains to his arguments... as I said earlier his being right isn't necessarily true by interpretation of the information, but the info checks out as well as I can research it... everytime.

we shouldn't be arguing the money trails or the religions anyways, they're wrote down and recorded just short of consistently. we need to argue the meaning of the topic. we can't change cause and effect, we can only debate why and what if?

Squib · « **Reply #56 on:** November 29, 2009, 02:49:41 AM »

is the rich/elite/zionist pulling the strings for nwo or just protecting cherished interests of a familial and religious priority

the devil is in the details, take that figuratively or religiously and it still works out the same. it's the interpretation of the actions that will foster alliances and plots. we know who the red shield is (most of them), we know of the military conflicts in the M/E, we know who the politicians and campaign supporters here in the US are, we know who sarah palin is

personally I'll probably vote for her because I want my side to win (I THINK my side is white/christian/conservative) and don't think that israel is corrupt but that doesn't mean that israel and the american right aren't puppets to the red shields either.... I'm just a worker bee to the elite anyways so I can't expect more than to throw in my vote for the new boss in 2012. like Dee says vote constitution first. with religion involved or not the constitution has all the guidance we need as a nation (it's the PEOPLE that need jesus- jews, christians, muslims)

jcn59 · « **Reply #57 on:** November 29, 2009, 06:27:44 AM »

Glory to God, and on earth peace, toward men of good will.

Dee · « **Reply #58 on:** November 29, 2009, 07:15:29 AM »

Quote from: TM7 on November 29, 2009, 04:16:25 AM

Quote from: Dee on November 29, 2009, 02:25:28 AM
Quote from: mechanic on November 28, 2009, 12:37:53 PM
Dee,
I sure would have hated to be interrogated by you when you were a cop. You have a bad habit of "cutting to the chase". Sometimes one line on the church sign is worth more than the whole sermon..........

Actually mechanic, it wasn't an interrogation. TM7 STARTED OUT SAYING: " WHAT I DO KNOW". I simply wanted to to know HOW HE "KNEW". I think it's obvious he doesn't know at all. She doesn't fit his thought process and beliefs and he was setting up another opportunity to defame her some more while someone tried to defend indefensible questions that were constructed to be so, and weren't really questions at all, but OPINIONS. He is continually guilty of precisely what he accuses others of. Uninformed assumptions. I am thus far surprised that he has not "yet" defended the poor Muslim that shot up Ft. Hood.
.

Dee...you ever heard the expression, "There's so much bull crap in Texas,,,you're bound to step in some."..?

You aim to prove that True I reckon..? I have never maligned Ms.Palin...in fact always wished her well. If I have show me where. In fact, some of my other questions about her seemed to check out well, epesicially her fisheries policy position as far as I can tell....However, it is a women's perogative to chance her mind... For me israel firsters are treasonous and attempts at merging our secular government with bizarre misstaken cosmology. In fact, most of our current national problems go directly back to this 'chosenist' policy...directly! So I get to criticize it and you get to personally attack me; like 'throwing down a gun' that impunes I supported the Ft Hood shooter somehow. BTW,I thought Matt took care of this kind of pitbull forum antics. So show me where I supported any Ft Hood shooter(s); or where I have supported or defended any murder, mayhem, chaos, terror, etc. from any religion, race, creed, or governmnet. SHOW ME WHERE. You on the other hand, bless and worship such violence everyday based on your concept of religion and futurism...in the name of Christianity and Christ no less, while continuely emphathizing other religions practiced in their poorer forms. As we enter the coming Christian Holiday period, I suggest re-reading the Sermon on the Mount. In your case, especially the part about hypocrits.
And so have a great Holiday.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sqib...good point about 'weaponized' religions.....

TM7

TM, this all started when you said you KNEW certain things about Palin. I merely asked about your sources, and here we are. As I said, you are as dogmatic as any here, and at the present are behaving just like your two favorite antagonists. There's really no reason to insult the great state of Texas just because of an ole fart such as myself not agreeing with you, and asking for sources of what you say you know. I just wanted to know, how you knew.

Dee · « **Reply #59 on:** November 29, 2009, 08:08:06 AM »

We all are often right, though some less than others, and sometimes only in our own minds, and then there are always the two or three that never really say anything at all, but instead belch and fart.
In regards to what you say Palin IS, and I will not redundantly repeat it, as it has been printed by yourself. This is a "SPECULATIVE CONCLUSION" OF YOURS, not necessarily a fact. The only possible way it can be a fact is that if she for example SAYS: I am an Israel first-er!
She has not, unless you have information otherwise. But to say: I am for the right for Israel to exist, and I support them in that right, is not an accurate description of a name such as Israel First-er, and I will give the same analysis of your other things that you say you KNOW, as no proof is offered of YOUR PERSONAL CONCLUSION.

Now! As far as the bull excrement, I am sure that you have left your share of piles in your lovely state, where ever that may be, and here also.