Author Topic: metric vs imperial systems  (Read 4026 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #60 on: April 29, 2010, 12:40:40 PM »
in sweden they are 45x95
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry

Offline GGaskill

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5668
  • Gender: Male
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #61 on: April 29, 2010, 01:20:51 PM »
So even in the heart of metric land, the actual sizes aren't an easy to use 50x100 but 45x95.  Not many factors of ten in those numbers.   ;D

By the way, 16/32 was a typo; should have been 15/32.
GG
“If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.”
--Winston Churchill

Offline carronader

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
  • Gender: Male
  • What? me worry.
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #62 on: April 29, 2010, 01:51:43 PM »
Gary .....how do you know your sights are marked in Arshins    an Arshin is Russian step , pace.    Russians wouldn't write Arshins in English script   it would be like this ' аршин '                                  нщг огые пще ьу сгкшщгыю  :P
Scottish by birth and by heart.

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12607
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #63 on: April 29, 2010, 01:55:00 PM »
Mosin rifles don't go here even disguised a 7.65 cannons

Offline RocklockI

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2747
  • Gender: Male
  • Morko and Me
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #64 on: April 29, 2010, 02:08:37 PM »
Well , I bet they aimmed their Unicorn cannons in Arshins too ......

Gary
"I've seen too much not to stay in touch , With a world full of love and luck, I got a big suspicion 'bout ammunition I never forget to duck" J.B.

Offline gulfcoastblackpowder

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 808
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #65 on: April 29, 2010, 03:55:26 PM »
So even in the heart of metric land, the actual sizes aren't an easy to use 50x100 but 45x95.  Not many factors of ten in those numbers.   ;D

By the way, 16/32 was a typo; should have been 15/32.
What's more, saying you need to buy a fifty-by-one-hundred takes a lot more effort than a two-by-four.

Offline Cat Whisperer

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7493
  • Gender: Male
  • Pulaski Coehorn Works
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #66 on: April 29, 2010, 05:29:02 PM »
whats the difference between 1/2" and 16/32" ??

Dimensionally, no difference.

BUT, plywood that once was 1/2" (or 16/32") is now slightly thinner, 15/32.
How many mm?  12.5 or 13?
Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)

Offline GGaskill

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5668
  • Gender: Male
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #67 on: April 29, 2010, 06:50:50 PM »
.50 cal is 12.7 mm so the 15/32" is really close to 12 mm (11.906 mm, less than .004" difference.).
GG
“If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.”
--Winston Churchill

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #68 on: April 29, 2010, 08:34:12 PM »
yes 12 it is

the best so far is that 1" is 3 barley grains long

anyone who know what one meter is ??
its actually 1/10 000 000 of the distance from the north pole to the equator  ;D

but all antique drawings are messured in calibers , so there we got a third way to messuring things  :o
all smaller messurements are shown in 1/16 part of the bore
so all astragals and fillets are most often 1/16 bore diameter wide
thats something to think about if you are designing your own barrel
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry

Offline Victor3

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: metric vs imperial systems--why we keep the old one
« Reply #69 on: April 30, 2010, 01:00:42 AM »
There is a vast investment in imperial based machinery in American industry.  Changing it all to metric just for the hell of it makes no sense.  On top of that, there are industrial standards that govern things such as thread pitches versus fastener diameters.  Even within the metric world, there are several differing ones.  So switching to the use of metric measurements does not make everyone in the world compatible in everything.

 What vast investment in inch machines are you speaking of that can't either already be used to make metric parts or be cost-effectively adapted to do so?

 Most of the 100's of older conventional machines still online at the factory I work at were originally designed in inches but we now make a mix of mm & inch threaded/dimensioned parts on them. The gears, cams, dies, cutting tools, etc. used with them are generally perishable items that are all made in mm today at no higher cost. Inch/mm doesn't matter to a CNC or to a conventional fitted with a DRO.

 ISO Metric threads are used pretty much universally on all new-made stuff, so interchangeability won't be a problem for much longer. ISO M series already mates with some of the popular obsloete metric threads anyway.

 I don't think other countries changed over "just for the hell of it." Musta been some kinda financial incentive to do so. We in the US seem to be the only dinosaurs that don't know we're extinct yet.
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly, one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."

Sherlock Holmes

Offline carronader

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
  • Gender: Male
  • What? me worry.
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #70 on: April 30, 2010, 01:56:52 AM »
the UK fought long and hard to keep Imperial   but it's a requirement of European Union to use Metric. it makes sense really when you have one system for trade and manufacturng. Financial penalty if you didn't accept it. UK had to enforce it, Frogs were pushing for penalty over Uk dragging it's feet. Worked out ok for me  ;D I can measure in Yank and Frog. If you are working with old Dutch..German ..Russkie drawings you will soon find out the benefit of one system , you got to be so carefull with scale and proportion, while I'm on that point........with old drawings....Check  Check  and check again  lots of these drawings must have been done by artists , amateurs or total idiots   proportion of wheel to trail -  barrel to wheel -space between trails to accept full width of trunnions ( when twin trail )  (cheeks when single trail)  trust nothing         wood has this bad habit of staying cut.   metal is same.
Scottish by birth and by heart.

Offline Victor3

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #71 on: April 30, 2010, 09:49:50 PM »
 At least some of the younger folks in the US are starting to understand the value of the metric system...

http://www.theonion.com/articles/metric-system-thriving-in-nations-inner-cities,458/

"For some unfathomable reason, the U.S. is the only major industrialized nation in the world not using the metric system," said Dr. Michael Lenzi of UCLA's Center For Statistical Data. "At long last, it appears that the metric system is being embraced by a progressive segment of the population outside the scientific community."
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly, one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."

Sherlock Holmes

Offline Terry C.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1215
  • Gender: Male
  • I see what you did there...
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #72 on: May 01, 2010, 02:29:10 AM »
I was shaking my head at that article, until I noticed it was from "The Onion." ::)

Sadly, though, it's not that far from the truth.

But fear not, Imperial System, for there is hope! The gangstas would be lost without their Glock "fo-tays" in their waistbands (which is generally about mid-thigh).

Offline gulfcoastblackpowder

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 808
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #73 on: May 01, 2010, 04:20:20 AM »
I was shaking my head at that article, until I noticed it was from "The Onion." ::)

Sadly, though, it's not that far from the truth.

But fear not, Imperial System, for there is hope! The gangstas would be lost without their Glock "fo-tays" in their waistbands (which is generally about mid-thigh).
Quote
The cookie test was cut short by the disappearance of 25 scales, but results are still being called "conclusive."

 ;D

Offline Cat Whisperer

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7493
  • Gender: Male
  • Pulaski Coehorn Works
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #74 on: May 01, 2010, 08:12:01 AM »
...
"For some unfathomable reason, the U.S. is ...."

The reason can be understood in one word: congress.

Edit:  oops, sorry for the out of place winging about politics.
Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #75 on: May 01, 2010, 12:04:59 PM »
Quote
is there any easy way to learn how it works ??

No easy way at all, but we do expect the entire world to switch to imperial and do it immediately.

Mixups between metric and imperial is the reason the Hubble telescope was screwed up the first time around.
I presume you know that the Imperial measurements are not the same as the American ones in several cases. ie gallon quart,pint, fld oz, tons that come to my mind right now.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #76 on: May 01, 2010, 12:27:19 PM »
I remember Whitworth spanners (wrenches)  were in fractions   damn useless   could always find one or two in peoples toolbox   were only good for hammering onto a rounded nut or bolt. Always big , heavy made. 

Whilst metric and Standard(US) wrenches are measured to fit the opposite flat sides of a bolt head. The Whitworth are measured from the opposite pointy sides and are meant to be used with Whitworth fasteners. A good example would be the old British Seagull Outboards. 
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #77 on: May 01, 2010, 03:37:20 PM »
seagull ??
is that a more powered outboard engine than the evinrude ??
I remember the evinrude from disneys bernard and bianca

or is it a smaller type plane from albatross airlines  ;D
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry

Offline GGaskill

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5668
  • Gender: Male
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #78 on: May 01, 2010, 06:45:43 PM »
The real reason we haven't completely converted to metric is that it really offers no advantage.  Inch screws and bolts work just as well as metric ones.
GG
“If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.”
--Winston Churchill

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #79 on: May 02, 2010, 01:54:34 AM »
yes they do ,
as long as you dont stand in the middle of nowhere in a "metric" country and need spare parts

so a world standard would be good , metric or imperial really doesnt matter
but as it is just usa and burma who uses the imperial today it would be easier to change to metric
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry

Offline Artilleryman

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1378
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #80 on: May 02, 2010, 02:38:09 AM »
Back in junior high school I was told by my math and science teachers that the US would convert to metric within ten years.  Each year as I went through high school and then college I was told the US would convert within ten years.  Fifty years later....................
Norm Gibson, 1st SC Vol., ACWSA

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #81 on: May 02, 2010, 03:07:49 AM »
yes , why change something thats working
but I guess that also usa will change to metric
maybe not as long as we are living
everything comes closer and closer to world standards
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry

Offline Victor3

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #82 on: May 02, 2010, 03:39:55 AM »
so a world standard would be good , metric or imperial really doesnt matter...

 I beg to differ, Dan...

 The Metric system has only 7 basic measures. The Imperial has over 300 and they are often ambiguous.

 If only for simplicity's sake, we in the US should get with the program.
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly, one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."

Sherlock Holmes

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #83 on: May 02, 2010, 04:14:04 AM »
yes I prefer the metric system , but Ive been brought up with it so all feel natural and logic to me
could be different with you americans I suppose
now when you mention those figures I really dont understand why you still use it
but ok Ive also seen discussions here at the board where native americans seem to have had problems to really understand it a few times
so I guess that I dont need to be ashame when I need to think twice sometimes and even use the calculator to really understand what you are talking about
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry

Offline Cat Whisperer

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7493
  • Gender: Male
  • Pulaski Coehorn Works
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #84 on: May 02, 2010, 04:35:37 AM »
Exactly.

(Most of us have been cussing fractions for our lifetimes!)

When I was a professor, I could readily tell which of my older students were machinists and which were tool makers - just by their knowledge of fractions.  I.e.: did they know the decimal equivalents of 16ths, 32nds or 1/64ths.  That instantly told me the level of accuracty they routinely delt with in their experiences.
Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)

Offline Zulu

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2477
  • Honor is a gift a man gives himself.
    • Wood & Ironworks
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #85 on: May 02, 2010, 04:39:10 AM »
Iv'e only been cussing them for about 2/3's of my life. ;D
Zulu
Zulu's website
www.jmelledge.com

Offline subdjoe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Gender: Male
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #86 on: May 02, 2010, 08:50:27 AM »
so a world standard would be good , metric or imperial really doesnt matter...

 I beg to differ, Dan...

 The Metric system has only 7 basic measures. The Imperial has over 300 and they are often ambiguous.

 If only for simplicity's sake, we in the US should get with the program.

yeah!

Now, how many femtograms of H380 do I need for a 7.69 Brit, 11.7 gram RN, to get it to 701 mps?
Your ob't & etc,
Joseph Lovell

Justice Robert H. Jackson - It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #87 on: May 02, 2010, 09:40:09 AM »


You could use 2.83 grams of Norma 203 for 774 m/sec

  Man !! There are manuals out there in metric.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline GGaskill

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5668
  • Gender: Male
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #88 on: May 02, 2010, 10:36:45 AM »
Well, the original question was how many femtograms ....  But with the metric system, it's just a simple shift of the decimal point (after you look up what a femto- is [10-15]); 2.83 x 1015 femtograms (although an inappropriate unit for this quantity.)   ;D
GG
“If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.”
--Winston Churchill

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: metric vs imperial systems
« Reply #89 on: May 02, 2010, 02:07:08 PM »
thats real bs , femtograms is a non existing unit in practical use
maybe in theoretical higher math

smallest unit used is gram , 1 gram is 15,43 grains I think

for smaller weights you just use 0,00076 for example
or milligram = 1/1000 gram but who actually use that ?  microgram is smaller
I will never open any drug factory
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry