The debate over Russian boars: Good for sports hunting and tourism? Or destructive to Michigan farms?
By Rosemary Parker, Kalamazoo Gazette; found at Mlive.com
December 05, 2010LANSING — Are Russian boars Public Enemy No. 1, or a hot tourist draw that boost rural economies?
In the wild, the huge, hairy beasts tear up farm fields and habitat and carry diseases that threaten the state’s $300 million commercial pork industry. Environmentalists and pork producers are pushing to ban the animals from Michigan.
But “sport swine” are gold for private game ranch owners who have built their businesses on boar hunts, and want to be allowed to continue to breed and hunt them on their own lands.
The issue will come to a head Thursday when Rebecca Humphries, director of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, is expected to act on the proposed ban or order stricter rules to regulate ownership of the sport-swine species. Humphries will address the issue at the Michigan Natural Resources Commission’s meeting in Lansing.
Game ranch owners say banning Russian boars and other exotic swine — or even strengthening regulation of those animals — could drive ranches out of business and hurt other state businesses that benefit from their tourism draw.
But with the state’s natural resources and pork industry hanging in the balance, it’s unclear whether their voice will be heard.
In the end, the matter may be settled in the courts.
Anti-hunting, anti-business?If Russian boars are declared illegal invasive species under the state’s Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, “you’re gonna wipe out about 40 to 50 businesses within the state in about six months — they’ll be gone,” said Doug Miller, owner of Thunder Hills Ranch near Jackson.
Miller believes the proposal is simply anti-hunting prejudice aimed at further decimating the state’s $60 million game ranch industry, which is down to 445 ranches this year, compared to 815 in 2004.
Pig hunts are the bread and butter of the smaller game ranches, Miller said. The animals provide an affordable entry into the world of private hunting, Miller said, as groups can split the cost of a $525 hog hunt and come away with hundreds of pounds of meat.
“Everyone can afford to do that, plus they get the meat,” Miller said. “My deer hunts start at $2,000 and go to $10,000,” not an option for as many hunters, he said.
“The really huge places, they’ll stay in business because they shoot $50,000 deer,” Miller said.
Long-standing troublePig hunts have been offered at game ranches for at least 15 years, but swine are not included in regulations for the facilities. Those rules are designed largely to keep deer and elk contained on the properties and not mingling with the state’s wild deer herd, said Shannon Hanna, a wildlife biologist and special-projects coordinator with the DNRE.
“The fencing and all regulations in that law are for deer. A 10-foot fence doesn’t keep a pig from running underneath it,” she said.
And when pigs escape, they can wreak havoc.
In the wild, they breed prolifically and brandish their curved tusks at anyone or anything that stirs their ill temper. They have been sighted in every county in the state.
Since 2006, Hanna has scrambled to monitor the unregulated sport-swine trade as it overlaps her work with the licensed high-fence deer and elk farms in the state.
Although there is no official mechanism for tracking the number of feral swine, the DNRE estimates 3,000 to 5,000 wild pigs roam the state, and wildlife officials believe most are the offspring of escapees from game ranches.
Miller said no pig has escaped its enclosure since he opened his ranch in 1995, and he questions the validity of the DNRE estimates.
But environmental groups and pork producers have seen the troubles feral swine have caused in other states, and hope to stop the problem here before it gets worse.
The DNRE’s wildlife division has determined that the sport pigs fit the definition of invasive species — they are not native to the state, have demonstrated the potential to harm people and natural and agricultural resources, and are nearly impossible to control or eradicate once populations become established.
If the director of the DNRE signs an order declaring wild sport swine prohibited invasive species, ownership and propagation of Russian boars and other wild pigs for hunting would be against the law.
“If the director signs that order, it’s game over,” Hanna said.
But the director could also use the threat of such an order to push along laws regulating ownership of swine. For example, the order declaring wild swine illegal could be written to take effect by a specified date unless strict regulatory legislation was adopted.
Groups weigh inThe debate over wild boars revolves around money: Does the contribution of sport swine to Michigan’s economy outweigh the risks associated with their escape and spread in the wild?
“We think the director should sign the (invasive species) order and prohibit the keeping of (sport) hogs in Michigan,” said Dennis Fijalkowski, executive director of the Michigan Wildlife Conservancy. Regulation is not practical, he said, and the measures needed to prevent pigs from escaping are too expensive for the industry to adopt.
Don Koivisto. director of the Michigan Department of Agriculture, said he believes that, at the very least, there should be “no new ones (game ranches) allowed while we are working on (problems created by) the old ones.”
Michigan United Conservation Clubs supports the director signing an order banning the wild boars, which would take effect if legislation regulating the industry is not in place “in a pretty short time frame,” said Amy Trotter, resource policy manager for the club.
“If we can regulate them adequately,” with full funding to implement the regulations, “then fine. MUCC’s position is we don’t want any hunter/angler money used to regulate (swine).
“Our concern at MUCC has been if the Legislature fails to act, or waters down recommendations from the swine work group.”
Contact Rosemary Parker at rparker@kalamazoogazette.com or 269-388-2734.
http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2010/12/the_debate_over_russian_wild_b.html