Author Topic: Sabots  (Read 1939 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline RocklockI

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2747
  • Gender: Male
  • Morko and Me
Re: Sabots
« Reply #30 on: March 23, 2010, 08:09:24 PM »
Yes it would burst , I'm saying that 'the water' would be the seal for a very short time . The balloon or baggie would surley burst . The only reason for the baggie or balloon is so the powder does not get all wet .

Gary
"I've seen too much not to stay in touch , With a world full of love and luck, I got a big suspicion 'bout ammunition I never forget to duck" J.B.

Offline GGaskill

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5668
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sabots
« Reply #31 on: March 23, 2010, 08:53:32 PM »
I think a just under bore sized lubricated piece of semi-hard rubber between powder and shot would be a better seal and absorb much less of the powder energy, thus maximizing the velocity of the shot.  The mass of the water filler baggie would slow down the shot because of the added mass to accelerate.
GG
“If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.”
--Winston Churchill

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: Sabots
« Reply #32 on: March 23, 2010, 11:51:19 PM »
why not try nylon or teflon ??
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry

Offline Cat Whisperer

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7493
  • Gender: Male
  • Pulaski Coehorn Works
Re: Sabots
« Reply #33 on: March 24, 2010, 01:13:41 AM »
ONE way to find out ...

Start with rediculously low charges, comes to  mind.
Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)