Author Topic: Blasting Powder versus Black Powder  (Read 670 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vacek

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 218
  • Gender: Male
  • Philippians Chapter 2
Blasting Powder versus Black Powder
« on: May 17, 2011, 02:50:21 PM »
Is there any real difference in composition?  Was blasting powder (DuPont) ever used in muzzle loading and in BP cartridges?  Curious minds want to know.

Offline mcwoodduck

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7983
  • Gender: Male
Re: Blasting Powder versus Black Powder
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2011, 03:07:11 PM »
I  am guessing, but I think grade.
black is in f grades for guns but the are some grades that look like pebbles and are used in fireworks and what a high  scool buddy uses in his cannons.
or blasting powder has nitro in it like dynomite and should not be used in a firearm.

Offline vacek

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 218
  • Gender: Male
  • Philippians Chapter 2
Re: Blasting Powder versus Black Powder
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2011, 06:39:15 PM »
Thanks, I am curious because on a DuPont internet site they talk about the patent for blasting powder was granted because DuPont used Chilean Sodium Nitrate instead of Indian Potassium Nitrate.  This made it more affordable since the USA was having to pay Britain a tax on the Indian Salt Peter. 

Offline Winter Hawk

  • Trade Count: (47)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1947
  • Gender: Male
Re: Blasting Powder versus Black Powder
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2011, 12:30:48 PM »
Back in the late 1960s I took my .45 underhammer rifle to a friend's house who was doing some experiments for mining with shaped charges.  He had ditching/stumping powder which we tried in the rifle.  It was VERY course, the grains were probably around 1/4" across.  From what I remember we had very limitted success....

-WH-
"All you need for happiness is a good gun, a good horse and a good wife." - D. Boone