« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: LWC Question  (Read 1453 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Old Griz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2030
  • Gender: Male
LWC Question
« on: December 19, 2010, 01:00:31 PM »
The .38 148-gr. LWC and great on small game. How would they be for a self/home defense load? Range is gonna be pretty close. Can't get any more meplat. Cuts a nice hole. What do you think?

Gun is a Model 10 4" non+P.
Logged
Griz
<*}}}><

I Cor. 2.2 "For I determined not to know anything among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified."

Offline Bigeasy

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1986
  • Gender: Male
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2010, 01:32:48 PM »
They work well on small game like rabbit and tree rats, but I would not trust the penetration for self defense.  Once I shot a buck with a rifle.  When I got to him, he was down, but still alive.  I decided to shoot him in the base of the skull with the waddcutter load you are talking about.  It went in, maybe half an inch.  Then he really started kicking..  When I later skinned him, I was able to pull the bullet out of the bone with a pair of pliers.  Stick to full power hard cast semi-waddcutter hollow points (the old FBI load),  or light weight hollow points at plus P velocities to get the most stopping power out of the 38spl.
Logged
Personal opinion is a good thing, and everyone is entitled to one.  The hard part is separating informed opinion from someone who is just blowing hot air....

Offline SwampThing762

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2010, 06:11:24 PM »
I will cast my vote for hardcast flat nose bullets with 90% meplat.  I have gotten them to penetrate through wet newspaper over 22 inches with my 44 Mag HandiRifle (never did penetration tests with Ruger SB revolver, but I would expect similar results).

ST762
Logged
We learned the true nature of Islam on 11 Sept 2001.

Show your appreciation for Islam....eat more bacon.

"Non nobis Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam." (Not to us Lord, not us, but to your name give the glory)  -- Knights Templar motto

Offline southernutah

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2010, 08:26:14 PM »
I have a video where the vic accidentaly shot himself with a 38 wad cutter,didn't move just died.  My not be the recomended but seemed to work. I think a lot of the stats on knock down  are hype.
Logged

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2010, 01:00:58 AM »
Old Griz:  the 38 lwc is a excellent self defense round/bullet.  If you use either the flat base 141 gn slug or the hollow base 148 gn slug and load them yourself you can load them right up to better than 1200'/sec from a 6" M10 (old Lyman loading).  When I was in South America and assigned to escort duty, because we could not get 357 magnum ammo we just loaded our own hollow based wc slugs, backwards, at over 1200'/sec.  In one situation in Bogata we found them to be very effective.  I would have no problem using them for self defense again.

And, of course, as the Europeans believe - you would have to be a complete fool to step in front of a 38 spl target round, but there are a lot of fools in the world.......
Logged

Offline Kmrere42

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 305
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2010, 04:47:48 PM »
Uhh,


Before this goes any farther,  Hollow base wad cutters should never be driven over book loads in the 750 - 850 fps range. 

The skirts will separate and stay in the bore causing an obstruction when firing the next round.  (Ka-boom)


Even when reversed they will lead badly and are a real pain to speed load,  stick with bulk JHP's




Paul
Logged

Offline Glock Doctor

  • Glock Magic!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61
  • Gender: Male
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2011, 03:22:37 AM »
That'll work.  If I couldn't get 158 grain LSWCHP loads, (FBI) I'd use them. 
Logged
‘Life Is Karma.  It Reflects Both Past And Present Circumstance.  Our Time Here Is Short; So Choose Carefully And Behave Well; For, All Of Your Tomorrows Are Presently Being Decided.’

Offline Mohawk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1958
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2011, 06:11:01 PM »
Work fine.
Logged

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18263
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #8 on: January 05, 2011, 12:45:31 AM »
agreed but i would stay away from the ones that are swadged or cast from pure lead and load them to at least 800 fps. Bottom line though is that even the pure or swadged ones would probably work.
Quote from: Mohawk on January 04, 2011, 06:11:01 PM
Work fine.
Logged
blue lives matter

Offline StrawHat

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 550
  • Gender: Male
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2011, 01:28:50 AM »
When I carried the 35 bore, my load of choice was a hard cast 148 wadcutter bullet loaded to 900 fps.  It did a great job on targets, raccoons, and other vermin.  Penetration needs to be seen to be believed. 

I remember a thread where a Coroner provided information on the terminal ballistics of the wadcutter versus other shapes.  He indicated he preferred them.

I have also tried soft wadcutters but they are not in the same league.  The reversed HBWC was also tried but for what I wanted, the expansion was too much and penetration was lacking.
Logged
"Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result"  Winston Churchill

"A law without a punishment is merely advice."  anonymous

Offline Dale53

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 70
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #10 on: January 09, 2011, 09:04:48 PM »
I regularly use a dbl ended w/c in my .38 Specials and .357 magnums. The solid wadcutters can be loaded full tilt with out issues. The HBWC will, as has been stated above separate and leave the skirt in the barrel if driven too fast (I have been present over a period of time when this happened on three occasions). Two barrels were ruined and I managed to stop the third shooter before he fired the next shot when I noticed part of the bullet base extending out of the muzzle.

The full house wadcutter gives you about all you can get in the .38 Special. It was recommended by that great old shooter Ed McGivern (it used to be available as a factory load "back in the day") as well as the New York Stakeout Squad. The New York Stakeout Squad run by Jim Cirillo were issued these loads.

Dale53
Logged

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
Re: LWC Question
« Reply #11 on: January 10, 2011, 12:33:33 AM »
Didn't someone post recently, within the past year, a link or pictures of some 200 gn hardcast wadcutters along with some 250(?) gn swc slugs made by a custom bullet maker?  I recall seeing the picture or going to the link and saying to myself - ouch dude, that would hurt.......
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »