There are many reason that one can come up with here. Personally I own 2, a 7600 and a H&R.
Gun writers have a lot to do with it. The .35 is a little less than the .338 and a little more than the 06. That said, 35's have always been one of those calibers that American hunters seem to ignore. Eastern deer hunters don't need the power so it leaves that crowd out. Many Eastern hunters would be more than happy with the .358 Winchester, one of the most overlooker deer cartridges and one of the most capable.
The trajectory of the Whelen (not Whelan, as I found my H&R listed) is a little too much of a rainbow for serious mule deer hunters and elk hunters already have the .338.
So where do you use the .35? Even Alaska has its favorites: 06, .338 & .375.
Well the handloader knows the potential of the round. I can load .357 pistol bullets or 150-300 grain bullets. The round is slightly underloaded in its factory configuration and when Remington first started out they
offered a 200 grain spire point and a 250 round nose. What was needed to appease the elk hunters was the 225 spitzer or the 250.
Recoil is about the same as the 06 up to the 225's. The 250 and 300 are going to get your attention but in a hunting situation one rarely remembers the gun recoiling. Your mind is on other things. The recoil is more of a push than the sharp butt of the .338.
Properly loaded with a good 225 grain bullet the round really shines. The affects of the bullet on game is devestating as other will attest too. I have never recoverd one from a caribou. The one moose I hit, the bullet was destroyed or lost when we processed the animal in the river.
I love the round, it is just a "slightly less than everything else round". Other yardsticks were created to measure cartridges by before it was factorized. Writers went oh humm.....
Got any for sale? :grin: