My dad is a big-time Ruger fanatic in the same way that Swampman is keen on Remingtons.
I once bought a pair of tang safety Ruger M-77 Ultralights in .250 Savage -one for me, and one that I gave to him from Christmas. Mine wasn't very accurate at all and was actually less accurate than my Marlin 336. His would shoot five shots from a cold barrel into clusters where all the bullet holes touched each other, using a handload topped with 120 gr. Sierra Gamekings. It shot Remington factory 100 grain Core-Lokts very well, too. His barrel, I think, was much better than mine. Mine was prone to serious copper fouling. These two rifles were close in serial number, too. They couldn't have been more different from each other in terms of end results. I remember being pretty disgusted with the performance of the rifle.
The .250 Savage Ultralight was actually my third attempt at trying a tang saftey Ruger M-77. The other two that I had previously were .30-'06's and they weren't particularly accurate, either. I know they can be, because my dad's shot well from the git-go and I have a hunting buddy out in California who has a .25-'06 that is one of the most accurate production centerfire rifles I've ever shot. Another buddy has one in .220 Swift that is very accurate, too -as accurate as the other fellow's .25-'06 but more finicky about diet.
That is part of what made my personal experience with them so dissapointing and frustrating. I was expecting the same kind of performance that friends were getting with their examples. Didn't happen for me, but then, I am probably the only person on the planet to have owned a Remington M-700 and vowed to never go down that road again because it wasn't as accurate as my dowdy little Marlin 336, either.
I think if gnat's testicle accuracy was of paramount importance to me, I'd elsewhere other than a tang safety Ruger M-77, unless I knew the gun I was buying through shooting it or seeing it being shot.
JP