Author Topic: I'm torn between two new 1911's  (Read 4331 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
I'm torn between two new 1911's
« on: January 02, 2011, 06:31:47 AM »
This is my new years resolution to purchase a gun a month (minumum) in 2011.  I'm torn between a Thompson Custom 1911a1 45acp in stainless and a Colt Goverment 1911a1 45acp in stainless too for this month.  I just may get both to test.  As my wish list is growing i'm after the stainless 1911's first.  My third and last stainless 1911 will be a springfield armory loaded(february). Then i'll be going after the nickel finished 1911's(38 super/45acp) by march/april i hope thats my plan.  I'm thinking the $800 to $1,200 1911's first then going fror the more expensive one.  Or should i say a more expensive "1" 1911, like just 1. I been eyeing the wilson combat frame/slide for a possible build(maybe) in the future.  I need to find a local dealer who can get me a frame for my first 1911 build. I seem to get eye's rolling when i ask about getting a frame for doing a build.  I been thinking about getting my ffl01 license to cut them out too. But thats my new years resolution and plan so far.  CZY

Offline williamlayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15415
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2011, 08:08:55 AM »
I am thinking that your quest to be able to do your own work will suffice you with more than enough quality 1911's---equal to anything you can purchase.
Blessings
TEXAS, by GOD

Offline gray-wolf

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2011, 08:46:33 AM »
Glad to hear your not still all tangled up in that 1911 spring thing.  ::) ::)
Just a thought  Did you ever consider getting just one 1911 and working with it until it was as perfect as you could get it ?? .
  Your a funny guy  ::)

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2011, 02:20:55 PM »
Glad to hear your not still all tangled up in that 1911 spring thing.  ::) ::)
Just a thought  Did you ever consider getting just one 1911 and working with it until it was as perfect as you could get it ?? .
  Your a funny guy  ::)

I'm about all sprung out on recoil springs for now. ::)

With brand new 1911's i wonder now if the'll function right out of the box or not for me.  Has my curse of getting bad guns broken or not? I want to know will i get a good functioning 1911 or not right out of the box brand new. But its different now, because i have some knowledge to fix it.

I'm retired and its "me" time now.  I'm tweeking in my norinco 1911a1 as i go with learning at the sametime.  I think my norinco has a little farther to go with tightening up the frame rails.  Then i did it all from installing the new barrel and national match barrel bushing.  Ramping the opposite end on the disconnector on the bottom of the slide too. Once the frame rails are a tad tighter and i do the work on the ejection port we will benchrest it at 25yds to see how she can shoot.  ;) I installed and fitted the adjustable trigger and lubed the sear.  Other than installing new sights i'm almost finished with it. The norc just maybe the best 1911 in my fleet of 1911's.

I would like to collect a few more 1911's in different finishes and calibers.   Then i'll be interested in doing my very first build next.  I want to do a plain jane 1911a1 for a shooter/beater.  I just need a frame for that one. I'm interested in the wilson combat frame/slide kit too for another build. I still need somemore 1911 tools too. But i'm on a roll now with the holidays all over.

Online DDZ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6164
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2011, 12:30:27 PM »
1911crazy, if you don't have the Wilson sear jig, its a great tool for making a so-so trigger into a great trigger. I was surprised how well my trigger turned out. Maybe some of it was just by luck, but I really doubt I could have ended up with a better trigger getting it done at a custom shop.
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.    Wm. Penn

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2011, 04:00:55 AM »
I still need more 1911 tools and fixtures too.

Now i'm thinking about a new 1911 in stanless but i want a forged slide and frame too.  I think the springfield armory loaded model is the only forged/slide-frame out there in the stainless finish.  Plus i wanted an adjustable rear site too.  I need to sit down and make a list on what i want my new stainless 1911 to have.  I have eliminated some 1911's on my want list already. I have enough 1911's that are casted for now but i may go back to them later on (low budget 1911's just to test them) and now its time to get into the little better quality ones. I'd like to move up slowly, in quality and  price wise as i go. CZY

BTW;  What difference do we expect to see between the higher / middle priced 1911's when we compare them to the lower priced 1911's???

Will the fit and finish be better?  (overall quality)

The accuracy be better?

If not what seperates the catagories of the low priced 1911's to the mid priced 1911's to the high priced 1911's, do we really get what were paying the higher dollars for?

The bottomline is what do you expect from the more expensive 1911 that the lower priced 1911 doesn't have or doesn't do?                             

Once were past the $800 price tag whats the difference?

Then were past the $1,200 price tag and whats the difference then?

Then were between $2,000 to $3,000 for a 1911 does the qwuality get any better?

I've seen some 1911's go for $5000 there hand built customs but do we really get what we pay for?  I don't think i'll be buying one of these in the future.

My point is we have many different price ranges for each class of 1911. We have a 1911 for each budget.    CZY

Offline buck460XVR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 977
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2011, 06:57:44 AM »
This is my new years resolution to purchase a gun a month (minumum) in 2011.  I'm torn between a Thompson Custom 1911a1 45acp in stainless and a Colt Goverment 1911a1 45acp in stainless too for this month.  I just may get both to test.  As my wish list is growing i'm after the stainless 1911's first.  My third and last stainless 1911 will be a springfield armory loaded(february). Then i'll be going after the nickel finished 1911's(38 super/45acp) by march/april i hope thats my plan.  I'm thinking the $800 to $1,200 1911's first then going fror the more expensive one. 


I look at guns like I look at sex. Some go for quantity, some for quality. When I was young and foolish, I had to have as many guns and woman as I could get, regardless of how cheap and trashy they were. I have since come to the realization that having less of something, but having it be better is what I prefer. If I had the amount of monies to spend as you are talkin', I'd not spend $800 a month on 1911's, but $2400-$3200 every three or four months and get something of heirloom quality. I'd rather shoot 1000 rounds a month outta two quality 1911s as to shoot that many rounds thru 6 POS guns. But that's just me.
"where'd you get the gun....son?"

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2011, 09:07:46 AM »
I'm thinking a few new 1911's between the cost of $800 to $1,200 maybe 1 or 2.  One in stainless in 45acp and another in polished stainless or nickel finish in 38 super. 

I did look at the les baer too and it was $1,930 for a custom match fit guarented 3" groups at 50yds. I know the Ed Brown and Wilson Combat 1911's are in that same area too.  But i'm not ready for one of these yet. I'd still like to see how the cheaper 1911's shoot when compared to each other.  I'm still thinking about a wilson combat build kit.  CZY

Offline ole 5 hole group

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2011, 12:15:52 PM »
I did look at the les baer too and it was $1,930 for a custom match fit guarented 3" groups at 50yds.

Give John a call and he'll fix you right up with a shooter.  Price is right and you nor anyone else is capable of shooting a 10-shot group measuring 1.5" at 50 yards but you can own one of these bad boys for not much more than your current dollar limit of $1,200.00.  The Baer PII is one fine pistol as is the SRP.   http://www.cj1911heaven.com/

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2011, 01:25:08 PM »
The Les brown will be at my end of buying spree 1911's. Maybe i have a few other choices to look at by then.  The STI, wilson combat and the ed brown look interesting too.  Guarenteed accuracy at 50yds i'm not sure about, but using a pistol rest to check it would work.  Right now i'm interested in the mid priced 1911's.

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18253
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2011, 01:36:05 AM »
personaly i feel about the same as i do when it comes to ar15s. For about a grand you can buy a real nice gun. All the gun that 99percent of us will ever need. Sure a wilson, ed brown or even a les baer may be a sligtly better gun then a colt gold cup, kimber gold match or an sti trojan but in my opinion its about like paying a 100 percent more for a gun that is 5 percent better. You will never convince me that any 1911 is worth 3 grand.
blue lives matter

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #11 on: January 10, 2011, 06:18:18 AM »
personaly i feel about the same as i do when it comes to ar15s. For about a grand you can buy a real nice gun. All the gun that 99percent of us will ever need. Sure a wilson, ed brown or even a les baer may be a sligtly better gun then a colt gold cup, kimber gold match or an sti trojan but in my opinion its about like paying a 100 percent more for a gun that is 5 percent better. You will never convince me that any 1911 is worth 3 grand.

I've seen custom built 1911's going for $5k recently.  I don't think i'd go over $2k and thats a big maybe but down the road as i get bored who knows were i'll end up buying. I think i'll have a fork in the road soon between building 1911's and buying new 1911's. Maybe reworking the wornout used 1911's will be my nitch? On the other hand i can buy a lot of the $400 to $500 new 1911's for $3k to $5k right and have more to play with. But there short on quality and maybe workmanship but if they shoot the way a 1911 should function there ok with me.  I'm for the underdogs.

First i'm very, very, very frugal, i'm not cheap, i'm frugal.  With that said i never spent more than $500 for any handgun in the past.  I think we can get a decent bargain basement 1911 at an entry level price.  My new Auto Ordnance army ww2 copy proves this when it was just $389.  I'm sure there are other good buys at the entry level of the 1911's too.  If your looking for an occasional shooter or home protection these affordable 1911 will serve you well.  Now if we look at the next price level of $800 to $1,200 we probably get the best buy for a 1911.  We move into the forged frames/slides, plus better sights and maybe even more accessories at this level.  The Springfield armory loaded and the Colt gold cup falls into this level also.  I think this price range is the best nitch for a decent++ 1911 quality wise.  I hope to get a few so i can rate them as to what i got, if its a decent buy of not.

I'm trying to learn everything about repairing, tweeking, tuning and building a 1911.  I'm learning as i go making changes on my chinese norinco.  I installed a new $59 45acp 5" barrel from sportsmans guide and a nationam match barrel bushing IAI $8 from CDNN investments.  I did all the fitting myself.  I did have the Jerry K armorers video and his 45acp/1911 shop manual.  Now my norc with a loose slide to frame rail fit shoots 1 clover leaf per mag using russian wolf 45acp ball ammo.  My point is now can it do even better when i tighten up the loose frame rails to slide fit? We will see soon. Now I have the extractor tuning tools and i'm going for the frame rails/slide tools soon.  At the sametime i need to get the sear fixtures/hammer tools too.  My point is i'm headed towards doing complete builds.  I been thinking of a wilson combat kit build.  And my own cheap build that i just need the frame for to start on it. I think the builds can be the best if were fussy about all the fitting being on the money. I never skimp nor accept anything but the best quality workmanship that i can do. My time and money doesn't factor in too i'm after perfection and having deadlines is a joke too. It will get done when its right.  CZY

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #12 on: January 13, 2011, 04:37:33 AM »
Here's my 1911 choice of the month 1/2011. I never really knew how hard it can be to pick another new 1911 out. I looked at all the 1911's within the $800 to $1,200 price range trying to find the next new 1911 i wanted.  I changed my thoughts do to some having what i wanted when some didn't and right now my requirements are from the factory;

1. Stainless finish
2. Adjustable rear sight
3. Forged Frame/Slide

I chose the springfield armory 1911 for my very first 2011 buy;

Springfield Armory "Loaded Model" in 45acp #PI 9132LP

stainless
forged frame/slide
target matched barrel/bushing
adjustable rear sight

I will have this one in 1/2011 soon.    CZY

I really liked the SA in the trophy matched model but i hate the look of the added flared mag well. I like the basic looking 1911 i guess i'm a purist. I don't even like the extended mags with the plastic shoe on them.

Offline Eugene

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #13 on: May 30, 2011, 12:50:19 PM »
personally i feel about the same as i do when it comes to AR15s. For about a grand you can buy a real nice gun. All the gun that 99percent of us will ever need. Sure a Wilson, ed brown or even a Les Bear may be a slightly better gun then a colt gold cup, Kimber gold match or an sti Trojan but in my opinion its about like paying a 100 percent more for a gun that is 5 percent better. You will never convince me that any 1911 is worth 3 grand.

Its all about how much you shoot them, to some a box of 50 round every second month is alot of shooting, 500 round per week, every week is about my norm.

I used to think the same, 20 years ago, I bought Norinco's and alike, but after spending money to get them to the point they were worthwhile of shooting, and having them halve in value, not any more.

In late 1999 I bought an SVI (infinity) one of the first with the full length dust cover, heavy flat top slide, bomars, fibre optic front, Schumann barrel, all stainless, it has the interchangeable breech face, interchangeable trigger shoe, titanium innards, tool steel hammer and sear, the very best you could buy at the time, cost me over $3800. with 4 mags.

Well, that SVI and I went on to shoot over 250,000 round of major power factor 40 S&W IPSC loads, back when the power factor out here was 175, I know how many rounds as I bought primers in lots of 25000, about a years worth.

I shot cast, coated, jacketed, mixed brass, everything you could think of, total gun related malfunctions in 11 years, ZERO.

I had a few backwards primers in reloads when I was using a Lee 1000 POS press, now a Dillon 650, ammo perfect.

I could not imagine any $500 gun doing this, all I changed was recoil springs and buffers, I used Wilson's ultimate lube on rails and hood, some heavy grease in the link area, and chip McCormick ultimate trigger job lube on sear/hammer etc surfaces.

This gun never stopped, ever, it was re barrel after 40 cal was banned in Australia, the original barrel is still like new, over 200000 rounds, the Lissner .38 super barrel in its place is like new after 50,000 major PF loads.

no Para, Llama, Bul M5 or norinco will ever do this.

The SVI was factory built, never saw a gunsmith but for the barrel, and still like new.

Had an STI built a few years back, stainless, lissner barrel, same spec as above, but never liked it like the SVI, sold it, now I wish I didn't, the guy who built it was one of, if not the best 1911 gunsmith in Australia, he has now passed on, so another is out of the question.

I am now on the hunt for another STI or SVI, in 357 Sig, budget is about $5000.Aust, unsure whether to get a built SVI from the factory, as the Aussie importer tries to pass himself off as a Gunsmith, but I think he is a welder who owns a milling machine, have seen too many of his guns just not work. no thanks.

Maybe an STI.

Buy nice guns, use them lots, $1000. is cheap. you deserve better.

Offline williamlayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15415
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #14 on: May 30, 2011, 04:23:52 PM »
Eugene is right on the button--for his purpose.
I have always advocated good weapons. I don't have any use for a competition gun--reliability is the primary desire.
STI is good--and--off the line has VERY GOOD parts and is well built.
If I were to buy another 1911 I think I would get a Wilson or Brown--simple, straight forward 1911.
I just can't leave well enough alone.
Blessings
TEXAS, by GOD

Offline Eugene

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2011, 05:12:21 PM »
Eugene is right on the button--for his purpose.
I have always advocated good weapons. I don't have any use for a competition gun--reliability is the primary desire.
STI is good--and--off the line has VERY GOOD parts and is well built.
If I were to buy another 1911 I think I would get a Wilson or Brown--simple, straight forward 1911.
I just can't leave well enough alone.
Blessings

Thanks,

I would happily carry either of these comp guns for defence, I know they work, each and every time, no good for IPSC if they dont, thats why I like to shoot them alot, it sorts out any issues.

The wilson and brown guns are great examples of defense guns, they work, no frills, bulletproof, if you will pardon the pun. My comp guns are not ammo sensitive jam-o-matics, they work, they will keep a full mag in a dime at 25 yards with reloads or factory stuff.

But, if I was buying for self defence, a Wilson, Les Baer, or Ed Brown would be right up there and STI, just not all the bells and whistles that a comp gun has. What cal I would choose would be tough, I love 38super, like a semi auto 357 mag with the light bullets, 357 sig seem to be doing the job, 40S&W is a proven permormer too, 10mm and 45 dont hold too much interest for me, but I would not refuse either if it was a good gun, I just would not chase one down. 9mm would not even get a start.

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2011, 08:04:46 AM »
I believe the 40cal is a trade off because most couldn't handle the 10mm that was offered first to the leo's.  So they lowered the power and made the 40cal that anyone can handle now.  I been a die hard 45acp guy thru all of this and really thought it as reinventing the wheel with these new wizz bang calibers.   When given the choice i always went down the straight and narrow with the ever famous 45acp.  But i'm wandering down the road now with a fork in it and which choice to make is almost insite now.

I got distracted from purchasing my next new 1911 by the $699 cost of the new S&W model 57 in 41mag when they list for $1,161.Then they also had the S&W M58 in 41mag for $699 too.  At almost half price these are very hard to pass up in the S&W nickel finish.  With some of that sillyness behind me now i'm browsing the 1911's again.  But i really won't spend too much on one. I figure my range is between $400 to $1,200 right now.  I'm also looking at the older C&R 1911's too.

Offline Eugene

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #17 on: May 31, 2011, 07:16:51 PM »
I believe the 40cal is a trade off because most couldn't handle the 10mm that was offered first to the leo's.  So they lowered the power and made the 40cal that anyone can handle now.  I been a die hard 45acp guy thru all of this and really thought it as reinventing the wheel with these new wizz bang calibers.   When given the choice i always went down the straight and narrow with the ever famous 45acp.  But i'm wandering down the road now with a fork in it and which choice to make is almost insite now.

I got distracted from purchasing my next new 1911 by the $699 cost of the new S&W model 57 in 41mag when they list for $1,161.Then they also had the S&W M58 in 41mag for $699 too.  At almost half price these are very hard to pass up in the S&W nickel finish.  With some of that sillyness behind me now i'm browsing the 1911's again.  But i really won't spend too much on one. I figure my range is between $400 to $1,200 right now.  I'm also looking at the older C&R 1911's too.

You are spont on about the 40 being a trade off, after the 10mm was introduced, it was too much gun for alot of officers, but the calibre worked well in stopping bad guy, held more rounds, etc etc, so along come the 40S&W (or 40 small and weak).

I like the 40's ability to handle a wide range of projectile weights with ease, the 135 gr really hit hard, I have dropped a bit of meduim game at short range and they work well, the 180's thump nice and hard too.

In my opinion, the 45acp with 230gr at 830-850 fps is just not going fast enough, if heavy cover or a big thick hide, (shoulder blade on a reasonnable size pig) seems to run out of puff, I like velocity, I know the 45acp can be hot rodded up, but for me, I would rather a 155gr 40 cal at about 1300-1320fps, it hits hard, shoots flat and stops them.

Now I dont want you guys to think this is a 45acp bash-a-thon, I have owned plenty of them, love them, but my preference has changed over the years. If I was carrying for self defence, a hot loaded 45acp or 10mm would be my first choice, bullet weight of 175-180gr, zipping out at at over 1400 in 10mm. Take the fight out of most with enough frontal area to have good knock down ability.

Take care, enjoy your new toys, I know I would, regardless of calibre.

Offline williamlayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15415
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #18 on: June 01, 2011, 08:22:09 AM »
Eugene
Share an opinion of the 9x23.
Blessings
TEXAS, by GOD

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #19 on: June 01, 2011, 03:35:09 PM »
If we hot rod the 45acp/1911 with hotter ammo it wasn't designed for don't we beat the gun up?  I still like the 45acp and would rust my life with it.  I wonder without seeing the ballastics how does the 45acp 185gr+P ammo ballastics compare to the 40cal and the 10mm rounds.  Stopping power wise?  I figure with the 185gr+P the 1911 in 45acp is the best it can be power wise but i maybe wrong.  I never ventured past the 230gr FMJ's or is there a heavier cast bullet that has more umph?

Offline Eugene

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #20 on: June 01, 2011, 07:41:10 PM »
If we hot rod the 45acp/1911 with hotter ammo it wasn't designed for don't we beat the gun up?  I still like the 45acp and would rust my life with it.  I wonder without seeing the ballastics how does the 45acp 185gr+P ammo ballastics compare to the 40cal and the 10mm rounds.  Stopping power wise?  I figure with the 185gr+P the 1911 in 45acp is the best it can be power wise but i maybe wrong.  I never ventured past the 230gr FMJ's or is there a heavier cast bullet that has more umph?

Hi again,

No problems to "hot rod" a 45acp in a 1911, they are a great design, but it has to be done properly, a poorly fitted barrel, without enough locking lug engagement, poor link and hoof fitting etc will see you beat up a 1911 pretty fast, the barrel will go first, the locking lugs will round off, then the whole thing goes to hell in a handbasket, takedown pins break, lower lugs crack from barrels and then "experts" blame a poor design. WRONG.

All of the parts in the lock, fire and unlock work together, dropping in a surplus barrel will work most of the time, but not much good to "hot-rod" as the unsupported chamber and brass designed for low operating presures will see buldged cases and such pretty fast.

To do one properly, and I dont mean destroying a Union switch and signal or Singer WW2 issue, I mean a late model, dime a dozen Kimber or Springfield ( by dime a dozen, I mean still in manufacture with no colector value), you need a fully supported barrel, a Bar-Sto, schueman, Lissner (aussie) or alike, and have it fitted, or fit and get it done right, full lug engagement, hand fitted lower lugs etc. Every part will effect the next, the link must be correct for the locking lug, the hood length, barrel taper etc will control timing which will allow higher pressuers to be run safely.

You must also use good quality late model brass, it is thicker than old GI brass, dont try to hot up 50 year old remington stuff, you are just asking for trouble.

Running buffer pads and a "recoil reducing" guide rod, such as a Sprinco brand, will also help preserve the frame from being beat to death. change your recoil spring and buffer every 1000 round or so, they are cheap, a few dollars each, use good springs, the wolf springs are great, and again, cheap.

The 45 can be pushed pretty hard when all of the above is done, many 45's were used in IPSC and Bowling pin for years using 200 gr projectiles at well over 1200 fps, with great accuracy, I had a Clark barrel and slide on a Colt frame, race setup but no optics, would group under 2" at 50 yards. Fitted by a bloke who knew what he was doing.

My smith built STI will return to battery with the barrel in the same spot every time, I have measured it with a dial depth gauge, it is under 0.0005" variation shot to shot, again fitted by a master, Peter Murphey, RIP. This gun has zero perceivable play, slide to frame feels like one bit of metal, the barrel can not be pushed down at all when in battery, shake it and it wont rattle, however, every part just moves like it is teflon coated, no drag, hang up or binding, this gun is all stainless , both slide and frame, zero galling, it is mechanical perfection. I do like it. It does shoot, better than I ever can, I would love to machine rest it, I think it would keep most things honest to 75 yards.

If a 45 is done right, it will equal the 40 all day long and give the 10mm a scare, but the 10mm is a "HOT HOT HOT rod" from the factory, huge rifle like presures make it hard to beat, but recoil is strong, brass is $$$ etc, the 10mm from the factory is about as hot as you could every need, hand loading would be wild.

If you want to hear and shoot a real cracker jack, get a 9x25dillon, 90-100gr projectiles at 2100fps, noise that cannot be described, a shock wave from a compensated IPSC gun that will literally blow your hair back, your glasses and muffs off. They were banned from our club due to noise complaints, and punching holes in the popers.

As for the 9x23, it is a round I have never owned, but I do use the cases, as they are much thicker than 38super, which is based on the old 38ACP case, the Starline 38 Supercomp case has pretty well got it covered now.

The 9x23 feed better from the hi cap mags, as the rim is rebated  like the 9x19, the 38 super has a protruding rim, which can cause hang up in the mag and is harder to get under the extractor at times, the 9x23 just feeds. it can handle higher presures, feeds better and will function in most 38 super guns, some may require the extractor to be tuned, most wont though.

Great cal, sort of made redundant due to Starline and Hornady making cases that fix the small issues the 38 super had, but still a great round.

Take care.


Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #21 on: June 02, 2011, 07:13:03 AM »
Interesting reading thanks for the info.

I just shot my llama extra in 9mm largo and i was impressed with the little more bark it has over the std 9mm luger round.  I kind of like it but it leaves me wanting more bark/bite too.  I would be interested in something more powerful in a 9mm.  Maybe the 9x23win is it.  I think the 9mm largo is perfect for plinking fun.

My dealer has an indoor range and he rents guns to shoot there.  I may try a 10mm  and a 9x23win if he has them to rent to see how they shoot and if i like them. I think when i enter the unfamilair calibers I better try them first before i purchase one.  My wanting a more powerful auto is revived again now.  Dam i want them all.

Offline jcn59

  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1450
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #22 on: June 02, 2011, 07:51:36 PM »
What's the difference between .38 super, 9mm largo, and 9x23 except the rim?   Same gun, different ammo??
Vote them all out, EVERY election!
 
Does anyone remember the scene from "Quigley Down Under" showing the aborigines lined up on the skyline as far as you could see?   That needs to be US!
NRA Life Member

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #23 on: June 03, 2011, 02:38:31 AM »
jcn:  there are a number of differences.  The 38 Super is actually 22.8mm long and runs at about 30-32k psi pressures;  the 23mm length cases for the Largo, etc. are a full 23mm long as currently and historically loaded, will not allow for any more than 2 or 3 rounds in the 38 Super mag.  The 9mm Largo/Bergmann, Bayard, Bergman-Bayard and Mauser Export are all just that .2 silly millimeters longer and run at a bit less pressure than the 38 Super.  The 9x23 Winchester is a factory load that runs, from the factory, where the 38 Super is handloaded to, at higher pressures and velocities than factory 38 Supers.  The 9x23 Winchester takes a 125 gn 9mm slug at 1425'/sec - exactly what handloaders have often run the 38 Super to, which is why many shooters often compared those velocities to the fabled 357 magnums reputed 1 shot stopper and, questioned what the difference was.  Many shooters use 9x23 Winchester and 38 Super brass interchangeably.  Handloaders have hot rodded the 38 Super since factories went liability crazy (in the 1930s) and loaded the Super down to what the original 38 ACP was loaded to.  The 9x23 Winchester is the factory response to a hot 9mm round that will meet major power factors without casehead separations the 38 Super sometimes experiences.  Factory loaded 9x23mm Winchester feeds fine from all my 38 Super mags.

Most of the European 9x23mm length rounds ran at about 30k psi pressure and fired a 125-128 gn 9mm bullet to 1200-1250'/sec, in comparison to the first 9x19mm round (9mm Luger) that fired a 125 gn slug at only 1090'/sec - a lot of difference there for the Eurpoean rounds back then.  The 38 Automatic was a attempt to take a US 38 caliber revolver round and make it into a autoloading pistol round in, I think, the 1908 Colt pistols and the tiny rim on the 38 ACP and Super cases is a holdover.  The original velocity of the 38 Automatic was near 1220'/sec with a 130 gn slug, and by all accounts it was a flat shooting round.  When the 1911 and 1911A1 pistols were developed and proven much stronger than the 1908 Colts that fired the 38 Automatic, the 38 Super was developed (in the 1930s I think) for the 1911s and loaded to the original 38 Automatic specs while the 38 Automatic was reduced in velocity to near what the 9x19 was originally loaded to - factories also changed the brass - the 38 Super was loaded into nickled cases to differentiate them from the 38 Automatic which was loaded into brass cases, but the miniscule rim remained on both cases and was the cause for the reports of inaccuracy with both the 38 Automatic and the 38 Super; both cases are dimentionally identical. The 9x23 Winchester runs at somewhat higher pressures than the 38 Super, as one might expect. 

The 9x23 length cases are true 9mms - the case is slightly tapered with a rebated rim and the casehead is stronger than on the 38 Super which is a straight cased round with a tiny rim to it.  And I think that's about it.  HTH. 

Offline williamlayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15415
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #24 on: June 03, 2011, 03:45:27 AM »
There ya go.
Blessings
TEXAS, by GOD

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #25 on: June 19, 2011, 08:19:50 AM »
The 38 super, the 10mm amd the 9x23win surely sound more interesting now.  I don't know now.... ???  My wish list grows.  CZY

After shooting the tad more powerful 9mm largo(felt that way to me) along with the 9mm luger i kind of like the 9mm largo now better.  I have the orginal spanish largo ammo.  Its also a fun shooter too.

Offline williamlayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15415
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #26 on: June 19, 2011, 11:43:15 PM »
I have a lot of thoughts going thru my head right now.
2" groups at 25 yds--much less 50 yds--fall on my deaf ears. I can't do it.
Have considered--for a number of years now--a .45 from Ace Machine shop. It really doesn't hold that much interest for me though.
The same goes for the 10mm----I just can't get slobbered up over one.
The 9x23 is, too me, the easiest shooting and most fun reloading project there is. You can hop one up in a minute and it is FAST. Shooting factory loads is just pure butter.
I am having a S&W M586 in a 4inch barrel converted to shoot 9mm, .38 super & 9x23, as we speak. Really looking forward to this project coming home.
These guns are fun to do and to shoot.

1911---see, there ya go, trading the headaches of a day job for the headaches of a hobby. The Hobby is more fun, most of the time, but not without frustrations. I am actually concerned that we want to keep frustrations in our lives. Sometimes men are really stupid.
Blessings
 
TEXAS, by GOD

Offline chefjeff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 472
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #27 on: June 20, 2011, 04:18:08 PM »
In this anniversary of the 1911, there are many new players in the market. Look at several before you choose.......many good buys with lotsa features...

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #28 on: June 24, 2011, 07:33:18 AM »
Mikey;  Great post lots of history there too and ballastics.  Some are so close yet far apart too when we compare them.  I just shot the 9mm largo for the first time, i been too busy shooting the 9mm luger and 9mm mak most of the time.  But the 9mm largo is a fun round to shoot too. Its got some bark to it too. With shooting the 9mm luger and when the CZ82 in 9mm mak was offered as a C&R i grabbed one figuring it was way less power over the 9mm luger round. I was wrong because i can't see the difference between the two in shooting them side by side.  But now were talking about the upper end of the 9mm's power wise with the 38super, 9x23win and 9x25 dillon. Since there stretching the cases to 25mm i find it odd we haven't seen a 30 carbine round in a pistol yet?  I haven't heard of one yet. Or something in the lines of a 9mm magnum its all about the name too.

When we start looking for a new 1911 I feel like a kid in a candy store with $5 (candy isn't cheap anymore) and having so many choices with all of them now if i was new to the 1911 it would be even tougher to pick just one.  I still like the affordable springfield armory G.I. / Mil-Spec  and the Auto-Ordnance army WW2 copy 1911's and were talking around $600 + or -.  But there are new comers at even lower prices too like under $500.  The market nitch price wise seems to be between $500 to $1,200.  I think the highest numbers of the 1911's sell in this price range. The new Ruger SR1911 is right in this nitch too.  Maybe a few more good reports on the ruger would have more 1911 lovers thinking about it.  Its got some goddies on it and its in stainless.

Offline ratdog

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1000
Re: I'm torn between two new 1911's
« Reply #29 on: June 28, 2011, 03:50:11 PM »
i am happy with my springfield  45 auto stainless i also have a pt 1911 taurus in 9mm bought it because its cheaper to shoot .the spring field when i got it home and was cleaning it i noticed the frame was stamped brazil kinda ticked me of but the gun is totally reliable same to with the taurus not real pricey accurate enough for me.1911's they shoot any thing i feed them even my lead cast reloads.