LOL yes that particular 30-30 is an expensive bench made( i.e hand made rifle) I didn't have it made just found it at a gun show and yes it's my most expensive rifle
however there still remains the fact that I also shoot and load for several 303 rifles of varying vintages and as yet have not seen a case seperation in using them with a handload. Poorly stored milsurps ammo yes I have had cases crack and split but not with a handload.
Now back to 30-30 one thing to watch for in undersized brass. For some reason the modern US makers don't seem to be able to make the brass cses to the dimensions that the specs call for. Winchester 30-30 brass is undersize on the rim dia, R.P 303 British is undersize in the web dimension and those are just two that I use. The R.P 303 brass I take advantage of this error to make 6.5x53R cases out of as the web area is 0.005" smaller there on the 6.5mm than the .303 is supposed to be.
As for this:-
I am glad you are exempt from case head failure. Obviously you have quality firearms without headspacing problems. Those of us with inexpensive firearms or mass produced firearms have to deal with excessive head space once in a while. Sometimes on more than one gun.
Now that gave me a chuckle
I am down one 303 now having just sold it, it no longer fitting into my small collection. This carbine was a Martini Enfield AC11 converted to that spec back in 1898 by The Henry Rifle Barrel Company from a Martini Hernry IC1 made in 1888. What one would call a mass production weapon it's fair to say.
I do have one .303 rifle that caused problems
not case seperations but the chamber was too darned tight and we could not find any dies that would size brass down to chamber, we tried 5 different sets of dies from three different makers too no avail so I had it re-chambered to .303 Improved which has sorted the prblem. Once I get the rear bridge machined down to a suitable profile so I can put scope mounts on it, Century who sporterised this P-14 cut the ears off but to what profile I cannot find out as Century refuse to answer my query
, then I can get some sights on it and start load development. So far all I have done is fire form some cases using milsurp HXP 69 Greek ammo.
Now lets see on the 303 front there is the two BSA converted sporting rifles from the 1949-1953 period one of which needs a new barrel and a another stock due to the ravages of time and previous owners
and another BSA sporting conversion but this time on a Metford carbine action built, well we don't know on this one as it had a new 1939 surplus barrel fitted when I acquired it some dozen or so years ago. On the BSA Model E I just fitted a Redfield reciever sight and using some of the Greek shot this group:-
from prone at 50 yards
Lastly there is the Martini Muscat in .303 Bore which is of Belgian manufacture. This one has a different chamber and a tight bore with what appears to be "Rachet" rifling where one side of the land is deeper than the other so like a rachet tooth in profile. I keep some brass segregated for this one due to it's rounded shoulder rather than the tapered one the 303 should have. Finally we have a Parker-Hale sporterised No4 Mk1/2.
So thats' the current crop of 303's I am loading for others have been and gone in the past and despite there being three WW1 vintage rifles and two WW2 production rifles as I say none have caused a case seperation. A lot of which I lay at the feet of the correctly dimensioned brass which is the Greek HXP of 1969 vintage that I brought as a case of surplus ammo and shot off.
This really made me laugh:-
and less voluminous cash flow
Oh if only you knew
I'll wager that not many members have a low fixed income like I do (just over $110 US a week)
I gave up my apartment and job some 4 years ago to help care for my parents which is a full time job for me. Only yesterday Dad had a small cancerous lump removed from his arm
let's hope they got it all!