Author Topic: Thank you Sarah ! (Read 2604 times)

ironglow · « **on:** October 31, 2010, 09:48:27 AM »

Thanks Sarah;
You have the courage to call the sleazy, corrupt so-called "journalists" and "reporters" exactly what they are. Even an 'opinion' journalist would be hitting a sleazy low if they started hatching up smear plots against candidates...even an oposing politician would be considered a dirtbag if he/she were to make up crap like these "journalists" were caught doing. Although many politicians are now engaged in similar mud-sucking, a 'journalist' should be a bit above such drivel...
THANKS; FOR SPEAKING FOR MOST OF US SARAH !

http://www.breitbart.tv/palin-on-alaska-reporters-corrupt-bastards/

ironglow · « **Reply #1 on:** October 31, 2010, 09:56:44 AM »

Here's the proof of the CBS muck-raking; http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=221973

If I were an Alaskan, I would vote for Joe simply to chastise the corrupt b _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s..

Of course, then i couldn't vote for Lisa Murgulski..

Dee · « **Reply #2 on:** October 31, 2010, 10:10:21 AM »

Possibly the only problem I have with Palin, is HER seemingly double standard when she talks about RINOs, as she mentioned on THIS TAPE. What about her STRONG SUPPORT of the Liberal RINO John McCain. What's up with that?

DDZ · « **Reply #3 on:** October 31, 2010, 03:02:54 PM »

"Those are corrupt b------s!" Finally someone has called the liberal media what they are.

Sourdough · « **Reply #4 on:** November 01, 2010, 03:32:38 AM »

The media waited till the day before the election to throw smear tactics against Ted Stevens, and got us saddled with Mark Begich. Now they are wanting to cause us to be stuck again with Liza who votes more along the democratic lines than some Dems.

In the local elections they have come out with some down right lies the day before the election and caused the conservative candidate to lose by just a few votes. Votes so close had to go into recount and was only by like five votes differance.

Go Sarah! Don't forget she is responsiable for sending members of the "Corrupt Bxxxxxxs Club" to prison.

wreckhog · « **Reply #5 on:** November 01, 2010, 12:25:17 PM »

Just like a woman (or a Rep) to whine about how unfair the world is.

Sourdough · « **Reply #6 on:** November 02, 2010, 03:50:31 AM »

Wreck: The whiners are guys like Vic Korring, sitting in Federal Prison thanks to Sarah Palin. We hear monthly how ole Vic is needing to get out of prison for one reason or another. I say let him whine about that woman, and how unfair she is, as he rots in prison. Ole Vic was a member of the Corrupt BXXXXXXs Club. Taking money from Lobbiest, (Trips to Hawaii, the Carribean, and even to Europe) then voting as the Lobbiest requested.

Dixie Dude · « **Reply #7 on:** November 02, 2010, 03:56:59 AM »

I think Sarah Palin only supported McCain because he is the one who brought her into the mainstream. She was unknown until being nominated for VP. Her actions, her politics, don't really line up with McCain.

Sourdough · « **Reply #8 on:** November 02, 2010, 06:44:31 AM »

Sarah respects McCain for his war record, as we all do. I feel she also does not want to say anything negative about McCain since he is the one that rocketed her onto the National stage. But she does not agree with McCains views, he is too moderate for her.

myronman3 · « **Reply #9 on:** November 02, 2010, 07:04:26 AM »

Quote from: Dee on October 31, 2010, 10:10:21 AM

Possibly the only problem I have with Palin, is HER seemingly double standard when she talks about RINOs, as she mentioned on THIS TAPE. What about her STRONG SUPPORT of the Liberal RINO John McCain. What's up with that?

+1

ironglow · « **Reply #10 on:** November 02, 2010, 08:23:49 AM »

Quote from: wreckhog on November 01, 2010, 12:25:17 PM

Just like a woman (or a Rep) to whine about how unfair the world is.

Of course we all know...liberals never whine....

saddlebum · « **Reply #11 on:** November 02, 2010, 11:38:37 PM »

I watched Sarah make those statements on FNC. I don't mean this in a sexist way but, she is cute as a bug when she gets her blood up about something. Momma Grizzly....Grrrrr... I think she is getting her stride back after being hammered by the left. I was reminded of her RNC speech she gave when McRino introduced her as VP candidate. Feisty! She's not letting the garbage from the left bother her so much anymore. Not to mention that she is getting richer by the day and gaining more political power and popularity......Drives the left crazy. I love it!!

Oh, btw, Those jerks from the TV station got fired.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/alaska-tv-station-fires-staff-for-phonegate-plot-against-joe-miller/
Local CBS affiliate KTVA announced Tuesday afternoon via press release (.doc) that two producers are no longer with the station as a result of an accidental voice recording which captured newsroom staff discussing coverage plans for Joe Miller rally last Thursday.

Who's whining now?

gypsyman · « **Reply #12 on:** November 03, 2010, 03:00:28 AM »

Dee/M3, did you ever think she was trying to be kind to McCain. After all, if your wife came out of the bedroom with a new outfit on, and she asked, does this make my butt look big, would you tell her ''yep, looks like the backend of a $2 cow'', or would you be a good,and smart husband,like me, and say, ''Oh no honey, looks just fine!) And then ask for Gods forgiveness for lying! Maybe she's just trying to be nice to her elders.

gypsyman

saddlebum · « **Reply #13 on:** November 03, 2010, 03:16:25 AM »

No name calling, please.

That's okay! The one that gets away with saying what ever he wants got the message!
Disparaging someones reputation with lies and false accusations needs to be addressed, sternly.
I may not have handled it in a politically correct manner and my candor was tarnished, but I am a plain spoken man.
If the bomb throwers are offended by the responses they get then maybe they should think before they speak also.
When comments are made purely to inflame an otherwise civil conversation, then expect the conversation to deteriorate from there.
I did not invent the word Troll. I learned what that was on this website.

Sorry for the trouble. Maybe I will be number 12 on his ignore list!

ironglow · « **Reply #14 on:** November 03, 2010, 05:05:49 AM »

  Most outdoorsmen I know think Sarah is a pretty special lady. There are a couple who try to condemn her but when pressed for specifics, cannot furnish any. She doesn't need to be prez since she's doing an effective job right where she's at.
   So why did she back John McCain ? ...Because she is a smart, capable and perceptive woman..that's why..
  Let's look back to 2008..by the time Sarah came in to back McCain, it was a 2 man race to take the helm at the White House. It was either going to be John McCain.. or Barack Hussein Obama.. Likely she tried to help McCain win just to save the country from a Marxist takeover. That is smarter than a good share of the American voters were at the time. When the only choice to occupy our "People's House", is between a kindly old hound dog and a deadly King Cobra..most of us would choose an old hound dog every time..
  McCain was far from perfect, but compared to what we have had for two years..he's a remarkable man..and a heroic veteran to boot !
  Sarah tried to save us from Obamacare, Nationalized auto companies, a bloated, insatiablly taxing government, a $786,000,000,000 stimulus that didn't stimulate and a C-inC who bows and scrapes to every Muslim dictator he can find.
  Last night an announcement was made, headlining a new documentary showing much about Sarah, her lifestyle and how she rides ATV to the hunting area, shoots a moose or bear and field dresses it herself. She also skis, boats among Kodiak bears anhelps pullin nets opn Todd's fishing boat in Bristol Bay and she has birthed and raised 4-5 lovely children. While doing this she managed to be a mayor and later governor of the largest of our 50 states, negotiate international contracts and remain strikingly beautiful at the same time...plus, her earning power is pretty good !
Now, most outdoorsmen I know would sacrifice their eye teeth for a wife like that ! But still , some dislike Sarah, and I pondered the reason, so putting some 74 years of experience to work and after careful consideration, these are my conclusions:

1) With her above qualifications, most outdoorsmen would "give their eye teeth" to have a wife like her, but they don't... Still, they are so jealous of Todd Palin that they strike out at Sarah... Like Aesop's fox who couldn't quite reach the grapes..

....OR
.....OR
2) These detractors have a wife quite unlike Sarah..but this wife they are tied to, is herself so envious of Sarah that she can barely contain her anger... Thus hubby, afraid to contradict wifey, joins in the cat-fight against Sarah !
...Just to keep peace in the home, you know !

saddlebum · « **Reply #15 on:** November 03, 2010, 05:28:27 AM »

ironglow, you have an uncanny and humorous sense of reasoning. But well thought out none the less!

ironglow · « **Reply #16 on:** November 03, 2010, 05:34:44 AM »

Thank you Saddlebum, but it is easy when one is dealing with a remarkable woman like Sarah and those who complain (irrationally) about her.

Dixie Dude · « **Reply #17 on:** November 03, 2010, 05:36:15 AM »

She even said she and McCain had a lot to disagree on, but they were trying to stop the Obama machine. I've heard her a lot on Fox in the last few months. She is getting more polished, and is more comfortable being interviewed. She is also more comfortable just being herself, and saying what she believes instead of towing the party line or McCains line like she did or had to do during their campaign. When her teleprompter stopped in her acceptance speach, she add-libbed about the pit bull with lipstick. So, just being herself is refreshing.

saddlebum · « **Reply #18 on:** November 03, 2010, 05:47:47 AM »

I think if you get anything from her relationship with McRino is that she is more conservative than he is. It showed in their campaign and caused friction with her handlers. They tried to shut her up and it just hurt the campaign and caused hard feelings with those people. After all most of us were voting for Sarah and not John anyway. I thought she handled the back stabbing she got from those jerks alot better than I would have. She rose above it and stayed respectful to McRino eventhough he did nothing to stick up for her. Proved she is a bigger person than he is. IMO

Conan The Librarian · « **Reply #19 on:** November 03, 2010, 06:09:47 AM »

Yes, she does the job that Steele should have been doing for the RNC.

Do you happen to know who pays Sara? The money for all this campaigning had to come from somewhere and it could not have come from her personal campaign funds because she was not running for anything.

saddlebum · « **Reply #20 on:** November 03, 2010, 06:38:49 AM »

She has a PAC. I don't know the particulars on it. She also gets paid well for speaking ingagements. Made over a million on her first book. #2 will be out soon. FNC payday. Wouldn't be surprised if she gets expenses paid for by the campaigns. I don't know!

A nutty progressive guy I know told me that while she was Governer she stole 200 million dollars in earmark money from Alaska. Yep, just stuck it in her pocket. Maybe she is using that.

You know with all the crazy things the progressives say she has done, you would think she would be spending the rest of her life in prison.

gypsyman · « **Reply #21 on:** November 03, 2010, 08:14:37 AM »

They just like throwing mud and hoping that it sticks someplace. What they forget is, it just makes them a bigger fool, and, when or if, they do have a legitimate claim, like the boy that cry's wolf, nobody will listen. gypsyman

Hooker · « **Reply #22 on:** November 03, 2010, 09:04:32 AM »

What ticks these over educated self worshiping libs off about Mrs. Palin is,.
Here we have this down home plain spoken country girl and she gets more attention than they do.

Pat

saddlebum · « **Reply #23 on:** November 03, 2010, 05:40:04 PM »

Quote from: saddlebum on November 03, 2010, 03:16:25 AM

No name calling, please.

That's okay! The one that gets away with saying what ever he wants got the message!
Disparaging someones reputation with lies and false accusations needs to be addressed, sternly.
I may not have handled it in a politically correct manner and my candor was tarnished, but I am a plain spoken man.
If the bomb throwers are offended by the responses they get then maybe they should think before they speak also.
When comments are made purely to inflame an otherwise civil conversation, then expect the conversation to deteriorate from there.
I did not invent the word Troll. I learned what that was on this website.

Sorry for the trouble. Maybe I will be number 12 on his ignore list!

Dee · « **Reply #24 on:** November 06, 2010, 03:18:38 AM »

Quote from: Sourdough on November 02, 2010, 06:44:31 AM

Sarah respects McCain for his war record, as we all do. I feel she also does not want to say anything negative about McCain since he is the one that rocketed her onto the National stage. But she does not agree with McCains views, he is too moderate for her.

If you don't agree with someones politics, then you don't support them, which enables them to further promote their political agenda. If a rapist pulls you out of a burning car, do you help him find his next victim, just because he saved your life? I think your justification for her supporting McCain, knowing what he is, is illogical. She is sending mixed signals, and you guys are also, by trying to justify her actions just because you like her. Not to argue, but McCain is, what he is, and Palin did what she did.
Selective criticizing sticks out like a sore thumb, and her not wanting to say anything negative about McCain is "selective criticism", and "IS" an indicator of a "double standard". If she didn't want to say anything negative about ole RINO John, just don't say anything about him at all. She in fact STUMPED for him, and HELPED HIM GET RE-ELECTED. Now he's "back to business", and Palin HELPED HIM. Justify that.

Sourdough · « **Reply #25 on:** November 06, 2010, 04:17:11 AM »

TM: OK You opened your mouth, what were they going to pin on Sarah that would have ended her carreer? Funny Alaskans do not know about it.

Unlike so many others out of the know, We Alaskans know why she was forced to resign. Alaskans understood it and while we did not like it we backed her all the way, unlike the knownothings in the lower 48 that believe everything the media says.

We were actually hoping she would run for Senate and knock out Lisa. That would have put her in the same position Obama was in when he decided to run, only with a lot more experience.

Dee · « **Reply #26 on:** November 06, 2010, 08:13:56 AM »

Quote from: Sourdough on November 06, 2010, 04:17:11 AM

TM: OK You opened your mouth, what were they going to pin on Sarah that would have ended her carreer? Funny Alaskans do not know about it.

Unlike so many others out of the know, We Alaskans know why she was forced to resign. Alaskans understood it and while we did not like it we backed her all the way, unlike the knownothings in the lower 48 that believe everything the media says.

We were actually hoping she would run for Senate and knock out Lisa. That would have put her in the same position Obama was in when he decided to run, only with a lot more experience.

Well Sourdough, in this we are in total agreement on. I think the call she made, made perfect sense. The goofiness of the lawsuits, and the reasons there of, were obvious, and she indeed could not perform her duties as Governor of Alaska because of it. She did the right thing for the State, and showed me that her heart, concerning Alaska was in the right place. HOWEVER, she hurt herself with many, by not calling out McCain like she has many others, and instead PROPED HIM UP with her voice.

jimster · « **Reply #27 on:** November 06, 2010, 11:55:40 AM »

Quote

Of course we all know...liberals never whine....

You should here them bellyaching in Michigan... lot's of whining here now.

saddlebum · « **Reply #28 on:** November 06, 2010, 12:00:27 PM »

It seems odd to me that my post was removed and yet some of this garbage stays.
Maybe a double standard for moderators?
Makes me wonder which moderator axed my post. Maybe the one I was addressing in my post?............just curious

ironglow · « **Reply #29 on:** November 06, 2010, 01:40:27 PM »

Quote from: saddlebum on November 03, 2010, 05:40:04 PM

Quote from: saddlebum on November 03, 2010, 03:16:25 AM
No name calling, please.

That's okay! The one that gets away with saying what ever he wants got the message!
Disparaging someones reputation with lies and false accusations needs to be addressed, sternly.
I may not have handled it in a politically correct manner and my candor was tarnished, but I am a plain spoken man.
If the bomb throwers are offended by the responses they get then maybe they should think before they speak also.
When comments are made purely to inflame an otherwise civil conversation, then expect the conversation to deteriorate from there.
I did not invent the word Troll. I learned what that was on this website.

Sorry for the trouble. Maybe I will be number 12 on his ignore list!

Saddlebum;
When I saw that you had asked for proof...somehow I knew we would get a boatload of innuendo, rumors, lies and hateful accusations, picked from whatever offbeat, progressive slave website or magazine...the habitual Kool-aid quaffers.

They make up stories and get friends to swear to them, just like the many falsehoods conjured up from about Oct 29 through Nov1, when some politicians got desperate enough. The really crooked and accomplished politicians have learned to hold their lies until the last couple days when it is difficult to refute them.

The public is beginning to catch on that any accusations brought after mid October, are most likely a lie so it didn't work so well this time (e.g. Rand Paul in KY).