Author Topic: MAN FATHERS 23 CHILDREN WITH 14 WOMEN. (Read 1034 times)

powderman · « **on:** September 25, 2010, 03:20:31 PM »

Quote

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2010/09/man_who_fathered_23_children_w.html

This deadbeat dad was finally taken out of circulation by going to jail for being $533,000 behind in child support. He can't even remember most of their names. POWDERMAN.

gypsyman · « **Reply #1 on:** September 25, 2010, 03:39:12 PM »

castrat him. If he wants to act like an animal, treat him like one. After the kahona's are cut off, let him out of jail, as all he's doing there is costing the tax payers of Michigan more money. gypsyman

hillbill · « **Reply #2 on:** September 25, 2010, 03:48:57 PM »

i dont place all the blame on him, tho most of it. what about the women who were continually being reimpregnated by him knowing he was a dedbeat?he should be treated as a sex offender in my opinion. what do yuall think?

powderman · « **Reply #3 on:** September 25, 2010, 03:52:24 PM »

Just 2 or 3 years ago a guy in Lou KY a man was convicted of not paying support for 20+ kids with I forgot how many women. He gets a disability check every month and had no intentions of supporting any of them. The judge called him despicable and ORDERED him not to have sex. Well gues who came to his rescue??? YEP, the good old A nti C hristian L iars U nion. They fought and won saying that this piece of dirt had the right to procreate with as many women as he wanted to without paying support. All the mothers were on WELFARE. YEP, good ol aclu. POWDERMAN.

BBF · « **Reply #4 on:** September 26, 2010, 06:45:20 AM »

Tongue in cheek :
If/when the muzzies have a bigger say in this, they would fix him alright and the trash females that spread..........for him.

myronman3 · « **Reply #5 on:** September 26, 2010, 07:02:59 AM »

Quote from: scatterbrain on September 26, 2010, 06:45:20 AM

Tongue in cheek :
If/when the muzzies have a bigger say in this, they would fix him alright and the trash females that spread..........for him.

that is not far from the truth. the irony in the left supporting and giving ground to the extreme muslims is that the FIRST people that will be targeted is the people on the left; as their causes and positions will put them at the top of the hit list. that is funny.

Pat/Rick · « **Reply #6 on:** September 26, 2010, 09:19:07 AM »

Quote from: myronman3 on September 26, 2010, 07:02:59 AM

Quote from: scatterbrain on September 26, 2010, 06:45:20 AM
Tongue in cheek :
If/when the muzzies have a bigger say in this, they would fix him alright and the trash females that spread..........for him.
that is not far from the truth. the irony in the left supporting and giving ground to the extreme muslims is that the FIRST people that will be targeted is the people on the left; as their causes and positions will put them at the top of the hit list. that is funny.

A fine line between irony and justice in some worlds.

Sourdough · « **Reply #7 on:** September 27, 2010, 08:25:36 AM »

Hay, he"s just mentoring his homies down on the street corner. And just think, his boys can all emmulate their father and the girls can follow in their Mama's foorsteps. All contributing to Global Overpopulation.

My home boys say surgically remove the offensive cause.

As for the women, they knew better, but did it anyway. They are hopeless. I better stop here before I tell my real feelings and get myself in trouble.

BBF · « **Reply #8 on:** September 27, 2010, 06:28:19 PM »

On second thought, I blame the females more, they know if they are on birthcontrol and can tell if he wears a "raincoat".
So there you have it.

PS
Never forget those kids are an Income source.

Conan The Librarian · « **Reply #9 on:** September 27, 2010, 06:39:42 PM »

Seems more like a goal tan a limitation.

powderman · « **Reply #10 on:** September 28, 2010, 04:09:42 AM »

Way too many career welfare mothers out there. The pantywetters have all kinds of FREEBIE programs set up to make these unwed mothers feel at ease that having all these babies is just a normal thing to do. The kids are raised fatherless with one daddy after another jumping in and out out of mommas bed, then comes another lil brother or sister, just normal everyday stuff. YEP, sin pays very well. POWDERMAN.

wreckhog · « **Reply #11 on:** September 28, 2010, 06:03:56 AM »

Never understood the welfare mother thing. Is it actually fun to be pregnant? Not according to my wife.

beerbelly · « **Reply #12 on:** September 28, 2010, 06:29:12 AM »

Any unwed mother showing up at a hospital to have a baby, should have to have her tubes tied when the child is borne. This is a reversible procedure. If she gets her act together and can afford more children then it could be reversed.
She should have an option to do this or not. But if she chooses not to then she should not receive one dime in welfare of any kind!
Beerbelly

BBF · « **Reply #13 on:** September 28, 2010, 07:02:48 AM »

or give it up for adoption, that surgery thing costs the taxpayer again

powderman · « **Reply #14 on:** September 28, 2010, 07:21:26 AM »

scatterbrain. I, uhhhh, hmmmm, errrrr, nevermind, you have me on iggy. POWDERMAN.

beerbelly · « **Reply #15 on:** September 28, 2010, 01:11:39 PM »

or give it up for adoption, that surgery thing costs the taxpayer again

But it only costs us once, not twenty-five times!
Beerbelly

powderman · « **Reply #16 on:** September 28, 2010, 04:10:12 PM »

Quote from: beerbelly on September 28, 2010, 01:11:39 PM

or give it up for adoption, that surgery thing costs the taxpayer again

But it only costs us once, not twenty-five times!
Beerbelly

TRUE. POWDERMAN.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #17 on:** September 28, 2010, 05:49:40 PM »

With his potency his cell mate better be careful.

BBF · « **Reply #18 on:** September 28, 2010, 08:17:05 PM »

with the adoption route there will be no child welfare payment and that takes the Income equation out.

BTW powderman I read some of your posts depending on the subject, I need a break from others once in a while.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #19 on:** September 29, 2010, 03:48:41 AM »

Quote from: scatterbrain on September 28, 2010, 08:17:05 PM

with the adoption route there will be no child welfare payment and that takes the Income equation out.

BTW powderman I read some of your posts depending on the subject, I need a break from others once in a while.

BBF, I am very sure that at one point Matt had said he was going to ban anyone who commented on folks they had on ignore.

powderman · « **Reply #20 on:** September 29, 2010, 02:42:03 PM »

Quote

BTW powderman I read some of your posts depending on the subject, I need a break from others once in a while.

HEH. Now I'm back on iggy. POWDERMAN.

hummer58 · « **Reply #21 on:** September 30, 2010, 09:27:02 AM »

Quote from: beerbelly on September 28, 2010, 01:11:39 PM

or give it up for adoption, that surgery thing costs the taxpayer again

But it only costs us once, not twenty-five times!
Beerbelly

Who's to say that the child will be from good seed and will be wanted? As many babies that we have here in the states why do the hollywood moguls always go the foreign countries to adopt? Why? because they know the odds of them getting "crack" babies if adopting here is very likely and they don't want the side effects.
Of course technically most of us are "crack" born babies.

Dixie Dude · « **Reply #22 on:** September 30, 2010, 10:55:51 AM »

They can put clips on her tubes (that are removable) when she is in to have the baby. Not much more cost there. I think all women who are on the government dole should have clips installed until, like they said, she can support her own kids without my tax money. Taxpayers supporting one is enough.

buffermop · « **Reply #23 on:** September 30, 2010, 11:33:27 AM »

BANG!!!

powderman · « **Reply #24 on:** September 30, 2010, 01:21:23 PM »

Hummer. My understanding is that the red tape in America is why folks go overseas, rules may need to be changed. I've heard that here adoptions can take years, no excuse for that. POWDERMAN.

wreckhog · « **Reply #25 on:** September 30, 2010, 02:29:47 PM »

It is a business overseas. You pay and you get. Here, it is more of a scam. I know folks that have contracted with a preggo, and been left with no money and no baby.

slim rem 7 · « **Reply #26 on:** September 30, 2010, 02:52:48 PM »

i was no angel before i got married.. but being the daddy of 5 ..i just never understood these fellas that
produce children that need a dad..this with them having no intention of being that dad..
its just too easy to prevent..jmo.. i hate to judge folk ..but that is just totally irresponceible..again jmo

BBF · « **Reply #27 on:** October 01, 2010, 07:57:23 AM »

Quote from: hummer58 on September 30, 2010, 09:27:02 AM

............................. As many babies that we have here in the states why do the hollywood moguls always go the foreign countries to adopt? ................

Mostly for publicity .

even better if the child is of a visible minority.

Dixie Dude · « **Reply #28 on:** October 01, 2010, 09:23:49 AM »

I read somewhere that most minorities have and keep their children. Most abortions are on white middle and upper class teen and young adult girls. Most who want to adopt are white middle and upper class people who can afford, so they can't find a white baby to adopt, so they adopt mostly Korean or Eastern European babies.