No, but the opposite HAS been presented - that being that if it's an action between two legally consenting adults then it is NOT "wrong" (or rather, should not be illegal).
Do you even read what you write? Of course the opposite was presented (that was yellowtail's "argument"), but since nobody had made the claim that it was wrong, then how could he logically ARGUE that it was not wrong.
Either way, if you want to make it into what the community says, depending on which survey you look at, while people who actually ARE gay may be a small percentage, between 65% and 90% of the population are not opposed to gay people.
Well, if that is true, then it is a non-issue.
For those of us who are straight, why should we worry at all? Do you think the gays are going to sneak into your room at night and feed you some pills that make you gay?
It always makes me laugh when the politically correct "enlightened" types get up on their high horse and go for the "homophobe card". No, I am not afraid of homosexuals. In fact, I don't think about them very often. Mainly just when some sneering elitist tries to tell me that homosexuality is normal.
It also took another group of people nearly 70 years to get rid of slavery via an additional amendment, which the Founders themselves neglected.
Through a process that the Founders incorporated into the Constitution to deal with just those types of issues. I say that they were brilliant men.
It states that the government shall make no law respecting any particular religion
If you are going to criticize those that you quote, you should at least get it right. It states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof".
Many jurisdictions have claimed that the National Guard fills the role of a militia in the 2nd amendment and as such since they have guns then the amendment is satisfied and need not apply to individual citizens.
They can claim it all they like, but they must ignore the language of the 2nd Amendment to make that argument (applying to the "right of the people" as it does).
There is no victim in such "crimes".
In that you are wrong. Prostitution, for example, is often called a victimless crime, yet the consequences of that activity often produces "victims", from the prostitutes themselves (beatings, STD's, drug addiction, etc.) to the families of the "Johns" (divorce, destitution of wives and children, etc.). Our actions carry consequences, and just because some are too short sighted to see them, does not mean they don't exist.
As a nation, for all the bad that has happened, we ARE managing to finally squash hatred, prejudice, racism, bigotry, etc. If you're a hold over that still wants to cling to that nonsense, then have at it.
Ahh, back to that. Nowhere have I said that I think that homosexuality should be outlawed, but for stating my OPINION that it is not normal, I am deemed by the elitist PC crowd as a "hater". I don't hate homosexuals, but I don't think we need to hold up their behaviour as something to be emulated. And, you shouldn't assume to know what is in someone else's heart.
You're entitled to your opinions, just don't expect the rest of us to give a darn about them.
Sound advice to you as well.
