Author Topic: The Auschwitz album. Can't happen here?????? (Read 13410 times)

scootrd · « **Reply #180 on:** January 07, 2011, 08:24:03 AM »

Quote from: TM7 on January 07, 2011, 04:36:16 AM

I'm not expecting much in rebuttal to Untermayer's Declaration of Holy War, or on other hard topics about this era and Holoscriber storyline from you, or even from scootrd.

First , I haven't had time to read all. Second , I need to do some reading . Perhaps unlike others I am open to reading all points of view , then I go off and immerse myself in study of a particular subject and formulate my own opinions on what I have learned reading all points of view. Only then do I believe I have enough information to debate a particular position or speak intelligently about a specific subject matter.

so ...
as far as Untermayer's Declaration of Holy War - I cannot at this time comment intelligently.
I do not know enough knowledge at present on the substance of this declaration, perceived or otherwise.

I will and do however study , place context in constructs of time periods , discuss with others , and form my own opinions and beliefs based on what I learn. and if I feel it warrants rebuttal, Then I will certainly provide one based on an informed decision from knowledge I obtain.

And how is not this the most reprehensible ignorance, to think that one knows what one does not know? But I, O Athenians! in this, perhaps, differ from most men; and if I should say that I am in any thing wiser than another, it would be in this, that not having a competent knowledge of the things in Hades, I also think that I have not such knowledge.

- Socrates

billy_56081 · « **Reply #181 on:** January 07, 2011, 11:23:49 AM »

TM did yall go off the deep end?

powderman · « **Reply #182 on:** January 07, 2011, 11:49:07 AM »

Quote

You want replies..please don't make your posts so lengthy. If you would be a bit more concise, you may get more answers.

IG. Replies are not expected, or wanted. His, or her goal, is to totally confuse folks with non subject related garbage so we will give up trying to figure out what he, or she, is even talking about, thereby stopping a subject that he, or she, does not want discussed. Did anybody actually read all of that stuff?

?? POWDERMAN.

ironglow · « **Reply #183 on:** January 07, 2011, 12:54:11 PM »

Here's a bit of logic...springing from one of the Jihadist cultures.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/international/saudi-arabia-nabbed-israeli-tagged-vulture-for-being-mossad-spy-1.335171

powderman · « **Reply #184 on:** January 07, 2011, 03:57:15 PM »

IRONGLOW. Those Jews are really crafty. Just a month or so ago they sent trained sharks to attack tourists. Boy, they don't miss a trick. I heard that they are teaching pigeons to only poop on rags. POWDERMAN.

ironglow · « **Reply #185 on:** January 08, 2011, 05:12:11 AM »

Quote from: powderman on January 07, 2011, 03:57:15 PM

IRONGLOW. Those Jews are really crafty. Just a month or so ago they sent trained sharks to attack tourists. Boy, they don't miss a trick. I heard that they are teaching pigeons to only poop on rags. POWDERMAN.

Next month they will not only poop there..they will start to wipe there also ! Ye gads the torture chambers will be full of innocent pigeons, which were misused by those "wascally Iswalies" !

Now, it does appear they are smarter than most in their immediate global neighborhood....but I still wonder if they can truly recruit vultures, sharks and now pigeons...as Mossad agents...

ironglow · « **Reply #186 on:** January 08, 2011, 06:08:35 AM »

TM;
  A short reply;
  First you again try to "translate" what I said..we don't need that since I am quite comprehensive in my own words..I'll do my own "translating" thank you.

  1) It is becoming rather obvious you never served in a real military...or you would "get it". I was using Pvt Lozon to show that some folks being way out of step with the rest of the population, still believe they are in step while everyone else is wrong . Think about that for a moment !

  2) I reject that notion.. sinc I almost invariably confront with facts...sorry, just my style.

3) Here again you have a misunderstanding of Christianity..you say" The Scofield Bible has been the standard reference work in virtually all Christian ministries and divinity schools". While I have no major quarrel with Scofield, it would be folly in the extreme to think that the Scofield Bible is standard reference for them. I have been involved in many ministries and attended "divinity" school, and Scofield was rarely even mentioned , say nothing about endorsing his annotated Bible as "the reference".
   I suppose some cults would try to teach such a thing..just to advance their grip on gullibles.

3A) I found it entertaining that you would claim that the Darby-Scofield-Henry ("threatening trio"?) ... All served as "agents for the Zionist" (s)..
since most all reference books say the Zionist movement started in the 19th century, some say 'late' 19th century, I am surprised that you would consider Matthew Henry as a co-conspirator with the Zionists...since Matthew Henry lived circa 1662 to 1714.

ironglow · « **Reply #187 on:** January 08, 2011, 11:58:02 AM »

Transcipher vs translate ...nice dodge...you still didn't answer the charge..

1) I'm sure you're "not concerned with all that stuff"... nice dodge again ! You never served in the military but still want to judge things only a military experienced person would know about. !

2) You accused me of trying to slay the messenger..check this thread no name calling... much facts presented. On the contrary, you in your #3 point accuse me of taking some kind of drug called Holozak..don't recognize it or any other illicit drug.. must be something in your own stash.

3) I never was very concerned with Scofield, until you started trying to smear him. I figured then by what you said that there is something you're leaving out, so I did a bit of research. Seems you neglected to mention an important point on Scofields life timeline..
Yes, he was apparently jailed at one time and even left his family at one point. He was a member of the Kansas legislaturte in 1871 &1872. All these events were long before he was saved in 1879.
Either you do not understand genuine Christianity, or you intentionally omitted the important date of his conversion (1879).. which is it ?

BBF · « **Reply #188 on:** January 09, 2011, 06:23:02 AM »

Quote from: ironglow on January 07, 2011, 04:14:36 AM

Quote from: scootrd on January 06, 2011, 06:49:39 PM
Went through my Basic Training on Tank Hill

we would don full field pack, rifle, canteen and horseshoe roll... and altogether start running up and down that hill. It was a way of maintaining discipline and promoting respect.

The "Unwashed" in the Wehrmacht had a particular name for NCO's like that.

BBF · « **Reply #189 on:** January 09, 2011, 06:48:30 AM »

TM7

I've read most of the posts on this very lenghty subject here. Due to very personal and ethnic reasons I won't jump into this discussion but thank you for having the "cajones" to post this. A fair number of things read very familiar from conversations with my late father.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #190 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:12:37 AM »

I agree scatterbrain it is good to see this kind of antisemetic hatred out in the open. It lets you know this kind of hatred did not die with Hitler and the Third Riech. Lets the decent people in the world know thye have to watch folks like this.

powderman · « **Reply #191 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:54:55 AM »

Quote from: billy_56081 on January 09, 2011, 11:12:37 AM

I agree scatterbrain it is good to see this kind of antisemetic hatred out in the open. It lets you know this kind of hatred did not die with Hitler and the Third Riech. Lets the decent people in the world know they have to watch folks like this.

BILLY. YEP, a daily reminder that satan is alive and well. POWDERMAN.

powderman · « **Reply #192 on:** January 09, 2011, 03:22:53 PM »

HEH, keep it up, you are a riot. Our pastor spoke of people like you this morning. POWDERMAN.

ironglow · « **Reply #193 on:** January 09, 2011, 04:01:02 PM »

Quote from: scatterbrain on January 09, 2011, 06:23:02 AM

Quote from: ironglow on January 07, 2011, 04:14:36 AM
Quote from: scootrd on January 06, 2011, 06:49:39 PM
Went through my Basic Training on Tank Hill

we would don full field pack, rifle, canteen and horseshoe roll... and altogether start running up and down that hill. It was a way of maintaining discipline and promoting respect.

The "Unwashed" in the Wehrmacht had a particular name for NCO's like that.

Scatter;
I would like to point out one thing, a point several here apparently missed. Look again at my above statement and let me emphasize

" WE would don full field pack, rifle, canteen and horseshoe roll..ans ALTOGETHER start running up and down that hill. It was a way of maintaining discipline and promoting respect. "

NOTE: I said WE would don full field pack..and altogether with them...we would run.. I never simply DROVE such troops, I always LED them. By doing what they were doing and beating them at it, one gained respect. It also builds Esprit De Corps and confidence in the troops !
Not surprised some were confused, anyone never having tasted the military, especially the combat arms, probably wouldn't understand.

scootrd · « **Reply #194 on:** January 09, 2011, 04:32:59 PM »

IG - I completely agree,
I was a kid that was walking the fence and running with a bad crowd. My father died when I was young and I was truant running the streets by 14. My Uncle finally intervened when I was 17 - and away to the military I went. Best darn thing that ever happened. Learned not to be self centered , to think of team , put others before self, and and it was more important all finished together than one to finish alone.

I had a lot of respect for the DI's . I didn't make it easy for 'em either , I was a hard case with a big chip. Challenged them every step of the way, But in the end I gained much respect for them and the Job they did , day in and day out and have to admit , They made me a better person to this day. And yes they gained my respect because they indeed led by example. They did not ask anything of us they themselves were not prepared to do , or did . Fair but Tough is how I always described our DI's.

They took boys/young men and made soldiers. Those who never served just can't relate.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #195 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:32:13 AM »

Quote from: TM7 on January 09, 2011, 01:35:52 PM

That's why 18 countries have outlawed historical research on this topic...I think unfortunately Canada is one. These holo promoters will eventually suceed at having freedom of speech removed in the USA using this holocaust excuse primarily....that will be a sad day,,,and this may be one of the last discussions you see about this fraud and perps.

..TM7
.

TM I have to agree with yall on this one. I want to keep you haters out in the open so we can see that this Nazi hatred is still out there and keep our eyes on yall.

ironglow · « **Reply #196 on:** January 10, 2011, 03:47:13 AM »

  From TM;
   1) I'm sure you're "not concerned with all that stuff"... nice dodge again ! You never served in the military but still want to judge things only a military experienced person would know about. !No, I'm not really too concerned with that stuff reason or excuse to expalin anything, only as far as the topic in this thread is concerned...you brought it up as a 'wildcard'. You would be surprised about my service or mil grounding...simply not special for me to throw it out. Its your thing and that's fine...but expect a closer looking at if you bring it up.



   Ironglow says;
   So surprise me ! I am a veteran and belong to veteran's organizations and am always interested in sharing past experience with other vets. You know...... Unit, which combat arm, MOS, where stationed etc. Perhaps we served together somewhere..
   ...But please, start out by indicating which nation or force you were serving..

ironglow · « **Reply #197 on:** January 10, 2011, 04:03:03 AM »

Quote from: scootrd on January 09, 2011, 04:32:59 PM

IG - I completely agree,
I was a kid that was walking the fence and running with a bad crowd. My father died when I was young and I was truant running the streets by 14. My Uncle finally intervened when I was 17 - and away to the military I went. Best darn thing that ever happened. Learned not to be self centered , to think of team , put others before self, and and it was more important all finished together than one to finish alone.

I had a lot of respect for the DI's . I didn't make it easy for 'em either , I was a hard case with a big chip. Challenged them every step of the way, But in the end I gained much respect for them and the Job they did , day in and day out and have to admit , They made me a better person to this day. And yes they gained my respect because they indeed led by example. They did not ask anything of us they themselves were not prepared to do , or did . Fair but Tough is how I always described our DI's.

They took boys/young men and made soldiers. Those who never served just can't relate.

Scootrd;
I am pleased it worked for you, it usually does, at least in about 95% of those cases. I am sure it will be no surprise to you..that we DIs rather handpicked the strenuous exercise we led the troops in. I am built like a draft horse..I sure wouldn't have run the 100 yard dash against those trainees !

Although I was OK at pullups and very good at situps..we already had a "pushup machine" type guy in residence. My specialty was full gear and run the hills..and the way the sand shifts and slips under boots, it was a great "rebellion tamer"

As I told my grandson when he entered the Marines 7 years ago, " You will think that your DI hates you more than anyone ever could, but the last couple days he will be your best friend..he was only being like that to keep you alive when the stuff hits the fan".
Now that he is a combat-experienced platoon Sgt at Parris Island..he uses the same method...and ironically, his specialty is, 'full gear and run the sandy trails'.

...And you're right; if they never did it, they'll never know !

ironglow · « **Reply #198 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:27:26 PM »

TM;
There is no 'burden' of evidence on me...unlike you, I am not trying to rewrite history. You must find it difficult to draw a detailed picture..with an empty quill ! I don't feel I any need to answer your 30 questions, especially since most of them are baseless any; but I will answer a few, just to illustrate that truth.

Your baseless question "1) Many Jews survived the camps because their health held up, so they were able to produce goods/services for the 3rd reich and thus worth keeping. Some survived because of their special skills..plumbers, machinists, dentists etc. Others, such as my brother's in-laws survived because they were swept up late..just months before liberation.

Your baseless question #3) Yes there was an inmate infirmary for; A) A place to keep otherwise physically fit people on the job and B) As a place to do their hellish experiments on people..Dr Mengele for one had a penchant for experimenting on twins. I believe that in one case, the ones able to work were allowed a theatre company (their own actors)..kept them occupied at no cost, as the nazis saw it. A brothel for prisoners? ...you better go back to smoking plain tobacco !

Your baseless question #21) This one is a yooper ! No credible witness claimed they could tell nationality of the victims, but they could tell if they were new arrivals or some who were imprisoned for a while.. the fresh ones had some fat on them, unlike the ones on starvation diets. Nationality may be assumed if say, they were shipping fresh bodies in from Holland, then the fat laced, greasy smoke would be Dutch..I guess. When you say crematoriums produce no visible smoke, undoubtedly you are comparing civilian crematoriums with their current, stringent rules to operate in a community. The SS was not so finiky as today's City Health Dept ! DUH !

I will finish with your
Baseless question #2) It appears you, like many confirmed lefties are not above making up "statistics" or "facts" out of whole cloth ! Still, you may be sneakily "parsing" your words (Ala Clinton), your claim is that Eisenhower did not mention the concentration camps !
Here is an excerpt from Eisenhower's "Crusade in Europe". http://www.808th.com/europe/05e_gotha.htm
I have in my library , the 3-volume set of "The Patton Papers", in volume 3 from page 747 to 789, there is many a reference to these holocaust camps. Patton even tells us of the day Eisenhower came to one of the camps to deliver a speech.

powderman · « **Reply #199 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:28:03 PM »

Quote

...But please, start out by indicating which nation or force you were serving..

Thats what I'd like to know. POWDERMAN.

ironglow · « **Reply #200 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:31:09 PM »

Again; with baseless question #2) You indicate that Churchill did not endorse the fact that Nazis were running extermination camps. Shucks; that doesn't jibe with what Churchill himself said; http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/genocide/churchill_holocaust_01.shtml

ironglow · « **Reply #201 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:34:31 PM »

  Again, as evidence of Eisenhower's view of the Nazi atrocity camps;

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/genocide/churchill_holocaust_01.shtml

TM;
  Seeing that you are so far from fact with just your questions..1 , 2, 3 , and 21...why in blue blazes should I waste my time with the rest ?

NOW; How about your military experience ?

billy_56081 · « **Reply #202 on:** January 10, 2011, 03:30:47 PM »

I think we all can agree that it is of no use in trying to convince TM that he is wrong. What we can all keep doing is keep exposing his lies so further generations do not fall for this hate mongering garbage. As in some earlier lines in this thread all we have to do is cut and paste his own posts to show the discrepencies in his agenda.

powderman · « **Reply #203 on:** January 10, 2011, 04:14:38 PM »

BILLY, IRONGLOW. Good posts, good questions, still no answers. Big shock there. POWDERMAN.

ironglow · « **Reply #204 on:** January 10, 2011, 11:45:31 PM »

Correction;
I mistakenly posted Churchill twice, when I intended on posting an additional Eisenhower statement. This is from "Crusade in Europe"..the book where Eisenhower "didn't even mention the death camps"...

http://remember.org/Facts.aft.lib.eis.html

ironglow · « **Reply #205 on:** January 10, 2011, 11:58:39 PM »

TM;
Your question #26 reveals much about your research and tendancy to "cling to straws". Youir question;

" 26) Why has there been no effort to respond to the Leuchter report ?"

My answer;

There undoubtedly has been no effort to respond to the Leuchter report for the same reason I did not respond to the majority of your questions above.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leuchter_report

If a serious study were to respond to Mr...or Herr Leuchter, they may as well respond to every Donald Duck or Elmer Fudd who challenges them. Most serious scholars would not stain their credibility by doing so !

note: "Herr" is German for "Mr"..

ironglow · « **Reply #206 on:** January 12, 2011, 12:30:38 PM »

TM states;
It should be remembered that as a matter of fact,,,English and American troops only liberated conc camps in Germany,,,NOT in Poland which were liberated by Bolsevik Red story tellers. Your citations of Eisenhower and Chruchhill only colloborate that Typhus, starvation and disease were endemic in these prisons at the collapse at war's end.....NOT that mass extermination plan was ongoing nor equipment in place to perform such crimes which would have been logistically impossible for a country vastly outnumbered under assault from all quarters. It also is discrediting the fact that gentiles also perished in these camps...perhaps more than chosenist.....this is again the holocaust monoploy in action, which is essentially an anti-gentile, quilt, and nwo movement.

Yes, according to Eisenhower's testimony..as he entered Gotha he saw numerous bodies lying around that had been shot through the head...I guess typhus, starvation and disease did thhe shooting !

Then you say, " NOT that mass extermination plan was ongoing nor equipment in place to performsuch crimes which would have been logistically impossible for a country vastly outnumbered under assault from all quarters"..

Sheesh TM ! I may be wrong, but it sure sounds like you are taking up for the Nazi regime..

Nobody is discounting the gentiles who also died at the hands of the Nazis.. after all, the Nazis were bent on producing their own Wagnerian "gotterdammerung".. They murdered many Russian pesants also..just give them lots of red meat to hack..

powderman · « **Reply #207 on:** January 12, 2011, 12:54:45 PM »

Quote

Sheesh TM ! I may be wrong, but it sure sounds like you are taking up for the Nazi regime..

IRONGLOW. You noticed that too I see. Big shock there, after all, they were murdering Jews. POWDERMAN.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #208 on:** January 12, 2011, 02:36:57 PM »

Quote from: ironglow on January 12, 2011, 12:30:38 PM

Sheesh TM ! I may be wrong, but it sure sounds like you are taking up for the Nazi regime..

IG you just noticed this?

slim rem 7 · « **Reply #209 on:** January 13, 2011, 04:29:39 AM »

i kinda liked the movie dances with wolves.. it showed evil warlike native americans and also the greed and assumed superiority that the white intruders could be guilty of..it also had peaceful surviving tribes ..in my opinion
greed and power is not a race characteristic..it can be found in any people..
i just believe that people of that time were a tough bunch ,whether good or bad..jmo..slim