for all you "long shot nay sayers" you really need to get out more. if you would like i will introduce you to a couple of my old friends in the military. they are called snipers. if you think 500 yards is a long shot at a deer, try 1400 meters at a human. now ask yourself, which one would be more important for a "one shot kill"? by todays standards. with todays equipment availability, 500 yards is like childs play in the hands of an experienced long range shooter. there is nothing wrong "ethically" by training yourself to make such shots. it isnt rocket science. just because you chose to limit your shots to shorter distances doesnt mean the long range guys are doing anything wrong. and it doesnt make you a a"better hunter" because you get closer. it just means you like to get closer. as a matter of fact, with the many long range snipers i know, i will pick them on a 600 yard deer over any average hunter at any distance including 100 yards or less. yes, i know, there is wind and all that. no kidding. you think those guys dont know that? do you think they dont know how to tell what the wind is doing? well that would make you wrong. they know all about wind and every other element affecting bullet trajectory. dont knock things you know nothing about. they call that closed minds. it really puts you at a disadvantage.
jeff
ps i will admit that ric's post sounded very arrogant. he doesnt represent all long range shooters. most of them are just like the rest of us, hunters. and i will admit that this post may sound a little arogant. but how do the negative posts sound? telling someone they are basically "stupid" for shooting at game at long range? sounds very arrogant to me. ours is a sport where 1. things get wounded and 2. things die, live with both or get out of the sport because like the bible, those 2 facts are the undisputed truth.