Author Topic: Sks load data  (Read 1893 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline neon frizzen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Sks load data
« on: November 24, 2003, 11:25:00 AM »
does annybody have a good 7.62x39 load worked up I have an old speer book. My first attempt was 28 grns imr 4895 behind a 123 grn bullet. The gun won't cycle all the time and only ejects about half as far as russian ammo. to me imr 4895 just doesn't seem to be the right kind of powder for such a small round. I know most probably don't reload this round because surpluss ammo is pretty cheap. But I just enjoy loading it myself
TIA

Offline richp41

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Sks load data
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2003, 12:31:00 PM »
4895 is too slow for the 7.63x39 with 123 gr bullets. Try H4198 and follow recommendations in the Hodgdon reloading guide or website.

Offline jgalar

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1231
  • Gender: Male
Sks load data
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2003, 12:51:39 PM »
I don't have the load data anymore, but the best groups I got out of my sks were using sierra .308 110 grain HPs using accurate 1680 powder.

4198 either h or or imr works well also.

The darn russian stuff is so cheap I dont reload for it anymore.

Offline eroyd

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 300
Sks load data
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2003, 01:15:53 PM »
Is reloading for the SKS worth it? I found mine was hard on brass and besides surplus ammo is cheap. It however would be (is) a nice cartridge in some other light rifles and single shot pistols.

Offline Catahoula

  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 85
Sks load data
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2003, 05:05:41 PM »
I use just under 31 grains of H335 under a Remington 125 grain soft point, in Remington brass.  Very reliable and accurate, but I'm shooting it out of a mini-30, not an SKS.  I hand load for the 7.62X39 because I haven't found any surplus ammunition that will group under 4-5 inches out of my gun, probably due to the .310 diameter bullet.  Handloads with .308 diameter  Remingtons easily hold under 2", and often do better.

Offline Txredneck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Sks load data
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2003, 02:39:30 AM »
Try accurate #1680. This powder was developed specifically for this round. It works great in mine. It's also pretty good in the 454 casull.
  :D

Offline thecowboyace

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 94
Sks load data
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2003, 04:52:11 AM »
Quote from: Catahoula
I use just under 31 grains of H335 under a Remington 125 grain soft point, in Remington brass.  Very reliable and accurate, but I'm shooting it out of a mini-30, not an SKS.  I hand load for the 7.62X39 because I haven't found any surplus ammunition that will group under 4-5 inches out of my gun, probably due to the .310 diameter bullet.  Handloads with .308 diameter  Remingtons easily hold under 2", and often do better.
I have a gun that runs opposite of yours.  I have an Mini30 that slugged out to .3102.  With the .310 and the .311 bullets I get a much better grouping out of it than when using a smaller bullet.  Have you had yours slugged?  I know what they say from the factory all barrels are .xyz but until slugged one really doesn't know what size bullet to use.  Also one needs micrometer and not calipers when reading the slugs.

Offline Robert357

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 410
Sks load data
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2003, 04:11:48 PM »
Neon F:

I use Hodgdon 4895 powder on a 7.62x39 load with a 125 grain Remington SP, winchester brass, winchester Large Rifle Primer.  I don't use the IMR.
For H-4895, I have found 28.7grains (max load from MFg is 29.0 grains) of H-4895 powder to reliaby cycle the SKS that I have.  

What I found is that loads below 28.0 grains didn't reliable cycle the SKS.  I also found that the brass was mostly full of powder, not a compressed load, but almost!

I would concur that other powders are better, but the Hodgdon 4895 works well enough for me.  

I used H-4895 because I had it for my 30-30 and 30-06.  I also tried Alliant 2400 in my 7.62x39, but couldn't get reliable cycling without exceeding the manufacturer's recommended max powder setting.

You might try Steve's Page to see what he says he has tried.  He has some extensive SKS loading info.  Becareful and always watch for signs of overpressure in your load work-up.

Eroyd;
I also use the cheap ammo when I just want to plink or shoot at the range or loan the rifle to one of my sons.  However, I also purchased the rifle so that they could go deer hunting with it.  That is why I handload.  With the handloads, I get better accuracy, because I tuned the load to the rifle and I have a "better" quality hunting bullet in 0.310 diameter than most of the cheap commercial ammo.  Prior to handloading, I would buy Federal hunting ammo, which was pretty expensive and not as accurate as the stuff I handload.  Handloading is not always about price, it can be about accuracy or being able to use a better hunting bullet.  Good luck and enjoy you SKS.

Offline thecowboyace

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 94
Sks load data
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2003, 04:39:08 PM »
May as well tack this on, it is most fulfulling, fun, use your brain a little.  Beats thinking about work a 8:00pm