« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Superbowl???  (Read 470 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rustyinfla

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
Superbowl???
« on: February 09, 2010, 05:24:16 PM »

   I didn't watch the game I was sleeping before going to work. Every year people talk about t he commercials. What was the best commercial in this year's line up?

  Any really funny ones?
Logged
If you're gonna be stupid ya gotta be tuff

Offline MGMorden

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2010, 06:40:07 PM »
I was watching with a bunch of family - nice, but the downside is they like to talk a lot during the breaks (so I didn't get to really watch the commercials like I wanted to).

My two favorites though were the Etrade Baby commercial and the Punxsutawney Polamalu commercial.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbLTl7egwlU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFzIdZbypNk
Logged

Offline blind ear

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4156
  • Gender: Male
    • eddiegjr
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2010, 03:03:48 AM »
The advertising industry has lost it's imagination. About as dull a bunch of commercials as I have ever seen on the super bowl. eddie
Logged
Oath Keepers: start local
-
“It is no coincidence that the century of total war coincided with the century of central banking.” – Ron Paul, End the Fed
-
An economic crash like the one of the 1920s is the only thing that will get the US off of the road to Socialism that we are on and give our children a chance at a future with freedom and possibility of economic success.
-
everyone hears but very few see. (I can't see either, I'm not on the corporate board making rules that sound exactly the opposite of what they mean, plus loopholes) ear
"I have seen the enemy and I think it's us." POGO
St Judes Childrens Research Hospital

Offline Slowhanddd

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (43)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 691
  • Gender: Male
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2010, 01:26:13 PM »
Got to agree on the dull commercials and no imagination.They sucked as bad as the half time show.Slow
Logged
Life is not about how fast you run, or how high you climb, but how well
you bounce

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2010, 02:02:32 PM »
What do people who watch the superbowl actually do while watching it? Is it just a matter of sitting on the couch and snacking or is there more to it?
Logged
Safety first

Offline NYH1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1695
  • Gender: Male
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2010, 02:25:52 PM »
Quote from: Slowhanddd on February 10, 2010, 01:26:13 PM
Got to agree on the dull commercials and no imagination.They sucked as bad as the half time show.Slow
+1!
Logged
"ROLL TIDE". . .Back To Back. . .Three In The Last Four Years "GO GIANTS"  "YANKEES"

Offline teamnelson

  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4487
  • Gender: Male
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2010, 02:31:28 PM »
Quote
Quote from: Slowhanddd on Today at 02:26:13 PM
Quote
Got to agree on the dull commercials and no imagination.They sucked as bad as the half time show.Slow

+1!

+1 ... poor choice for a halftime band. My 14 yo laughed when he saw The Who lip synching; he thought that started with milli vanilli.
Logged
held fast

Offline Brett

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5148
  • Gender: Male
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2010, 06:23:48 AM »
Quote from: TeamNelson on February 10, 2010, 02:31:28 PM
Quote
Quote from: Slowhanddd on Today at 02:26:13 PM
Quote
Got to agree on the dull commercials and no imagination.They sucked as bad as the half time show.Slow

+1!

+1 ... poor choice for a halftime band. My 14 yo laughed when he saw The Who lip synching; he thought that started with milli vanilli.

Definitely no lip sinking going on their. they would have sounded a lot better if they had.  Pete and Rodger's performance was lacking the intensity they had in their youth.  No midair splits while taking windmill chops on Pete's ax, none of Roger's trademark microphone twirling. And just an overall ho hum flat performance.  They never were technically the best but they had an energy, an aura, that few bands could match in their day and I day say few if any bands have today.  For you youngsters who had never experienced THE WHO during their heyday I challenge you to find a copy of the 'video rockumentory' called "The Kids Are Alright - THE WHO".  I guarantee it will to blow you away.
Logged
Life memberships:  <><, NRA, BASS, NAFC

Offline Skunk

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3520
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2010, 06:30:47 AM »
Quote from: Brett on February 11, 2010, 06:23:48 AM
Definitely no lip sinking going on their. they would have sounded a lot better if they had.  Pete and Rodger's performance was lacking the intensity they had in their youth.  No midair splits while taking windmill chops on Pete's ax, none of Roger's trademark microphone twirling. And just an overall ho hum flat performance.  They never were technically the best but they had an energy, an aura, that few bands could match in their day and I day say few if any bands have today.  For you youngsters who had never experienced THE WHO during their heyday I challenge you to find a copy of the 'video rockumentory' called "The Kids Are Alright - THE WHO".  I guarantee it will to blow you away.

Yep, Yep!! Big +1 on that. Brett knows.
Logged
Mike

"Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition" - Frank Loesser

Offline teamnelson

  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4487
  • Gender: Male
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2010, 08:09:10 AM »
Uhh ... I have it on my DVR, and rewound it to make sure, and there were a few times what was coming out of the speakers wasn't what was going in the mike. It probably was recorded recently to match their currently scratchy vocal quality ... makes sense, thats a big show to screw up so they didn't want to take chances. If you have it recorded, check it out.

This is hotly debated all over the internet right now so we're not going to solve it here.  ;D
Logged
held fast

Offline gstewart44

  • Trade Count: (20)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1645
  • Gender: Male
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2010, 09:25:10 AM »
Quote from: Brett on February 11, 2010, 06:23:48 AM
Quote from: TeamNelson on February 10, 2010, 02:31:28 PM
Quote
Quote from: Slowhanddd on Today at 02:26:13 PM
Quote
Got to agree on the dull commercials and no imagination.They sucked as bad as the half time show.Slow

+1!

+1 ... poor choice for a halftime band. My 14 yo laughed when he saw The Who lip synching; he thought that started with milli vanilli.

Definitely no lip sinking going on their. they would have sounded a lot better if they had.  Pete and Rodger's performance was lacking the intensity they had in their youth.  No midair splits while taking windmill chops on Pete's ax, none of Roger's trademark microphone twirling. And just an overall ho hum flat performance.  They never were technically the best but they had an energy, an aura, that few bands could match in their day and I day say few if any bands have today.  For you youngsters who had never experienced THE WHO during their heyday I challenge you to find a copy of the 'video rockumentory' called "The Kids Are Alright - THE WHO".  I guarantee it will to blow you away.
+1 on the Who.    I got to see them live in 1975 at Tampa Stadium with the Eagles.    What a show.   they had the energy of a hundred JackRussell Terriers that have bee caged for a month!.   One of the most enjoyable shows I have seen. 
Logged
I'm just tryin' to keep everything in balance, Woodrow. You do more work than you got to, so it's my obligation to do less. (Gus McCrae)

Offline gstewart44

  • Trade Count: (20)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1645
  • Gender: Male
Re: Superbowl???
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2010, 09:30:43 AM »
Quote from: TeamNelson on February 11, 2010, 08:09:10 AM
Uhh ... I have it on my DVR, and rewound it to make sure, and there were a few times what was coming out of the speakers wasn't what was going in the mike. It probably was recorded recently to match their currently scratchy vocal quality ... makes sense, thats a big show to screw up so they didn't want to take chances. If you have it recorded, check it out.

This is hotly debated all over the internet right now so we're not going to solve it here.  ;D
My observations were that some of the instruments were prerecorded (keybords/organ on Baba OReilly and Won't get Fooled Again) but the Who have been doing that for 30+ years.  I am going to replay my DVR again and see if I can tell any discrepencies in the vocals.   I did notice that Pete Townsend did change the rythym of some of his vocals.....syncopated pauses that were different from the original recordings.  whether it was planned that way or just CRS sneeaking up on Pete, it was noticeable.  

Roger's voice was gravelly and lacking the power and range of his youth....if that was his choice for a Pre-record then his mind is slipping as well.     Anyway I did enjoy seeing these guys still rocking .....
Logged
I'm just tryin' to keep everything in balance, Woodrow. You do more work than you got to, so it's my obligation to do less. (Gus McCrae)
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »