Author Topic: Remington R1 1911  (Read 6371 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mrussel

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #30 on: July 27, 2010, 09:58:53 PM »
The guts and parts make a difference.
I like what STI does with parts---they are probably as close to an SVI as you can get.
Now that is not the Spartan but the guts are.
Again, we are going to disagree on the internals and how important they are.
Blessings
 

 Not at all,I fully agree the internals are very important. The issue was whether the Spartan would be good to built up. My thought was,if your going to gut it and replace all the decent internals with top of the line parts,what difference does it make what the roll mark is if the frame and slide come off the same assemble line. Of course its also true that we dont know whether that is true or not.
 
 As an example,there are milling machines made in china. They range from the junk they sell at Harbor Freight that wont even work without alot of work done by the purchaser,to the stuff that is OK,to stuff that is really good. It all comes out of the same factory. The companies in china can make you anything from junk to top quality products. It all depends on what you ask them for and how much your willing to pay. It may be that the armscor slides and frames are made out of better quality materials. The RIA frame and slide are ok. They do their job and I haven't heard of anyone having a failure. (I'm sure they do fail,but its not common enough that I have heard about it. Ive heard of a safety coming loose but not cracked slides. Ive heard of some guns that DO commonly have things like cracked slides. ) Still,I was considering what I could put a 460 Rowland conversion in,and the Springfield (one of my favorites,especially at about 500 for a GI) was on the list of recommended guns. The RIA was one that they said defiantly do NOT do it to. (The RIA factory people tell the same story. Not just "its not recommended and it voids the warranty" but instead, "Dont do it,or it WILL destroy the gun") If the STI uses the same slide and frame as the RIA (if its actually a better quality part,just made in the same factory,that's a different story. Investment casting is not a bad thing. If I recall,FN went to cast frames on the 40S&W Hi Power to make it STRONGER. Its just a matter of what steel you use for the cast and how you heat treat it after its made. (They made other changes as well,so thats not the whole story,but it demonstrates the point)

 If I was looking for a low cost 1911 to start with for a build,I would look at the springfields before I looked at the RIA,or the STI IF (and that's a big if) its the same frame and slide as a RIA. On the other hand,even if it IS the same frame,if (as people are saying) the STI is good (I dont really know alot about it other than what I have heard about the frames. The guy at the gun store showed me a really expensive one though and it was really nice),and I wanted something that I wasn't going to mess with much,then it would be something to look at.

Offline williamlayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15415
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #31 on: July 28, 2010, 01:22:21 PM »
How it is put together OR how skilled it is put together is a subject not often considered.
I am not sure that I would want a cast frme/slide for anything as big or larger than a 10mm---but There are some good casting out there.
Blessings
TEXAS, by GOD

Offline mrussel

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #32 on: July 28, 2010, 09:22:49 PM »
How it is put together OR how skilled it is put together is a subject not often considered.
I am not sure that I would want a cast frme/slide for anything as big or larger than a 10mm---but There are some good casting out there.
Blessings

 What about injection molding?  :) Its kinda like casting,but with plastic.

Offline His lordship.

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1018
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #33 on: August 05, 2010, 01:43:16 PM »
It may be assembled in the USA, but where are the parts made?

Offline deerman12

  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 384
  • Gender: Male
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #34 on: August 26, 2010, 08:16:54 AM »
My friend and I both bought one.  Great 45 for the money.  I paid $580 for mine.  We have both fired ours a couple of hundred times.  Not one single jamb.  Both of these group very well with 230grain HP.  My other 45 is a kimber.  I have to say I like it dang near as well!  I paid $950 for the kimber.  Quality in my opinion.

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #35 on: September 02, 2010, 04:41:49 AM »
Lets not forget this company never produced 1911's.  Now its the longevity we need to look at.  Most people don't shoot many rounds out of there guns.

Example; One time i had only 750rds for my 30-06 and i reloaded them twice so (banned site) hunting rifle has 1,500rds thru it and its still accurate as the day i first shot it, well reloaded for it.  My point is time will tell if its a safe queen or its well used.  We shoot everything here alot.

I never broke the $500 mark for a good 1911 yet.  Maybe i been lucky so far? My new AO was only $389.

Offline seezee

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #36 on: October 20, 2010, 02:33:30 PM »
Bought one of the new Remingtons R11s about a month ago. It is BUILT IN THE USA not made in the USA. It has a cast frame and it is series 80. Which is a pain in the rear for me. Lots of burrs and the slide release didn't work. It wouldn't free it's self from the slide. I could have fixed that but by that time I had had it. Didn't shoot it and took it back the next day. Had to trade it in as a used gun because the dearler had already done his paper work. Was glad to be rid of it. Just not as good as it looks plus the deception of it being made in the USA pissed me off so back it went.
Taurus PT1911 makes the Rem look like a toy as far as I'm concerned.
Good luck and keep your powder dry

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #37 on: October 21, 2010, 04:10:07 PM »
Bought one of the new Remingtons R11s about a month ago. It is BUILT IN THE USA not made in the USA. It has a cast frame and it is series 80. Which is a pain in the rear for me. Lots of burrs and the slide release didn't work. It wouldn't free it's self from the slide. I could have fixed that but by that time I had had it. Didn't shoot it and took it back the next day. Had to trade it in as a used gun because the dearler had already done his paper work. Was glad to be rid of it. Just not as good as it looks plus the deception of it being made in the USA pissed me off so back it went.
Taurus PT1911 makes the Rem look like a toy as far as I'm concerned.
Good luck and keep your powder dry

This doesn't sound good for the new 1911 from Remington already getting returns and trade in's??? We must remember this company never manufactured 1911's. I would think there going to have bumps in the road but not that bad.

Offline shootergdv

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #38 on: November 03, 2010, 09:15:44 AM »
Bought one, slightly used, maybe a box of shells through it. I've fired 700+ through it since, ball, LRN reloads, SWC reloads with no malfunctions yet. I may even clean it in another 1000 rounds or so. Don't really know why the front sight was made windage adjustable, my personal preference is plain sights, but painting over the dots is easy enough. Like to see it with a fully adjustable rear sight.
Will need some trigger work, my example is kinda mushy. Now I have the urge to step out back and run a few more through it at the plate rack !

Offline odoh

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 195
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #39 on: November 10, 2010, 06:17:44 AM »
Chrome lined bores were essential to the soviet block countries as well as china because of their corrosive ammo. Our ans to our WW2 corrosive ammo on the garands was usage of stainsless steel of selected gas system components as well as good cleaning disipline.  Haven't had to resort to cheap ammo in my guns but most are stainsless anyway.

Offline shootergdv

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #40 on: December 10, 2010, 08:21:54 AM »
Well over 1000 reloads through it with no cleaning yet. Still hate the sights but according to the folks at Brownell's , nobody makes a replacement set yet that slides in. Neither dovetail is  the size of anyone else's dangit . That woulda been too easy. Overall still OK but time I haveta machine for replacement sights and get a really good trigger may push the cost of a used Kimber anyway.  First I'll completely fill in the white dots and file down the front sight to raise the elevation. All in all, real dependable, just nothing extra.

Offline tomray

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 79
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #41 on: December 16, 2010, 02:52:08 AM »
Bought one of the new Remingtons R11s about a month ago. It is BUILT IN THE USA not made in the USA. It has a cast frame Good luck and keep your powder dry

The main parts are MIM (Metal injection Molded) and made by  Indo-Mim in India........

Tom

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: Remington R1 1911
« Reply #42 on: December 16, 2010, 05:25:20 AM »
When i was working for a machine tool company we set up a company in india manufacturing our older discontinued vertical turret lathes.  While we got royalties we did bring there machine into our shop and set it up and tested it.  We found out that india really manufactured a good quality castiron and made a decent copy of our older machine.  They matched it exactly. Most stuff is manufactured over seas right now because of the inviromental backlash if they were manufactured here.  The companies just can't pollute here anymore and get away with it so they move over seas and do it there.  But the air is still our air that we breathe and it does go around the world anyhoo.

I believe that 4140 steel casting is just as good as 4140 machined from a solid block "if" and only "if" the casting is done correctly.  Companies do try to skip processes to save $$ and that is why the product gets a bad rap.  I don't think that any companies now are using a quality control inspection department anymore.

There are advantages of using a chrome line bore in the barrel too.  They can use a lesser grade steel for the barrel when the bore is chrome lined.  They can probably skip a hardening process too because the chrome is a hard industrial chrome. Outside of the chroming process its cheap to manufacture them at the sametime its a plus for reducing wear too, besides for corrosive ammo.