Beware this can become reality Found out this is not true

[ourway77]

 Subject: FW:  Found out this is not true. I E-Mailed the person who sent it. Who is usually reliable. sorry for the misinformation. I have replied to him of this. Lou


 

 




 


 

 

While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN.( Not True









 
 
 
 
 
 

[billy_56081]

Although I do believe BHO would use this tactic as an end run around the constitution, the part about using the oil spill to distract us is wrong. The article is dated October 2009.

[Skunk]

Ourway77, I appreciate that you got it straightened out and updated your post.

[vabowhntr]

While no treaty has been signed, there are meetings on small arms controls at the UN this month and next.  Clinton did say last Oct that our country would change its stance and no longer oppose a treaty, as Amb Bolton and the previous administration had done for years.  Without their opposing the treaty, we could already be living under one now.

[mrussel]

While no treaty has been signed, there are meetings on small arms controls at the UN this month and next.  Clinton did say last Oct that our country would change its stance and no longer oppose a treaty, as Amb Bolton and the previous administration had done for years.  Without their opposing the treaty, we could already be living under one now.

Its a rumor that's been going around for DECADES and its false. Its always been moot because even alot of people that might be convinced that gun bans were reasonable will not accept other countries dictating it to us. They would lose so much support that it would be impossible to ratify. Without that it has no force. The executive branch could sigh all the treaties it wanted,but without the senates support,its DOA. Its also moot now. Its also impossible to try to secretly ratify a treaty. The rumor was made by people who dont understand how the government works.

 The whole thing is moot anyway. The Supreme Court has affirmed we have the right to own guns for self defense. Over the next few years they will hammer out exactly what those rights entail and what the limits of regulation are,but from what we have seen so far, laws designed to prevent you from having a gun will fail. (The new law in Chicago I expect to fail because they require that any handgun owner in the city get a permit and take a training class,that the law itself prevents anyone in the city from offering.)