Not so much, I just prefer simple when complicated adds nothing of value.
To date, no one has been able to explain to me what the tips add except looks, and looks add nothing to reliability or field performance. Not saying I would turn down a rifle with a tip, but don't own any and fancy tips are a zero priority. My rifles are hunters, not collector’s items.
Ok so please explain why a collectable rifle cannot be used in the field to hunt with?
Brithunter –
Those are beautiful specimens, no question. Send any of them my way and I promise to take VERY good care of them!
First, a correction – I DO own a rifle with a black tip, just one. And, for those that care (I don’t), it has white line spacers, too!!! It is the 1975 Remington M700 BDL in .308 Win. I bought in like-new condition back in November of 2005. Gander Mountain had it for sale and I picked it up for $350. Probably my prettiest rifle and it shoots like this:
First handloads, development loads, 0.5g powder increments per shot:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c792/8c7928b80446d83cbc9604f0e83770a49700284e" alt=""
Later, with one of those powder charges:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b43a/3b43a293c17de47b7e0cc06c2019e7f43d0613a0" alt=""
And yes, I’ve taken it hunting – so far only for antelope and only in good weather. My bad for forgetting about that one!
In 2008 I bought a brand new Remington M700 “Special Purpose Wood”, manufactured in 2005. It is the third from the left in the photo below. The rifles, from the left, are a Ruger M77 .30-06, Ruger MKII stainless .30-06, Remington M700 .30-06, Ruger “boat paddle” stock, Ruger MKII stainless long action with magnum bolt face:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29903/29903b55812de944b7e6b8156cb5040e22e5192c" alt=""
What the photo doesn’t show is the “character marks” the Remington .30-06 received on its very first hunt. We had climbed the western peak of Bear’s Ears (northwest Colorado between Steamboat Springs and Craig, pretty much due north of Hayden) and were descending the northwest slope. I took two separate spills on the talus. Between them I ended up with scratches in the scope, barrel and action and multiple dings in the wood. The “character marks” didn’t make me very happy but didn’t overly distress me, either. Had it been a “collector’s item” the distress level would have been much higher.
I only own one custom rifle and the “opportunity cost” of purchasing that rifle meant that I got one rifle instead of several. The rifle is an Interarms Mark X action on a Boyd stock with Timney trigger and Kreiger barrel. Krieger trued the action, installed a 6.5-06AI barrel and bedded the action to the stock. I built it for long range play (out to about 1200 yards) and long range hunting (out to about 800 yards).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a41e9/a41e94452463012a27e3fbcdea40c641a7aaa19d" alt=""
Expensive and shoots like a dream, but not really a collectible and nothing really fancy. If I ding the stock it is easily replaced. Scratches in the metal I can live with but something I would prefer to delay as long as possible.
Here are pictures of some of my other rifles.
From bottom up, Browning B92 .44 Mag, Marlin 336CS .30-30, Marlin 375 .375 win, Marlin 1895 .45.70:
Ruger M77 .257 Roberts:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35b0c/35b0cd646efd23a09fd83d09f688c42c80629d4a" alt=""
Ruger MKII’s in .300 Win Mag (top) and stainless .30-06 (bottom) in “boat paddle” stocks. You’ve seen the .30-06 above as it was when I purchased it in the laminate stock:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bd19/1bd19ddd0052efcfe220310dd40afff913db407e" alt=""
The Ruger MKII stainless action on the right in the top rifle photo above is a work in progress. The action is now mounted in the laminate stock taken off the .30-06 and Santa is bringing a scope. The barrel will have to wait until after tax time but it will likely be either a .375 Ruger or a .338-.375 Ruger wildcat. Again, nothing fancy and certainly not a collectible item, although the final price tag will be higher than I like and once again the “opportunity cost” will measured in multiple rifles that I could have purchased for less.
Well over half my centerfire rifles were purchased used and I’m very happy with them. In the factory new rifles, nothing cost over $550. No ugly ducklings and all shoot very well except my Remington M700 in .30-06, which struggles to maintain 1-1/2” groups. They make great hunters but no one is going to pay a premium for them based on their collectability, which rates zip. I appreciate fancy wood, engraving, gold inlay and so on, I’m just not willing to pay for it on a hunter as they inevitably and invariably show the wear one way or another.
At any rate, there is nothing “wrong” with hunting with fancy or collectible rifles. More power to those who choose to do so, I just prefer to put my money into function.