Author Topic: knight revolution (Read 1008 times)

little red · « **on:** December 18, 2003, 03:55:57 PM »

does anyone know what the new knight revolution will be like and when it will be available?

RandyWakeman · « **Reply #1 on:** December 18, 2003, 04:08:08 PM »

Last I heard, there were six protoypes being sent about. Two piece stock, and a pull-down action that uses red plastic jackets ( :eek: ) fired with a firing pin. The formal intro is supposed to be the Feb. Shot Show, I've not seen one-- but a few of those who have mentioned "Knight seems to have done a good job with it," whatever that might mean.

RandyWakeman · « **Reply #2 on:** December 25, 2003, 12:04:37 AM »

Triple Se7en · « **Reply #3 on:** December 25, 2003, 08:08:07 AM »

The strongest opinions I've read in ml/bp forums makes reference to the Knight Revolution's Butt-Ugliness.

I have read that even U.C's new screen name face over at HA.com looks more "motion picture appealing" than the new Revolution looks to future prospective buyers... lol.

Hang in there UC... somewhere in this world a knockout babe is dying to meet your "other hidden qualities"... ha-ha... he-he!

woodseye · « **Reply #4 on:** December 25, 2003, 09:28:14 AM »

I guess its the kind of thing that would grow on you......the guns looks I mean :eek:

Quote

Hang in there UC... somewhere in this world a knockout babe is dying to meet your "other hidden qualities"... ha-ha... he-he!

She may also like crud rings..........who knows?

woods

Underclocked · « **Reply #5 on:** December 25, 2003, 02:13:09 PM »

T7, santa dude, why aren't you out making late deliveries? :-) Yous guyz need ta quit makin funna ma loooks.

Merry Christmas.

I think that guy in my pic IS better looking than that "Revolution". I thought I understood the meaning of their chosen name for the new model, but now I think it infers something about "rolling over".

big6x6 · « **Reply #6 on:** December 25, 2003, 02:27:26 PM »

I WOULD have liked a one-piece stock better. IF it will out-shoot an Omega, as easy to take down, and handles well, no one will care HOW it looks? Remember the Glock 17?

Flatland Hunter · « **Reply #7 on:** December 25, 2003, 02:48:54 PM »

That is an ugly ML... normally Knights look pretty good. It had better be a real shooter!! And why incorporate the FPJ into... other to make more money!!

doninva · « **Reply #8 on:** December 25, 2003, 03:38:12 PM »

YEA, lets not give the new Knight any chance. Lets bash it before anyone has ever held or shot one. Come on guys,lets bash it good. LONG LIVE THOMPSON CENTER ARMS. Have a good day. geez Don

RandyWakeman · « **Reply #9 on:** December 25, 2003, 04:22:23 PM »

Pretty is as pretty does . . .

Underclocked · « **Reply #10 on:** December 25, 2003, 06:33:02 PM »

That's surely still a prototype in the ad. Maybe if we holler enough they'll purty it up. Wonder what the weight will be... that's a pretty substantial looking chunk of metal.

I was hoping it would look more like a Browning Hi-Wall or a Ruger 1. On the plus side, that action would surely be easy to clean.

RandyWakeman · « **Reply #11 on:** December 25, 2003, 07:05:33 PM »

Who said anything about "ugly"?

Underclocked · « **Reply #12 on:** December 25, 2003, 07:16:58 PM »

Can't say I own anything like that unique piece of ? design - but you could, you know?