I had Gary do quite a bit of work on my .41 Mag Blackhawk, plus another cylinder in .41 GNR. All the workmanship was top notch & they were a pleasure to work with. I know Gary is incredibly busy, so it's not too early to be sending in your revolver in order to hunt with it this fall.
I had the extra cylinder made because I wasn't sure about the GNR chambering. I've not killed anything with it yet (only 'cause I've gotten a newer toy). I'd have to say that I'm firmly in the heavy bullet/slower velocity camp, but I wanted to try the GNR chambering 'cause I like all things .41. It is a cool cartridge & the performance is certainly there, although so is the muzzle blast! WOW! I simply cannot imagine shooting this without serious ear protection.
I know several users of the 41 GNR have experimented with heavier bullets and really like what they're getting. So far, I've just messed with the recommended 170's and a bit with 210's. I personally like the .41 Mag loaded with 250 & 265's so the 170's scccreeeaaming out was / is a different ballgame.
If I had it to do over again, I'd probably pass on the .41 GNR though not because of workmanship or anything related to Reeder. I am interested in the .356 GNR as I feel it would firmly put the .357 over into deer sized game under all conditions. Plus I like the smaller physical size of most revolvers chambered for .357. And, of course, it's a chambering I don't have.........
Reloading the .41 GNR is a cinch & Reeder supplies good basic data.
My two & a half cents worth.
MadBadger