OK, let's get the hay off the union crap. Unions don't have anything at all to do with the manufacture of a product unless there is a health or safety concern in the manufacturing process. Unions no longer represent the worker, they represent their own self serving organizations, the union.
Not that I care, but you cannot blame a union for the manufacturing steps, quality control measures or cost containment measures taken in a manufacturing process. unions don't give a squat if it is injection molded, cast or milled from bar-stock, they will continue to get their 5 cent dues from each of their members. The company name, whatever it is, is dependent upon the quality of the product. unions never gave a squat about quality as thier name is not linked to it - anyone ever heard of the UAW sedan or station wagon - nope, doesn't exist. unions care only about the power base they can gather from projected membership and what that would enable them in the negotiating field. when a firm goes down the union blames poor management, not the costs it has saddled on the manufacturer.
I spent 33 years in mandated union shop and I spit every time I hear the word. unions have outlived their usefullness; they never have and never will guarantee quality in product manufacturing - they have neither the brains, the power base or the capability. Hasn't anyone ever noticed that the biggest mouths in the unions usually belong to those who couldn't or can't produce or carry their work load. The concept of 'union label' carries as much weight as vapor. Union labor made Levis, which doesn't support the 2nd Amendment. The notion of a union's 'demand' is consistent with wishing in one hand and crapping in the other - you will quickly see which one fills up first and that's where unions have been for the past 40 years.
Here's a lesson in economics - if you can squeeze only so much for a car out of a prospective buyer, and you cannot meet your profit requirements for continuation due to labor demands, and you start turning out crap that people won't buy or drive and you go under and become government funded, the buyer will buy a Toyota and the government winds up supporting the union (notice it is the organization, not the individual member) not the manufacturer. After all, in this country today, the manufacturer is business and republican; this government supports the union (democrats) over business.
I'm tired of hearing all the glowing accolades about unions because it is nothing but hot air. We own the Phillipines. We reclaimed them as a Territory at the end of WWII. I believe the cost of living there is pretty low, which means that produce and manufacturing costs are lower yet that does not translate to quality. I think I would rather do business in one of our Territories than either new york city, chicago or LA, and certainly not in new orleans.........
I don't care who is union and who is not - keep it the hay out of the discussions.