I am a very religious person , My Christian beliefs are personal, I push then on no one, and I want no one pushing theirs on me. I must agree with MgMorden on this.
You cannot favor one over all.
If you make laws for one , then you would need to make laws for all.
I also believe let people worship how they well please - just keep the government out of the affairs. Just as our founding fathers believed. Freedom to worship how you choose.
Separation from church and state is important. If you allow the christian flag to fly , you must also allow a Zion Flag , a Buddhist flag , A united Methodist flag, a Tibetan Buddhist prayer flag , a Presbyterian flag etc...
The only way for equality is allow all or allow none.
Once again - how does flying "a christian flag" in any way shape or form "establish" a State religion? Does it force you to attend a certain sects services? Are special fees imposed on you or special taxes levied on you if you don't attend services of a certain sect? Please, answer that question, don't side step it with the usual platitudes and diversions.
Be nice if you also answered these too:
And, how come a city setting up Dolhareubang in a public park doesn't establish a religion?
How are junior colleges and Dept. of Parks & Rec offering Qi Gong, Feng Shui, and Yoga - all of which have religious roots, and qi gong and feng shui are actively shamanist religions now - not establishing a religion?
How are buddhist prayer flags being allowed on public land not establishing a religion?
How is public money spent on taiko drummers for various celebrations not establishing a religion? (and,yes, taiko has mystic/shamanist roots)
Somehow it seems like the professional victims think that ONLY Christians are capable of establishing a state religion.
As you say, the only way for equality is to allow none. But somehow it is ONLY Christianity, which is followed in some form by about 85% of Americans, that is being driven from public view.
(sits back and waits for more straw men, red herrings, and other diversions)