This morning I am watching the news and scanning the internet and I keep seeing war this and longest war that, and it makes me think about something I have been wondering something for a long time now and maybe you guys can answer it for me.
When we were in WW1 we fought the Germans,
WW2 we fought the Germans, Japan, and Italy
Korean war the Koreans
Vietnam war the Vietnamese
ECT, ECT, ECT
All the wars fought were against governments of other countries and the military's and when the government was brought down or surrendered it is pretty much over.
Now to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, we started to fight the established governments but beat the very quickly (no more fighting a government or a military). We are fighting against terrorist for the most part, maybe a local here and there, but not the gov. or their military.
I guess what I am trying to say is why do we still call it the Iraq war or the Afgan. war, when we are fighting along side of their new gov. and militaries ( named a war on terror I can accept but that is not what it is called).
I dont want to hear that it is because we are still there, we still have bases in Japan, German and many other places we fought through out the world, but these wars are concerted done and we are still there.
All we are doing is helping protect against civil unrest at this point not really fighting a war, is their something political for continuing to call it a war? Just something that I have been annoyed about lately and thought you guys could help explain this to me.