The reason for my post.

[kinslayer1965]

To all who care to read this,

My intentions with the post I have made over the last few days is to point out that with very little time and effort I found answers to many of the smoking guns of the conspiracy people.

I still have no idea why the inforation that I find on the webb is somehow less authoritative that the stuff you conspiracy guys put forth on a daily basis. Some of the things that are posted just seem down right silly to me but I still tried to put forth an alternate opinion. One post stated that air cannot hurl a 10 ton beam across so many hundreds of feet of space (not an exact quote I know). Well I found that funny because air lifts the Antonov AN-225 (worlds heaviest aircraft according to Wikipedia) into the sky and they can weigh up to 1,410,000 lbs. Some one post a comment that they are a pilot and found nothing extraordinary about the planes maneuvering that fatefull day and someone replies "not according to the Pilots for Truth". Well i went to their webbsite and they have Approximately 275 members listed by name from several different countries. I then go to Wikipedia and fin out that as of 2009 the were 594,285 pilots holding FAA certification just in the United States. That works out to a whopping 00.05%. And that is if you assume that all members were US pilots which they weren't. Another person said cell phones didn't work at 30,000 feet......well if they don't work why do they make you turn them off? Also last time I checked you have to descend from 30,000 feet to hit a building so maybe they work at 25,000.

I hope it does not offend anybody if I continue to post alternate material and opinion. Also about the cut and past thing....if there is a better way please let me know I have never claimed to be computer savvy.

CR

[Lost Farmboy]

All you proved is that you can cut and past a lot of information in a short time if it fits your preconceived idea.  You could not have possibility researched one single topic you posted in such a short time.  It took me over 2 years of research to make up my mind.  My focus was on two subjects, building 7 and the pools of molten metal.  I should have included a third, the Pentagon.   

Kinslayer I have a challenge for you.  I want to see how fast you can cut and paste a bunch of disinfo about the BBC reporter standing in front of building 7 reporting that it fell down 10 minuets too soon.

[kinslayer1965]

TM7 thanks for the polite and contructive criticism on the cut and past thing. I had been posting links but when I tried to review them for some reason they did not work. As I said before I am not very computer savy.

As to your question as to who benifitted most from 9/11 I don't have a ready answer for that one but will do some research and thinking and get back to you.

I still scratch my head and wonder why the info that I have posted fails the credibility test and the info that others post which supports the other side of the issue is "bullet proof" But it appears that question will never be answered.

Lost Farmboy.....if you had done a little research you would have found out that I started posting about my "preconcieved ideas" back on 4/12/2009 a full year and one month and ten days before you registered with the forum on 5/22/2010. I have not been on the forum a lot lately as I have had some other things in my life taking up my time. I have tried to log in occasionally to check up on things. Things have slowed down so I am able to spend a little more time reading and posting which I enjoy. I am glad you have taken the time to research and formulate an opinion. If there is any of the information you have used to formulate your opinion you would like to post, I will be glad to read it as I have done with so many that TM7 has posted. It will not offend me in the least even if you "cut and paste". As to your "challenge" I will check into it and if I find any pertinate "disinfo" (why is yours info and mine disinfo?) I will be glad to post it.

cr

[Lost Farmboy]

I don't mind cut and paste.  I do it all the time.  I don't read many of TM7's post because they are just too long.  Post the link cut and past the part you agree with or disagree with and state why.  Posting huge amounts of information on many subjects in a short time without commenting on them leads me to believe you haven't read them or really thought about them.

The article on Molten Metal goes on and on picking at minor details and never mentions what I think are the two most important ones.  The reports from the firemen on the scene and the major news networks three weeks later.  This is either a very incomplete investigation or disinfo.  The great lengths the author goes through on minor details and avoids major witnesses like the firemen there and major news networks leads me to think disinfo.