MONTANA SAYS MAKE DEVIATE BEHAVIOUR ILLEGAL.

[powderman]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gays_in_montana


Some there say that homosexuality should be a crime. Wow, bet the aclu is burning rubber to get there. POWDERMAN. 

[dukkillr]

Link doesn't work, and the Supreme Court has ruled on the topic you appear to be addressing. 

[powderman]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gays_in_montana



Try this. POWDERMAN. Still doesn't work, they pulled it pretty fast.

[dukkillr]

Here's the link:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gays_in_montana

[beerbelly]

I still think they should be put to death! They are pedophiles! They do not reproduce, they recruit! Who do they recruit, your kids, an old man like me would just shoot the SOBs.
  This is the lowest form of scum on the earth.
                                       Beerbelly

[powderman]

This is the lowest form of scum on the earth.
                                       Beerbelly


BEERBELLY. Pretty well but I believe the baby butchers have them beat. POWDERMAN. 

[Pat/Rick]

Pretty much a tie on my score board. pedophiles/baby butchers, both are puke.

[magooch]

Can we add, being a liberal, to the list?

[powderman]

Can we add, being a liberal, to the list?

Absolutely. Without libs there would be no problems with gays or baby butcher shops. POWDERMAN. 

[BBF]

I still think they should be put to death! ...............

Weren't we there some time ago!?

[yellowtail3]

'beerbelly' regarding homosexuals:

I still think they should be put to death!    Beerbelly

You gonna do the killing, Beerbelly? Do you want to shoot them in the head, or what?

I still think they should be put to death!      Beerbelly

How about breaking them on the wheel - would that be a better choice? Maybe... crucify them? You want to set an example, I'm guessing, to discourage others from having homosexual desires?

I still think they should be put to death!
                                       Beerbelly

I think the Taliban might welcome you into their membership - they feel the same way you do.

I still think they should be put to death!
                                       Beerbelly

I wonder what Jesus might say to you fervent wish?

[Dee]

'beerbelly' regarding homosexuals:

I think they should be put to death!
                                       Beerbelly

I wonder what Jesus might say to you fervent wish?

Well there is certainly no sense in wondering yellowtail. Here it is in writing what God, the Father, and God the Son both say about queers. I will say however, that beerbelly was not mentioned in this particular part of the punishment phase. But then again, you weren't mentioned as the defense attorney at the Judgement Seat of Christ defending queers either. So I guess it' a wash. But now you know what Christ SAID, and thinks about the unrepentant queer.

Old Testament on queers.
Leviticus Chapter 20 verse 13. And if a man lie with mankind (another man), as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them (themselves).

New Testament on queers.
Romans Chapter 1 verses 26 & 27. Verse 26. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is AGAINST NATURE. Verse 27. AND LIKEWISE ALSO THE MEN, LEAVING THE NATURAL USE OF THE WOMAN, BURNED IN THEIR LUST ONE TOWARD ANOTHER, MEN WITH MEN WORKING THAT WHICH IS UNSEEMLY, AND RECEIVING THAT WHICH IS UNSEEMLY, AND RECEIVING IN THEMSELVES THAT RECOMPENCE OF THEIR ERROR WHICH WAS MEET.

[yellowtail3]

Well there is certainly no sense in wondering yellowtail. Here it is in writing what God, the Father, and God the Son both say about queers. I will say however, that beerbelly was not mentioned in this particular part of the punishment phase. But then again, you weren't mentioned as the defense attorney at the Judgement Seat of Christ defending queers either. So I guess it' a wash. But now you know what Christ SAID, and thinks about the unrepentant queer.

Surely you can do better, Dee, and answer what I actually asked - show what Jesus actually said, on the subject of - as BeerBelly has suggest - putting to death folks who are homosexuals. I am thinking about the subject of judging, which Jesus did/does address, and what judging puts one in danger of. Care to comment on it?

Wishing death upon someone - because they're a homosexual? - is unChristian and downright shameful. Dangerous, too - those some might wish death upon might carry, and so might their friends.

being a 2nd Amendment type, these folks are my friends:
http://www.pinkpistols.org/index2.html

Just curious, Dee - and of course you don't have to answer - do you we think we should be killing homosexuals? Should Christians join in the killing, for those who'd answer yes?

(I'm probably gonna get banned for asking things like this)

[BBF]

They could be "fixed"

[Dee]

Well there is certainly no sense in wondering yellowtail. Here it is in writing what God, the Father, and God the Son both say about queers. I will say however, that beerbelly was not mentioned in this particular part of the punishment phase. But then again, you weren't mentioned as the defense attorney at the Judgement Seat of Christ defending queers either. So I guess it' a wash. But now you know what Christ SAID, and thinks about the unrepentant queer.

Surely you can do better, Dee, and answer what I actually asked - show what Jesus actually said, on the subject of - as BeerBelly has suggest - putting to death folks who are homosexuals. I am thinking about the subject of judging, which Jesus did/does address, and what judging puts one in danger of. Care to comment on it?

Wishing death upon someone - because they're a homosexual? - is unChristian and downright shameful. Dangerous, too - those some might wish death upon might carry, and so might their friends.

being a 2nd Amendment type, these folks are my friends:
http://www.pinkpistols.org/index2.html

Just curious, Dee - and of course you don't have to answer - do you we think we should be killing homosexuals? Should Christians join in the killing, for those who'd answer yes?

(I'm probably gonna get banned for asking things like this)

I don't have to do better, I gave it to you straight from the Master. Accept it or not. As far as killing queers, I believe I DID ADDRESS THAT. In your rush to debate the liberal, view you simply missed it. Re-read my post. The answer to your question is banner like and hard to miss for the discerning Christian. If you are not Christian then say so, as I will then understand why you missed it, and I will pin point it for you in the post.

[yellowtail3]

I don't have to do better, I gave it to you straight from the Master. Accept it or not. As far as killing queers, I believe I DID ADDRESS THAT. In your rush to debate the liberal, view you simply missed it. Re-read my post. The answer to your question is banner like and hard to miss for the discerning Christian. If you are not Christian then say so, as I will then understand why you missed it, and I will pin point it for you in the post.

no need for that, Dee. I'm slow sometimes, and I missed it - where did you quote Jesus on the subject of (us) killing homosexuals? I got where you quoted Romans (Paul), but I missed what Jesus had to say about the subject... be patient with me, and fill me in.

[powderman]

yt3. Are you a member of the pink pistols??? That would explain a lot.
DEE. yt3 is baiting again, his daddy tm would be proud of him. POWDERMAN. 

[Dee]

Romans is New Testament Law under the New Dispensation of Salvation thru Faith and Grace thru the Blood of Christ on the Cross. Homosexuality is an Abomination to Christ, and the unrepentant queer is sentenced to death everlasting. Man is already condemned at birth unless he confesses his sin and accepts Christ. The unrepentant queer cannot have it both ways, and will be judged at the Bema Seat of Christ and sentenced to the SECOND DEATH, unless Christ comes before his death. Then it will be his first and last death but, there will be no pardon. All scripture is given by God, i.e. Christ.
Now. This isn't a Bible study, and you wondered what Jesus would say, and I told you. End of lesson.

[Dee]

yt3. Are you a member of the pink pistols??? That would explain a lot.
DEE. yt3 is baiting again, his daddy tm would be proud of him. POWDERMAN. 

When was the last time you saw someone "successfully" bait me concerning the Scriptures?

[yellowtail3]

yt3. Are you a member of the pink pistols??? That would explain a lot.

Nope, don't know anyone in the organization, and I'm not a member - but I do share a commone interest with them (you probably do, too). But you tell me, PowderPuff - just what would me being a member explain?

Now. This isn't a Bible study, and you wondered what Jesus would say, and I told you. End of lesson.

No, Dee, it's a case of you dodging the obvious - Jesus didn't address whether we should be killing homosexuals, as BeerBelly would like to see done. In fact... Jesus didn't address homosexuality at all. You have pointedly not answered what I specifically asked, which was what did Jesus say on the subject. What you've done, brother, is wussed out with that, "it's in the Bible somewhere, therefore Jesus said it..." dodge, which is a weak non-answer to a specific question.  

Last try: get out your red-letter edition of whatever version you prefer - I'm an NIV guy, myself, but most any translation will do - and find it. I'll wait.... taking a deeeeeeeeeeeeep breath.

No baiting going on, here. Now SOME might take what I've written, and mis-characterize it is, "you're supporting homosexuality! you're a liberal! You're a MUZZIE!!!" or somesuch. That's a great way to shut down a discussion, but not a bit informative... you wouldn't be the type to do that, would you?

[powderman]

"you're supporting homosexuality! you're a liberal! You're a MUZZIE!!!" or somesuch.


If the shoe fits, thats the way you come accross, and YOU  brought up the pink pistols, not I. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, what can I say?? POWDERMAN. 

[Dee]

yt3. Are you a member of the pink pistols??? That would explain a lot.

Nope, don't know anyone in the organization, and I'm not a member - but I do share a commone interest with them (you probably do, too). But you tell me, PowderPuff - just what would me being a member explain?

Now. This isn't a Bible study, and you wondered what Jesus would say, and I told you. End of lesson.

No, Dee, it's a case of you dodging the obvious - Jesus didn't address whether we should be killing homosexuals, as BeerBelly would like to see done. In fact... Jesus didn't address homosexuality at all. You have pointedly not answered what I specifically asked, which was what did Jesus say on the subject. What you've done, brother, is wussed out with that, "it's in the Bible somewhere, therefore Jesus said it..." dodge, which is a weak non-answer to a specific question.  

Last try: get out your red-letter edition of whatever version you prefer - I'm an NIV guy, myself, but most any translation will do - and find it. I'll wait.... taking a deeeeeeeeeeeeep breath.

No baiting going on, here. Now SOME might take what I've written, and mis-characterize it is, "you're supporting homosexuality! you're a liberal! You're a MUZZIE!!!" or somesuch. That's a great way to shut down a discussion, but not a bit informative... you wouldn't be the type to do that, would you?

yellowtail, you are absolutely oblivious as to what I actually said regarding queers. At no time did I say anything what so ever about anyone killing queers, nor did I even elude to it being proper,or improper. What I did say was that God, i.e. Christ condemned the unrepentant queer to death with their own blood, being on their own hands. You have merely to read the Book of Romans and it is as clear as a Church bell. That you are an NIV guy comes as somewhat of a surprise, but actually understanding it is another thing entirely, which you apparently do not. I have given you the scriptures and you need to research them to find out what they mean, as you obviously do not know.
Now. The deep breath that needs to be taken I will give to you, and perhaps the added boost of oxygen will kick in some much needed brain matter. I have made no assumptions of your leaning, nor do I care. Your life, and you opinions, when in contrast to my Faith are meaningless to me. Your an ant on a very busy sidewalk. You are taking yourself much too seriously. Now. I will say this for the last time. This is not a Bible Study, and your are not qualified to discuss it intelligently if it were. Your a beginner at best, and anyone here that knows me will tell you, that I do not debate scripture. If you do not understand it, it is a lack of spiritual discernment. That cannot be taught, it is aquired thru effort, study, and God's Grace.

[beerbelly]

YT I don't believe in god, anyone's god. So I could care less what some mid-east dude says about it. I guess even the Taliban got one thing right! All you have to do is watch their sick behavior and see what needs done with them.
                            Beerbelly

[yellowtail3]

YT I don't believe in god, anyone's god. So I could care less what some mid-east dude says about it. I guess even the Taliban got one thing right! All you have to do is watch their sick behavior and see what needs done with them.                            Beerbelly

Well, BeerBelly, I won't hold it against you - but even if you are for killing homosexuals, the Taliban will reject your membership application based on your unbelief.

[yellowtail3]

yellowtail, you are absolutely oblivious as to what I actually said regarding queers. At no time did I say anything what so ever about anyone killing queers, nor did I even elude to it being proper,or improper.

Never said you did, Dee...

What I did say was that God, i.e. Christ condemned the unrepentant queer to death with their own blood, being on their own hands.

Same as for the unrepentant liar, philanderer, tax cheat, and glutton - right?

You have merely to read the Book of Romans and it is as clear as a Church bell.

You'll have to get it from Paul in Romans, because you sure ain't gonna get it from the words of Jesus. That's why you quoted Paul, dodging the fact that Paul was not Jesus. I understand it's hard to man up and admit it when the facts don't support the position you've taken.

That you are an NIV guy comes as somewhat of a surprise, but actually understanding it is another thing entirely, which you apparently do not.

Why a surprise? I used to like the NAS, but I think it's kind of stiff reading; I only liked it 'cause it was highly regarded by the fundamentalists that I hung out with.  And I do understand some things - for example, that you're unwilling to admit what any honest & knowledgeable reader of the bible knows: that Jesus doesn't say anything in the NT about homosexuals, specifically. Nothing,Nada, Zip.

I have made no assumptions of your leaning, nor do I care.

I've leaned pretty hard right, but with some counter-flooding, I'm approaching an even keel (which some simplistic souls mistake for leaning left).

Now. I will say this for the last time. This is not a Bible Study, and your are not qualified to discuss it intelligently if it were. Your a beginner at best, and anyone here that knows me will tell you, that I do not debate scripture.

Keep studying, young man, and you may yet gain some humility.

[billy_56081]

Old yellow is a member of the pink pistols? Thats why he knows about being the middle man. 

[guzzijohn]

I'll just say again another fine example of republicans speaking out of both sides of their mouths. Republicans are suppose to be for individual rights and lack of government interference yet they are ready to stomp all over individual rights in this case. It is always whatever fits their ideals to whether or not the government should interfere.
Sounds like Beerbelly is card carrying Westboro Church member or at least a wana be. Most who are that homophobe are covering up their own homosexual feelings but have not a clue how to deal with it.
GuzziJohn

[beerbelly]

That is plain BS and you know it. It is a trick used by queers to try to stop people from telling the truth about them!
                                     Beerbelly

[yellowtail3]

Sounds like Beerbelly is card carrying Westboro Church member or at least a wana be. Most who are that homophobe are covering up their own homosexual feelings but have not a clue how to deal with it.
GuzziJohn

Oh, I doubt that BeerBelly is a member. While the Westboro bunch are offensive, nasty, and not very thoughtful - and might welcome BeerBelly on that basis? - they'll object to his atheism, and they're not a very inclusive bunch, from what I can tell... .

[powderman]

Republicans are suppose to be for individual rights and lack of government interference yet they are ready to stomp all over individual rights in this case.



Guzzijohn. What individual rights are you talking about??? The right to deviate  behaviour??? The right to assault children? The right to be taught in schools as acceptable? The right to be in your face about their abominable behaviour? THey are abominations in Gods eyes, or don't the Mennonites teach that??? God gave us all free will, they choose Heaven or hell, pretty simple. If they want to go to hell, their business. Everything they do violates Gods laws, why should mans laws be different??? POWDERMAN.