diesel in a gas truck ? if it says 45acp on the box its not diesel !
mrussel, wasn't picking on you (sorry it struck a nerve) just stating what I expected in a gun . If my expectations are higher than others so be it . I just don't accept second rate work. If a company puts a gun on the market it should work with little fuss. That's not to say one out of 1000 won't have a problem ( i have had several guns with a problem from Ruger , Browning ,Winchester and S&W but it was not the norm ) . The difference in cost should be in finish , fit and group size not wheather the gun will cycle or not or if it will shoot normal ammo. If the gun will only shoot a certian ammo then the seller should point that out to the buyer . The Seacamp 32 was built for Winchester ammo a great example.
And William running a race car on the street ask for break downs and poor preformance , trust me I tried it for years . Today its a pretty much box stock truck and weapon . No extended anything , flaired what ever or super dooper anything just want it to shoot where i point it every time !Oh yea and the truck to get me where i need to go. If I want to dress something up , I'll take the wife shopping
No offense taken. Didn't feel I was being picked on,just seemed like you got a little worked up over cheap guns.
As far as the gun only shooting certain ammo,you are correct,it should be made clear. Nothing beats full disclosure,and while some companies dont seem to realize it,disclosing the limitation of your products is going to go better in the long term. You might get a few more sales initially,but then your going to get a rep for being junk because your customers expectations wont be met. It is true that some manufacturers will tell you when asked (others give you the run around,and of course the "good" brands just feed it without a problem) but I cant argue there. Of course,the gun stores I shop at have clerks that are very forthcoming about the good and the bad of the guns they carry,but that's why I choose to shop there. (actually,the owners manual of the RIA does say that its not intended to feed hollow points,but it IS buried in there and they could have made it more prominent or in fact they COULD just change the feed ramp)
I do in fact own an RIA,and in fact I love it. The reason of course is,I went in knowing exactly what it was,and expecting far less from it than what it turned out to give. Thats why I constantly make certain to mention,don't expect it to be a 1500 dollar gun. (I hear some people going on about how they would "Put their RIA up against a top end 1911 any day",and I always chime in with those who say,"No way,its not even in the same league") What it does is go bang every time I pull the trigger. Thats what I expect from it,within the limitations of what I know it will feed. Its mechanically reliable. Im not going to pretend its something that I can do a thousand dollars of mods to. That would be absurd. About the only thing I would consider is having it taken care of so it can feed other kinds of hollow points. (even that Im not really worried about,it feeds XTPs just fine,so why rock the boat)
I do agree,if I bought a 1911 thinking it would feed hollow points,the gun store I bought it from didn't tell me,and then I found it jammed every round,and I had to go through box after box of premium ammo to find one that would work,IF I could find one that would work,I would be upset. I think its all about expectations. For example,I considered buying one of the 140 dollar High Point 9mm to play with. I have certain expections that I want to be met. I could live with a few jams,as it would just be a toy. If it went bank MOST of the time,then I would live with it. I'm not competing with it,and I certainly would carry it. (I have an old french 32acp pistol that I wouldnt carry either. Its fun to shoot,but I feel that the mechanism to hold back the striker just is not safe enough to carry and that it could discharge if dropped.) I expect and demand that it be safe to fire. If it sometimes (it only takes once) puts the slide in your forehead,that's unacceptable of course. (I haven't heard of anyone having one blow up,so that seems OK) The one thing I could not get past is the Zamak slide. I have a lathe that has Zamak gears and a few Zamak brackets. IT was made just before WWII and is a damn good piece of equipment. The Zamak parts are actually made to fail,to protect the "expensive" parts. (Ok,80 years later,those Zamak parts are getting pricey) In that application,the only time a Zamak party typically breaks,is when otherwise something critical would have broke. Zamak was a good way to protect the critical parts,as well as reduce costs. The slide on a gun does not meet those criteria. I just cant get myself to spend my money on a gun with Zamak parts. (Far better to spend my money on an old com-block gun,that was made like a Russian tank.)