Author Topic: omega simplicity  (Read 1886 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Crunch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
omega simplicity
« on: November 03, 2003, 01:20:07 PM »
I've been reading all the posts about the omega, and not having seen one in real life, I have a question. If the 209 ignition is too hot, why not go back to a plain old #11, rather than all this hornett conversion stuff? Just wondering. Crunch

Offline Underclocked

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 629
omega simplicity
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2003, 01:53:56 PM »
Too weak.  ;)  Fine by me but the firing mechanism is a PIN.  They tell me, "it don't work that way, Underclocked." :grin:
WHUT?

Offline daddywpb

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
omega simplicity
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2003, 01:26:04 AM »
What's the problem with the Omega ignition system? Can someone tell me which post this discussion is on? I'd like to see it.
Thanks.

Offline RandyWakeman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1246
    • RandyWakeman
omega simplicity
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2003, 02:08:12 PM »
There is no "problem".

209's came into play due to pellets, and aren't going away.

Offline daddywpb

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
omega simplicity
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2003, 02:10:35 PM »
209's are also easier to handle, weatherproof and a lot more reliable. I certainly don't have any complaints, and wouldn't want to use #11 caps with loose powder or pellets if I had a choice.

Offline Oldsnow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 118
omega simplicity
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2003, 06:10:16 PM »
Crunch I have an Omega and Oncore both in 50 cal. and I was getting flyers from both rifles with standard 209 primers. Now I shoot Remington 209-4 primers. The 209-4 primer is used to reload 410 shot shells and only has half the fire that a standard 209 primer has. Now my Omega averages 1 1/2" groups at 100yds. with out any flyers.
Thats all she wrote.

Offline flintlock54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 127
omega simplicity
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2003, 06:15:27 AM »
daddywpd,

#11 caps not a good choice in an in-line?

The White rifles seem to have some degree of success using them.

This week I am going to experiment with the Knight original disc #11 adapters in my Knight Disc Magnum. I will let everyone know the results.

I plan on testing in my 26" Knight Disc Magnum:

777 pellets
777 loose
Clean Shot FFFg

With:

220 grain Dead Centers
XTP 240
XTP 300

And:

Federal 209
CCI 209
#11 caps/Disc adapter
<><

Offline daddywpb

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
omega simplicity
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2003, 09:38:06 AM »
I don't remember saying they weren't a good choice - if you like them, use them. What I said was - I would much rather use 209's if I had the choice, and I do. I've had misfires and hangfires with percussion caps. I've never had a misfire or hangfire with a 209 primer.

Offline flintlock54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 127
omega simplicity
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2003, 11:43:17 AM »
:D

209's it is!
<><