Not in FL maybe in other places. The 350 is too much bullet for the .45-70. The jacket is much too thick.
Would that be the 350g North Fork FP, 350g Speer SP, 350g Swift A-Frame, 350g Hornady FP, Hornady 350g RN, 350g Hawk FP, one of the several 350g Alaska Bullet Works bullets, a GS Custom 350g FP or what? And if they don’t work, why do so many companies make them and why do many experienced hunters use them???
This is just another stupid claim on your part - 350's work very well, even out at 300 yards where the velocity of my handloads is down to the level of Remington’s 405g load at the muzzle.
I dropped a 6x6 bull elk at 213 lasered yards. The bullet passed completely through the left front leg, entered the chest ad was recovered from under the hide on the off side. The near-side leg bone and section of rib were obliterated and a far-side rib was shattered. Three heavy bones, three layers of hide. The bull just stood there for a second and then tipped over.
The next day I busted a mulie buck at 197 lasered yards. It was a quartering away shot and a complete pass-thru. There was 6" of fresh snow on the ground and I've never seen so much blood leakage – it looked like someone had slopped blood from a 5 gallon bucket. Of course the “trail” only went a few feet...
Both animals were taken with a 350g North Fork. One grizzly is down because of a 350g North Fork I sent to a friend in St. Michaels, AK. Lots of deer and elk are down because of 350g.
Apparently you are concerned that the 350g bullets will not expand because the “jacket is much too thick”?
May I point out that hardcast bullets don’t need to expand at all to work very, very well? Or that a non-expanded 350g bullet from a .45-70 is already the diameter of a .224” bullet that has expanded to double its original diameter and that .224” bullets have taken grizzly and polar bears, moose, elk and tons of deer?
Did I mention the 350g North Fork I recovered from the bull elk at 213 lasered yards had expanded to an average diameter of 0.80”?
LMAO.