Author Topic: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP  (Read 2997 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline efremtags

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« on: April 02, 2010, 01:32:50 PM »
I had a very happy and frustrating day at the same time today.

I shot my new encore for the 1st time. My first load was 80gr of BH209 using Fed 209A primers over a 280GRWFN 44cal in a harvester sabot. This shot very well. After some site adjustments, I had a 3shot clover leaf @ 60yds using factory sights. A last adjustment for windage, and I drilled bully eye on my last shot. Good start.

I cleanded the gun and began my Colorado elk load development. I am shooting Hornady 350gr FBP. I varied loads from 80 - 110 gr. None of them would group at all. My shots scattered in every direction. I would guess the groups ran 6-7" @ 60yds.

Is there any suggestions of if this bullet is salvageable in my gun, or do I nee to find a different bullet. I was thinking of trying the 300GR FBP to see if weight makes a difference.

For reference, the bullet loaded pretty easy in my gun. I have heard they are tight in encores, but that was not the case. It wasn't loose, but no more or less difficult than the sabot to load.

Offline TRM-1

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 286
  • Gender: Male
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2010, 01:43:36 PM »
If they loaded pretty easy That is most likely the problem. I may be wrong but that blackhorn powder needs to build pressure to shoot good. I shoot 120 grains of blackhorn powder and a 250 grain shockwave with excellent results, But I am not hunting elk in colorado. What did you use to clean your gun? With the blackhorn you only use hoppes or something similar. Don't use the traditional type of cleaners. Also I don't swab in between shots I just keep shooting. Hope I have gave some info that may help.

Offline Semisane

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 569
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2010, 02:13:26 PM »
I know Blackhorn is the do-all/end-all powder efremtags, but if I wanted to shoot that bullet I think I would try some Triple Seven.
CLICK ON ME: .
Link to... highchairstands@cox.net

Offline kctibs

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 244
  • Gender: Male
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2010, 03:04:08 PM »
Try a different bullet my Encore seem pretty picky on the bullets I put down the barrel. Powder did not seem to make a big difference one way or the other.
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country."
-- Benjamin Franklin

Offline efremtags

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2010, 03:12:21 PM »
so far I am happy with the BH powder. I know a lot of shooters who use T7 and the they all complain about crud. I had no real buildup in my gun between cleanings and could probably just have kept shooting, but I wanted a baseline for load development. I don;t think the issue is the powder, like I said the sabots shoot very well

I am thinking a different brand bullet may be the way to go. I am dissapointed as I like the idea of the FPB. What other conicals are out there worth trying.

I use regular cleaning solvent to clean the gun (bore foam actually). Let it soak a few minutes than run a couple of patches. I am going to get a bore snake for my MZL. My 45 cal is a little loose in the 50, anI don't have a 20g shotgun size so I did it the old fashioned way, ramrod and patch. Took 10 minutes to clean, no real elbow grease needed.


Offline Semisane

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 569
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2010, 05:48:07 PM »
Quote
I don't think the issue is the powder

Actually, as long as you're talking conicals efremtags, I thing the issue IS the powder.  I've seen lots of reports about the success of Blackhorn with a wide variety of sabotted bullets.  But I don't recall any that report good results with full bore conicals.
CLICK ON ME: .
Link to... highchairstands@cox.net

Offline efremtags

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2010, 03:24:46 AM »
not sure of your obsession with 777. I have read many reviews with good sucess with the exact loads I am using, which is why I am so frustrated. Granted I am using open sites, but I'm talking 7" groups here.

I just invested 100 bucks in powder, so switching is not an option. I like BH.

I may try the new thor bullets I have only just heard of in these threads. I may mic. the bullets I have and get the next size up (which is a very cool feature , they come in 3 diametrs).

I am not sure why a tight fit is needed, as the hole point of a mine style conical is the compression comes after the bullets widen from the shot to seal the bore. My guess is the harder coper does not seal as well as the original all lead design.

I'll report my findings in a week or so if the results are positive for any other Encore shooters out there.

Offline TRM-1

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 286
  • Gender: Male
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2010, 05:16:11 AM »
I agree about the blackhorn powder being the problem with this bullet because of the loose fit. Blackhorn has to build pressure as it is ignited. The loose fit of the bullet doesn't build the pressure it needs to burn correctly. Therefore your accuracy is hurting. I am no fan of 777. When I switched to BH I never looked back. I had the pellets and the loose 777 and gave it all away. I think I would go smokeless before I would go back to the crud ring and the swabbing when shooting. I never minded the cleanup after shooting but the swabbing in between was a pain.

I hope you have some luck finding a full bore bullet that you can shoot with the blackhorn powder. Keep us informed.

Offline Semisane

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 569
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2010, 06:43:52 AM »
Quote
not sure of your obsession with 777

I assure you I don't have an obsession with Triple 7.  In fact, I don't use it much.  Most of my shooting is with GOEX.  I was just trying to help you identify the problem, and I really think you're missing my point.  Blackhorn seems to be a great powder for tight fitting sabots but not for slip fit conicals.  (Read that again.  It's not suitable for loose bullets.)  You're likely getting inconsistent burning rates with those bullets and that's giving you poor accuracy.  Remember, it was your experience that the sabots shot great, but not the conicals.  Go ahead and try the Thor bullets instead of another powder.  You'll likely get the same results.  On the other hand, you could spend the same money and try T7 with your FPBs to find out if that's the problem.  If those FPBs shoot well with another powder you will know for sure.  Heck, if the FPBs shoot well with T7, switching powder for just the Colorado hunt doesn't seem like a big deal to me.  
CLICK ON ME: .
Link to... highchairstands@cox.net

Offline Qualitymilk

  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 133
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2010, 08:20:06 AM »
For what its worth, my Encore PH Muzzleloader likes the BH 209, but I had to try a few diff. bullets too.  The shockwaves shoot well, but I found lighter was better in my gun.  It did not like Powerbelts at all.  In my experience your groups get smaller the less you clean, and I would agree that a "tighter" fitting bullet shoots more accurately.  Hope that may help....

Offline Busta

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2586
  • Gender: Male
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP (WARNING PIC HEAVY POST)
« Reply #10 on: April 03, 2010, 08:42:48 AM »
I had a very happy and frustrating day at the same time today.

I shot my new encore for the 1st time. My first load was 80gr of BH209 using Fed 209A primers over a 280GRWFN 44cal in a harvester sabot. This shot very well. After some site adjustments, I had a 3shot clover leaf @ 60yds using factory sights. A last adjustment for windage, and I drilled bully eye on my last shot. Good start.

I cleanded the gun and began my Colorado elk load development. I am shooting Hornady 350gr FBP. I varied loads from 80 - 110 gr. None of them would group at all. My shots scattered in every direction. I would guess the groups ran 6-7" @ 60yds.

Is there any suggestions of if this bullet is salvageable in my gun, or do I nee to find a different bullet. I was thinking of trying the 300GR FBP to see if weight makes a difference.

For reference, the bullet loaded pretty easy in my gun. I have heard they are tight in encores, but that was not the case. It wasn't loose, but no more or less difficult than the sabot to load.

Quote
I don't think the issue is the powder

Actually, as long as you're talking conicals efremtags, I thing the issue IS the powder.  I've seen lots of reports about the success of Blackhorn with a wide variety of sabotted bullets.  But I don't recall any that report good results with full bore conicals.

Quote
not sure of your obsession with 777

I assure you I don't have an obsession with Triple 7.  In fact, I don't use it much.  Most of my shooting is with GOEX.  I was just trying to help you identify the problem, and I really think you're missing my point.  Blackhorn seems to be a great powder for tight fitting sabots but not for slip fit conicals.  (Read that again.  It's not suitable for loose bullets.)  You're likely getting inconsistent burning rates with those bullets and that's giving you poor accuracy.  Remember, it was your experience that the sabots shot great, but not the conicals.  Go ahead and try the Thor bullets instead of another powder.  You'll likely get the same results.  On the other hand, you could spend the same money and try T7 with your FPBs to find out if that's the problem.  If those FPBs shoot well with another powder you will know for sure.  Heck, if the FPBs shoot well with T7, switching powder for just the Colorado hunt doesn't seem like a big deal to me.  

Semi,

I beg to differ, although for his particular rifle you may be 100% right?


efremtags,

I have a few cases of Blackhorn 209 under my belt, and have been shooting it almost exclusively since it has been available, right at 2 years now. The 350 gr FPB shoots better than ANY other bullet in my H&R/NEF rifles. I do use custom breech plugs in my rifles, the standard H&R/NEF breech plug is useless for shooting BH209.

I would bet that your QLA on your T/C is not concentric to the bore. The QLA has been the biggest problem with getting conicals to shoot well out of the T/C's. They can be accurate as anything with saboted bullets, and this throws alot of people off.

A few things to remember when shooting BH209. You need to seat bullets firmly, keep the flame channel clean of carbon build up (1/8" drill bit turned by hand down to the flash hole), AND use a hot 209 primer (Fed 209A or CCI 209M).

You do know that Colorado also removed the 2x the diameter bullet length restriction for 2010, don't you? That opens up several other options that were once illegal to use.

I have several pictures, but will post a few here. I think they will speak for themselves. The problem is neither the powder or the bullet, and I know guys that have T/C's with good QLA's that will shoot them well. My NEF will shoot them into one hole occasionally, and under an inch more than not as long as the nut behind the butt don't get too loose. I would bet your QLA, or the flame channel in your breech plug is the problem.

FPB's








Conicals. I do use the .518" diameter by .060" thick vegetable fiber gasket wads under my slip fit conicals, and use bullets .001" over bore for best results. (.502" bore, .503" diameter bullets). I do pack the powder under the wad before loading the bullet, then seat bullet firmly. Haven't had any problems with ignition or accuracy.











One other option you might want to consider is the THOR, they come in 250 and 300 grain. You can get a sample pack for free by calling or e-mailing. The 4 bullets will come in .500", .501", .502", .503". You start with the .500" and then go up in size until you get one that goes down the bore with enough pressure that it stays put on your charge.


http://www.thorbullets.com/

I used the 430 gr White Super Slug, the one next to the FPB in the above photo to take my last Colorado elk.


Good luck on your hunt, part of the fun is all the shooting back home to prepare for the hunt. Hope this helps a little?

I forgot to add, since bullet length is no longer a limiting factor, I would stay with the 300 gr or heavier bullets, providing of course that your rifle will shoot them. Penetration is far more important than expansion on elk. Use enough bullet to get the job done, IME and IMO stay away from the PowerBelt bullets when hunting elk, unless you can get the 444 flat point to shoot as a last resort.
U.S.A.F. Veteran
NRA Life Member

Offline Semisane

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 569
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #11 on: April 03, 2010, 09:33:25 AM »
I yield to the voice of experience Busta.  Sure can't argue with those groups.

I think you've solved the loose bullet problem with your loading technique (packing the powder/overbore bullets/fiber wad).  How difficult is it to load the .001" over bore bullet?
CLICK ON ME: .
Link to... highchairstands@cox.net

Offline Busta

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2586
  • Gender: Male
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #12 on: April 03, 2010, 10:37:22 AM »
I yield to the voice of experience Busta.  Sure can't argue with those groups.

I think you've solved the loose bullet problem with your loading technique (packing the powder/overbore bullets/fiber wad).  How difficult is it to load the .001" over bore bullet?

Semisane,

They load like buttah! No short starter neccessary, and they go down easier than saboted bullets do. Each rifling land is only engraving the bullet .0005" (half thousandth) on a .001" over bore bullet.

I have used the 350 FPB and 80 gr BH209 for the last couple years in my Huntsman for Michigan Whitetails, I wouldn't be afraid to use them on elk. They have worked excellent on elk by all reports, and I haven't ever read or heard of a bad report. Personally, I think there are better options, if you can get them to shoot in your rifle. Bullshop, No Excuses, and the White bullets if you can find them, with wads under them.

I have shot some very loose fitting saboted bullets with Blackhorn 209 that shot excellent as well. So the tight fitting bullet theory is not the case in every situation, the breech plug design and 209 primer used has the most influence on ignition. One example would be the 275 gr .450" Parker Extreme (Traditions APB100 badged) bullets in the 3 petal sabots. They nearly seated themselves with just the weight of the range rod. Perfect ignition, and very accurate.
U.S.A.F. Veteran
NRA Life Member

Offline efremtags

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2010, 11:55:08 AM »
I am good on primers (using Federal) and I don't think there is any issues with the flash hole (I pulled the plug during shooting and it looked clear)
I am pretty sure I seated the bullets tightly (I didn't slam the rod, but I put my back into each load).

What should I look for regarding the QLA, is there a way to gauge this.

i micd the bullets I have and most of them were under .500". they only exceeded .500 where the base meets the shank.

I am going to give the Thor's a try. I am leaning towards a loose bullet in my bore.

Good fedback, thanks.

Offline Busta

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2586
  • Gender: Male
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2010, 02:49:30 PM »
efremtags,

It would be hard to gauge, but you may be able to see if it is not concentric with the naked eye, or under magnification and a good light.

Both the FPB and THOR are under.500 except for the flared base. This is what allows them to be loaded into all the .50 cal bores. The FPB's base starts at .507", and the THOR will be either .500", .501", .502", .503", depending on what size you need. Get the sample pack and go from there.

I seriously doubt that the bullet is loose in the bore, it will belly out (obturate) and fill the bore at upset.
U.S.A.F. Veteran
NRA Life Member

Offline Buckskins & Black Powder

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1700
  • Gender: Male
    • Buckskins & Black Powder
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #15 on: April 03, 2010, 06:16:21 PM »
a TC not shooting full bore conicals is pretty typical.  Call tc and ask them and they will tell you it wasnt made for conicals.

Offline sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #16 on: April 04, 2010, 10:53:01 AM »
efremtags

I too would question your use of BH with conicals?  BH is a smokeless progressive burning powder and it is an excellent powder.  But to get BH to burn 'progessivly' and correctly the whole gun needs to be pretty much sealed from gas leaks.  A progessive powder can not burn correctly unless it is under constant and consistent pressure.

This sentence(s) leads me to believe you are not achieving that seal with the FPB..

Quote
I am shooting Hornady 350gr FBP. I varied loads from 80 - 110 gr. None of them would group at all. My shots scattered in every direction. I would guess the groups ran 6-7" @ 60yds.
For reference, the bullet loaded pretty easy in my gun. I have heard they are tight in encores, but that was not the case. It wasn't loose, but no more or less difficult than the sabot to load.


Your 6-7" groups are very typical of BH and inconsistent pressure...  I have found if the sabot does not load without a definite feel of pressure - your velocity suffers as does the accuracy.  On the other hand T7 does not require this starting pressure and it will rapidly obturate the conical to the bore completing the gas seal.

I have also found that by using a shot card under the bullet and over the powder consistently provides me with better energy numbers and accuracy.  I use a .125x.510 card.  I do not know if this would help BH-209 or not.

I can tell you that I shoot an Omegas and a Triumph and I do shoot a Bull Shop 460 grain Conical with a shot card , T7 and both guns shoot it very accurately.

If your Encore is one of the newer varieties I doubt that the QLA is not concentric, there was a time early in the production of the Encore/Omega barrels that the QLA’s did get machined incorrectly.  It did give TC a lot of headaches and they did go back and correct the problem.
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - they are a blast....

Offline Buckskin

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2504
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #17 on: April 04, 2010, 12:09:49 PM »
When pray-tell, did TC have this issue? I have probably had mine for about 5 years or so. 
Buckskin

"I have tried to live my life so that my family would love me and my friends respect me. The others can do whatever the hell they please.   --John Wayne

Offline sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #18 on: April 04, 2010, 03:01:14 PM »
Buckskin

It really was about that time maybe a little before that... but when it occured it was a limited number of barrels during a production run.  I think I read that it occured over three days of barrel production before quality control picked up on it.

But you know even though it was in a limited number of barrels it must mean that all barrels are no good, some people just keep dragging it out....
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - they are a blast....

Offline Buckskins & Black Powder

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1700
  • Gender: Male
    • Buckskins & Black Powder
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #19 on: April 04, 2010, 03:13:16 PM »
Call TC, they'll tell you their barrels are made for sabots  ;)  This is a problem on their entire line up with the QLA's.  People have Omega's that wont shoot conicals, Encores, heck even their traditional sidelocks with the QLA have given others fits.

Offline Busta

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2586
  • Gender: Male
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #20 on: April 04, 2010, 06:50:28 PM »
Buckskin

It really was about that time maybe a little before that... but when it occured it was a limited number of barrels during a production run.  I think I read that it occured over three days of barrel production before quality control picked up on it.

But you know even though it was in a limited number of barrels it must mean that all barrels are no good, some people just keep dragging it out....

T/C has had problems with the QLA right out of the gate, around 10 years now, and it has never went completely away. I'm not saying that the T/C cannot shoot conicals, but I would bet that less than 50% of them will do it well. I own and like T/C rifles, so this isn't about that, it is about the QLA.


efremtags

I too would question your use of BH with conicals?  BH is a smokeless progressive burning powder and it is an excellent powder.  But to get BH to burn 'progessivly' and correctly the whole gun needs to be pretty much sealed from gas leaks.  A progessive powder can not burn correctly unless it is under constant and consistent pressure.

This sentence(s) leads me to believe you are not achieving that seal with the FPB..

Quote
I am shooting Hornady 350gr FBP. I varied loads from 80 - 110 gr. None of them would group at all. My shots scattered in every direction. I would guess the groups ran 6-7" @ 60yds.
For reference, the bullet loaded pretty easy in my gun. I have heard they are tight in encores, but that was not the case. It wasn't loose, but no more or less difficult than the sabot to load.


Your 6-7" groups are very typical of BH and inconsistent pressure...  I have found if the sabot does not load without a definite feel of pressure - your velocity suffers as does the accuracy.  On the other hand T7 does not require this starting pressure and it will rapidly obturate the conical to the bore completing the gas seal.

I have also found that by using a shot card under the bullet and over the powder consistently provides me with better energy numbers and accuracy.  I use a .125x.510 card.  I do not know if this would help BH-209 or not.

I can tell you that I shoot an Omegas and a Triumph and I do shoot a Bull Shop 460 grain Conical with a shot card , T7 and both guns shoot it very accurately.

If your Encore is one of the newer varieties I doubt that the QLA is not concentric, there was a time early in the production of the Encore/Omega barrels that the QLA’s did get machined incorrectly.  It did give TC a lot of headaches and they did go back and correct the problem.

Would you mind telling us how many FPB's have you ever shot with Blackhorn 209 or Triple Se7en for that matter? And how many conicals have you shot with Blackhorn 209?


efremtags,

Conicals can be shot with Blackhorn 209 with the right rifle and breech plug. I have been doing it for 2 years, with several types of breech plugs and rifles. My custom breech plugs do it better than any factory plugs however. If you use a good bare primer breech plug with good tight headspace, you can shoot FPB's without a problem. Your rifle may just not like the combination? I would try the 300 gr FPB, the THOR, a different powder or conical before giving up. If you lived near me, I would GIVE you a full container of Triple Se7en, I have way too much of it sitting around collecting dust. I hope you get it figured out, and good luck on your hunt.
U.S.A.F. Veteran
NRA Life Member

Offline Buckskins & Black Powder

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1700
  • Gender: Male
    • Buckskins & Black Powder
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #21 on: April 04, 2010, 08:42:23 PM »
i shoot the easy to load powerbelts with bh209 and have had no trouble at all with  groups. Some of my best groups yet with these rifles and powerbelts  thanks to blackhorn

Offline sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #22 on: April 05, 2010, 06:39:38 AM »
Busta

Quote
Would you mind telling us how many FPB's have you ever shot with Blackhorn 209 or Triple Se7en for that matter? And how many conicals have you shot with Blackhorn 209?

Was this question for me? If so I have never shot an FPB, have no insterest and they are not legal in Idaho. Conicals with BlackHorn - also zero... Conicals with T7 a whole lot.  I am not saying that all conicals can not be shot with BH, I am indicating that i do not think shooting loose fitting concicals with BH will provide you with the best accuracy.

The QLA.... some folks, and you are must be one, really just do like it so it must be bad on every gun. A lot of folks think the same thing about the Knight secondary safety and FPJ's.  And the best part, that is your choice and it is no big deal. But other like those options so I do not see why you and FG need to condemn them as universally bad.  I personally think 'O' rings are a really poor thought also but I am not going around indcating 'O' rings are universally bad and there are better ways to solve the problem.

I am fortunate, I happen to have two TC's that shoot conicals, well Bullshops, just great with T7, and again I have not tried them with BH.  It was my thought because of the progressive burn that I would not achieve obturation of the bullet fast enough to prevent skipping lands and grooves, and then if it were and ill fitting conical that would accentuate the problem.

Question? Would you as a BH shooter expect the best accuracy with a sabot bullet combination that slipped down the bore with minimal pressure or a combination that went down with a tighter fitting combination?  The kicker here is that the polymer sabot has a better chance to obturate much faster than does a conical.

And just for the record I did have a Hawken with a QLA and Bullshop Dan has a Hawken with a QLA - neither of us has a problem shooting his .504/460 Bullshops from them.

 
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - they are a blast....

Offline Buckskins & Black Powder

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1700
  • Gender: Male
    • Buckskins & Black Powder
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #23 on: April 05, 2010, 07:35:05 AM »
6-7" groups would tell me that the QLA is screwed up.  Then again, i was wrong one time. A guy had the same issue with an encore, cut the QLA off and nothing helped. Turned out his forearm has small cracks running through out the forearm and the lock up springs were to weak.  Talk about an expensive brand new, bend me over the counter screw up on TC's part.

Offline Busta

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2586
  • Gender: Male
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #24 on: April 05, 2010, 08:10:27 AM »
saotloader,

Thanks for your answer.
U.S.A.F. Veteran
NRA Life Member

Offline TooTall

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #25 on: April 05, 2010, 12:57:32 PM »

Offline efremtags

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #26 on: April 05, 2010, 01:33:54 PM »
Thanks everyone for the feedback. My first steps will be to scope my rifle for load development (already completed) and get me some 300GR FRB n some 250 and 300gr thors and go back to the drawing board.

for reference, am I mistaken or are the FRB and thors not technically conical but Mine-balls. The difference being a lot of the bullets mention required a shot card to form a valid seal, but these bullets should expand and self seal. Isn't that the point of the concave base.

For reference, I measured my sabot loads and they are the same overall length as the FRB, but about .05 wider. My FRB measure under .500". My gut is telling me that is the problem here. From what I have read on QLA, the problem seems to exist regardless of sabot or not, and my sabot loads shot fantastic.

I wish I had a chrony, the velocity spread would tell me everything about ignition issues if the case is gas seal related.

Offline sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #27 on: April 05, 2010, 02:37:26 PM »
bigblock455

Quote
Then again, i was wrong one time.

I think that just about sums up a whole lot about you....
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - they are a blast....

Offline Buckskins & Black Powder

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1700
  • Gender: Male
    • Buckskins & Black Powder
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #28 on: April 06, 2010, 02:28:57 PM »
For a test i ran 70gr BH209 out of my Optima and loaded up some 360gr lee minie's. These are .500" and load with finger pressure, Not cool to hunt with as it may move off the charge, but fine for the range. At 50 yards i had 3 touching. I recovered 2 of them out of the sand box as well and the bases are flared out with deep rifling engraved into the lead. BH209 works perfectly fine with even a easy slip fit conical.

Honestly, If i were you, i would give TC a call and see what they think. I also would send it in for inspection. $20 to have them look at it is better than blowing $20-30 worth of shooting supplies and not getting anywhere.

Offline grouse

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
Re: ENCORE PRO-HUNTER HELP
« Reply #29 on: April 06, 2010, 04:34:16 PM »
A QLA should be on every Muzzleloader. Anytime someone cant get a T/C to shoot, they blame it on the QLA. I watch the same thing with savages, mine wont shoot??? They spend tons of money and replace barrels??? I would love to own all those guns that don't shoot. Most people don't take the time to find the right Powder,Bullet, sabot combination for there particular gun. Conicals and BH209 is not a good combination. Though it works well for some, most wont find it to be very effective with Conicals.