StrawHat: I thought I might be risking being viewed as a 45LC heretic by making such rash statements!
I will put these books on my Christmas list, along with a few others that have been recommended over the past year.
The necked up 222s do have a certain fascination for me as they do represent economy of powder and larger calibers. In that same vein I have also looked at the 25 Hornet and its big brother the 270 REN, as I am familiar with and like the 22 Hornet. I think the smaller cartridges and bigger calibers is an area of exploration that holds many possibilities. I really have been looking at any combination of H&R and chamber reaming that could produce interesting combinations, without having to go thru the rebore expense, which makes the 25 Hornet and 270 REN less attractive to work on.
I have also been looking at applying the pistol cartridge Special/Magnum/Max/Super Mag family idea to other cartridges like the 460 S&W, to make them more versatile. The 357 Mag uses lengths of 1.155, 1.290, and 1.605 case lengths for the Special, Mag and Max, all shooting with about equal accuracy in the H&R in-spite of the large freebore the 38 and 357 have to overcome in the 357 Max chamber. Likewise, the 44 Special/44 Mag and 445 Super Mag use 1.160, 1.285, and 1.610 case lengths. If you apply the same freebore limits to a 460 S&W, you get a 460 Special , 460 Magnum and 460 S&W with 1.350, 1.475, and 1.800 case lengths, three distinct power levels without having to pay for a rebore. I think a 357 Max, 445 Super Mag and 460 S&W would make a great trio of range and field fun rifles for myself and my two teenage sons.
As I said, I have way too much time on my hands and way too little money, when I get the money thing fixed by getting a good job, the time thing will shrink and I will be complaining about not enough time to work on the projects when I get started back up. It will be a nice problem to have though.
Brian