Author Topic: S/N's associated with changes to the Contender  (Read 2072 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Incitatus

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 333
  • Gender: Male
S/N's associated with changes to the Contender
« on: May 22, 2011, 12:35:54 PM »
I'm attemptingto put together a document that includes a bunch of information about Contenders that is largely from this forum.  Stuff like screw sizes, grip differences between the Contender, G2 and Encore.  Differences between barrels that were made at different times.  Hopefully it will be useful.

In any event, I wanted to ask some questions.  First concerns the evolution of the Contender.

The major changes seem to revolve around the safety, rim/centerfire selection and the "Easy Open" feature.  I asm looking for dates/ serial numbers.  Are these the major changes?  Are there others that should be included?

Original Contender ... no safety, screw head  on hammer with a cutaway so that one must turn it so that the un-cutaway portion strikes the appropriate centerfire or rimfire firing pin.

Next generation: Hammer block safety using a transverse pin that extends a pin on the hammer face that prevents it from contacting the firing pin.  Same rim/centerfire selector

Next: Lever on top of hammer that has three positions (C Safe R).

Finally, the "easy open" modification occurred after the final safety change(?)

Dates?  S/N's associated with these changes?


First picture shows the half screwhead rim/centerfire selector along with the transverse pin that engages the safety.  Note the hole on the hammer face that contains the "safety pin"

Second picture shoes the integrated lever system.

All help, thoughts and observations would be appreciated.





NRA Life Member-Patron-Endowment-Benefactor

Offline Ladobe

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
Re: S/N's associated with changes to the Contender
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2011, 12:43:42 PM »
While some elements can be achieved, I have to say that many will fall under the mission impossible moniker.   One of those been there done that things on Contenders and TC’s traditional muzzleloaders. 

"This tape will self destruct in five seconds" pretty much summarizes your quest.
http://wildcalls2k.com/misc/PlayMe.mp3

Hopefully these random thoughts from years of experience trying to do the same will give you an idea of the can of worms you are opening.   Some "experts" will argue or debate them, but that’s nothing new from ACE's.

I was close friends with Ken French at Tim Pancurak at TC for many years and talked to them often about things like problems end users where having with some of their products, what the public wanted and in trying to gather production specifics from them - both on the phone and in many hours spent with them at SHOT shows.   I never could shake much of it out of them other than generalizations - they just didn't have the time to put it all together for me and didn't see a need for any of it to become public anyway.   While TC would still have all the information on the Contenders, G2's and Encore's, including the pre fire Contenders, lots of luck finding anybody at TC who would make the effort to dig it all out.   After the fire I stepped up my quest on the traditional muzzleloaders too because TC's records for them were lost in the fire.   That was an even bigger can of worms.   TC was pretty much a dry well on them, so what I did manage to piece together is speculative beyond what years what models and accessories for them became catalog items at best (I have a near complete set of TC catalogs for those years).    Serialization on the muzzies is speculative and just a best guess.   I took on the same challenge on CVA Mountain Rifles and picked up a bunch of their old catalogs as well, but it ended up with about the same results BTW.

So I spent years trying to piece it all together myself from all the TC Contenders and muzzleloaders I had owned (a lot of them and I still have the records for them) and with the help of the good folks on TC specific forums at several sites.   While I achieved some success and have assembled a fair data base, it is far from complete and never will be on either the Contenders or the muzzleloaders.   And, most of it remains speculative.

Contender frames went through many design changes before the so called easy open vintage that presumably started in 1981 (approx #195,000), and they went through some more changes after that and before they were discontinued.   The last major one I am aware of was the renewable lower breech block in about 1997-98 soon before they were discontinued.   Same with the Contender barrels, especially the octagon's.   Lots of variations of them, just listing all the variations would be a task and putting all of them into anything but a general time frame would be hard to certify.

While Contender serialization by half year production has been charted for years, they are not etched in stone.   And much of the data from any of the good folks here will not be either.   Even those who bought new and still have a dated receipt to prove the date will just be ball park because who knows how long a frame sat in stock at TC, a jobber or a dealer before being sold.   Memory is a fine thing, but when trying to piece together fact it can not be trusted at all.   I had many examples where people insisted they remembered for sure… and the date given was years before a model was produced or even before TC was a company.   So asking for data can and will lead you to problems with folks who will be offended that you don’t believe them no matter how polite you are about it.   

All is not lost though.   Between the serial number charts and what a person has currently in hand to identify from, by a frames serial number you could start assembling a ball park idea of design range years though if you could obtain enough data for dozens/hundreds of frames from each of the exact same designs.    But you are looking at years to come up with enough data to be credible at all, will never fill in all the gaps and at best just come up with a general era when some of each were produced.

Were these quests worth my efforts?   Yes, because even though I had been a serious user of Contenders since 1968 and the ML’s from 1970, I learned a lot I either hadn’t thought much about or recognized at the times I had them for many of the early years.   Can I certify anything from my efforts?   Some yes, but not much… what was in the catalogs yes, everything else is open to speculation and ball park at best.   So the data is mainly for my use to avoid the heated debates and arguments on-line.

HTH - FWIW - YMMV

L.


 
Evolution at work. Over two million years ago the genus Homo had small cranial capacity and thick skin to protect them from their environment. One species has evolved into obese cranial fatheads with thin skin in comparison that whines about anything and everything as their shield against their environment. Meus

Offline Curtis

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (65)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1131
Re: S/N's associated with changes to the Contender
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2011, 02:50:08 PM »
Here is some barrel info I copied years ago from the web.  I would like to credit the original author, but all I know is it came from "Ron".  Maybe Lodobe knows who this information may have come from.

Quote
Barrel designations
T-1 Octagon, One line address, flat base, set screw, short site. 6 caliber's T/C Arms Rochester N.H. Caliber (There are variations also)1967

Pre Type 2, but not Type 1 has the N.H. BUT the caliber is located at the muzzle end

T-2 Octagon, 2 line address, flat base, set screw, significant
identification is a period after the N.H. This type has the largest caliber selection and dates 1967-1972

T-3 Octagon, 2 line address, flat base, set screw, now the period is only after the H. NOT THE N 1973-1975 (bull barrels also found is this vintage)

T-4 Octagon, 2 line address, flat base, set screw is replaced with a roll pin to hold in locking lug. (bull barrels and 14" found in this vintage)

T-5 Octagon or bull the significant change is the flat base that now has a step on it..if you check any of you 14" barrels it will have this step..

Now with in each of the above there are variations that mainly address sites.Sites are another classification in there own right. For those of you shooters out there T-1 - T-4 typically have the solid locking lug, which generally require changing to use on the newer frames,easy open started at serial # 195,000 .

T-6 thru T-9 are current variation that describe hunter barrels, stainless, 16", 21" scope models and so on. Unofficially I have deemed the T-9 indicating the newest rear site as used on the Encore and post-fire Contenders.once we clearly sort through the 6 thru 8s this may change again. One thing for for sure as a collector of TC's..just when you think you have it figured out....something else jumps up and changes every thing.
Good shooting and collecting,
Ron

HTH,
Curtis
Lord, please help me to be half the man my dogs think I am.

Contender in 17 Rem, 22lr, 22k Hornet, 223 Rem, 256 WM, 6TCU, 7TCU, 7-30, 30 Herrett, 300 Whisper, 30-30 AI, 357 mag, 357 Herrett, 375 JDJ, 44 mag, 45/410..... so far.

Offline Ladobe

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
Re: S/N's associated with changes to the Contender
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2011, 11:19:58 PM »
Curtis,

Yep, Ron Sable (Nazareth, PA) put that basic list together years ago, mainly as a simple system to subtype the Contender 10" octagon barrels in general.   As he says It doesn't take into account the various sights or other known variations on these barrels.   That includes not clarifying the specs or where the other lengths of octagon barrels made by TC fit in.   Even so the list is commonly referred to by TC collectors, and some dealers.

Ladobe
Evolution at work. Over two million years ago the genus Homo had small cranial capacity and thick skin to protect them from their environment. One species has evolved into obese cranial fatheads with thin skin in comparison that whines about anything and everything as their shield against their environment. Meus

Offline Steelbanger

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 379
Re: S/N's associated with changes to the Contender
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2011, 01:51:49 AM »
If memory serves me, I would seem to remember that the easy open feature and the pivoting firing pin selector on top of the hammer were introduced at the same time, early 80's. My first Contender was an older model which almost took two people to open and on top of that it was a 44 Mag which recoiled like no other handgun I have ever fired. So between recoil and squeezing that trigger guard so tightly to open it my hands were really sore after a shooting session. When the easy open models were introduced I may have been the first in line to get one. What a difference! Didn't take me long to trade off the first Contender.
"He who has gone, so we but cherish his memory, abides with us, more potent, nay, more present, than the living man."
Antoine de Saint-Expuéry

Steelbanger, NRA Life

Marlin - a hard habit to break.

Offline Hopalong7

  • Trade Count: (20)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1673
  • Gender: Male
Re: S/N's associated with changes to the Contender
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2011, 02:46:26 AM »
     My memory gets me in nothing but trouble....but...I believe my third frame was my first easy open and it still had the screw selector in the hammer ??? ::).  There again, that's only from memory and could well be(and usually is) wrong :o.
Walt