Author Topic: CNN Poll on Chicago handgun case before the Supreme Court.  (Read 519 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Old Fart

  • Intergalactic Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (77)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3851
  • Gender: Male
CNN Poll on Chicago handgun case before the Supreme Court.
« on: March 02, 2010, 06:04:41 AM »
There's a new poll on CNN on the chicago handgun case.
Pretty close right now.
You guys should go vote.

http://www.cnn.com/

It's on the top row right hand side.
"All my life I've had a bad case of the Fred's. Fredrick Vanderbilt taste on a Fred Sanford budget." CR
Lifetime/Endowment/Patron NRA Member.
Second Amendment Foundation, www.saf.org - Life Member

Offline subdjoe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Gender: Male
Re: CNN Poll on Chicago handgun case before the Supreme Court.
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2010, 06:27:30 AM »
The question is:  Should the Supreme Court uphold Chicago's 1982 handgun ban?

Right now:

Yes
51%
60674


No
49%
59018
Total votes: 119692
This is not a scientific poll
Your ob't & etc,
Joseph Lovell

Justice Robert H. Jackson - It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.

Offline RaySendero

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
  • Gender: Male
Re: CNN Poll on Chicago handgun case before the Supreme Court.
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2010, 06:50:36 AM »
There's a new poll on CNN on the chicago handgun case.
Pretty close right now.
You guys should go vote.

http://www.cnn.com/

It's on the top row right hand side.

I can't find it????
    Ray

Offline MGMorden

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: CNN Poll on Chicago handgun case before the Supreme Court.
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2010, 07:35:16 AM »
Seems to be gone now.  When I visited the only poll on the site was asking about whether or not children should be allowed to enter bars.

Offline Old Fart

  • Intergalactic Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (77)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3851
  • Gender: Male
Re: CNN Poll on Chicago handgun case before the Supreme Court.
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2010, 07:43:56 AM »
It's still there.
On the right hand side.
Titled "Quick Vote"
"All my life I've had a bad case of the Fred's. Fredrick Vanderbilt taste on a Fred Sanford budget." CR
Lifetime/Endowment/Patron NRA Member.
Second Amendment Foundation, www.saf.org - Life Member

Offline MGMorden

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: CNN Poll on Chicago handgun case before the Supreme Court.
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2010, 07:46:55 AM »
It's still there.
On the right hand side.
Titled "Quick Vote"

Strange.  It must be showing different polls at random.  For Quick Vote I get:


Offline Old Fart

  • Intergalactic Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (77)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3851
  • Gender: Male
Re: CNN Poll on Chicago handgun case before the Supreme Court.
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2010, 08:07:28 AM »
You may have been right to begin with.
I didn't really look all that hard when I went back.
And you're right it say something about kids now.
My bad. Sorry.
"All my life I've had a bad case of the Fred's. Fredrick Vanderbilt taste on a Fred Sanford budget." CR
Lifetime/Endowment/Patron NRA Member.
Second Amendment Foundation, www.saf.org - Life Member

Offline teamnelson

  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4487
  • Gender: Male
Re: CNN Poll on Chicago handgun case before the Supreme Court.
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2010, 10:48:51 AM »
I really like how Fox wrote this line:

Quote
The Supreme Court appeared poised Tuesday to issue a ruling that will expand to the states the high court's historic 2008 ruling that individuals have a federally protected right to keep and bear arms.

Please note that our right is federally PROTECTED, not federally GRANTED. We have GOT to make sure that all gun owners understand that distinction. This case could ensure that states could not infringe on a federally protected right by limiting their power. This could create an incredible precedent for state and local legislation that currently restricts ownership and carry, and would more clearly box in local liberal judges from being able claim to state sovereignty on constitutionally protected matters. I hate to call this a decision as its more of an affirmation.
held fast