Whenever I talk about "sportzerizing" a mil-surp Mauser, people say that it will cost as much as a new commercial rifle. When I compare the quality of a good mil-surp mauser with new commercial products, however, I tend to lean toward the Mauser. Many new commercial sporters have a fragile, cheap and tinny feel about them. Plastic stocks give me the creeps.
I'm contemplating a good Yugo 48 milsurp, caliber 8x57, laminated wood military stock and thinking of rebarrelling with stainless steel barrel (for shooting corrosive 8mm military ammo), and altered bolt handle, safety, trigger and drill and tap for scope. I would also install an IER mount for extended eye relief scopes and keep the clip slots in the receiver. With the IER scope it can be quickly loaded with stripper clips. Yes it will cost as much as "new" commercial rifle, but frankly I think it would be better than most new commercial rifles. I intend to keep the laminated military stock as is. It's in great shape, is seemingly indestructibe and inspires more confidence than cheesy plastic "synthetics". I kind of like the rugged handling qualities of mil-mausers.
McGowen Precision Barrels with duplicate the existing military barrel contour for an extra $25 bucks. Unfortunatly, most "sportzerized" mausers look like abortions. I'd rather have a standard Mil-Mauser set up for a scope with a good trigger and nothing else. The as-is laminated military stock is very stable and virtually indestructible. The metal work on the Mauser action is superior to most of what I see on commercial rifles today.
Except for those specimens with totally corroded and shot out bores, mil surp mausers have been the most accurate and certainly the most reliable rifles I"ve ever used. I've had accuracy and feeding prob's with M-70's, Howa's, Remington's, etc., but never with good Mausers.
Frankly I kind of like the idea of an ugly duckling, plain Jane looking Mil-surp that has a stainless match barrel, premium trigger and minimal mod's for a scope. Kind of like a junker looking car with a racing mill under the hood.
Does anybody else feel that a minimally altered Mil-surp Mauser in good shape with selected improvements (i.e. barrel, bolt, trigger) is more desirable and more reliable than a "new" commercial product?