Author Topic: hillary?  (Read 1261 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline briarpatch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Gender: Male
hillary?
« on: September 16, 2011, 07:03:43 PM »
Are we going to see hillary take over and run for the clown?
I see the news people are starting to throw this  crony-gate thing out there. That tells me the clown may be in for rough road. They also talk about how popular hillary is.
There are millions of fools out there. She would win.

Offline SwampThing762

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
Re: hillary?
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2011, 07:12:31 PM »
She has to split the black and latino vote, and try to win over the welfare trash.  HC has the independents and people with jobs.

Fellow conservatives, we should initiate Operation Liberal Chaos  -- talk up Hillary to all liberals so that there are fewer votes for the Obamination.

ST762
We learned the true nature of Islam on 11 Sept 2001.

Show your appreciation for Islam....eat more bacon.

"Non nobis Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam." (Not to us Lord, not us, but to your name give the glory)  -- Knights Templar motto

Offline us920669

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: hillary?
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2011, 08:57:14 AM »
I hadn't seen this post yesterday when I put something under "Pass This Bill Right Away".  The Washington Post had a front page story about a book called "Confidence Men: Wall Street, Washington and the Education of a President", that paints a pretty unflattering picture of BHO.  Basically, he is just over his head and becomes putty in the hands of whoever can get to him.  I got to read the story carefully, and following it to the back pages, the ex-staffers who were dishing out the dirt back-peddled a little, saying they still support Obama and so forth, but none of them flat out denied making the statements attributed to them.  This article doesn't mention Hillary at all, but no matter how you slice it, it doesn't reflect very well on Obama.  This is significant, as Beltway liberals and RINOs take their marching orders from the Washington Post.

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: hillary?
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2011, 10:56:33 AM »
 IMO, the scariest part of Hillary is Slick Willy at her side.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31268
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2011, 11:02:49 AM »
There is a force behind her..  There are still cretins who want a Clinton dynasty and some of the media are now trying to place her in the catbird seat..    No surprise there !
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline crustylicious

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 697
  • Reading is fundamental, comprehension optional!
Re: hillary?
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2011, 01:29:36 PM »
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so sure of themselves, and the wiser people so full of doubts." Bertrand Russell
"The speaking in perpetual hyperbole is comely in nothing but love" Francis Bacon, Sr.
Voting is like driving a car- choose (D) to go forward- choose (R) to go backwards!
When all think alike, no one thinks very much. Albert Einstein

Offline lakota

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3472
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2011, 01:46:06 PM »
I would take her over Obama. At least we know beyond a reasonable doubt that she wasnt born in a grass hut out in Kenya somewhere.
Hi NSA! Can you see how many fingers I am holding up?

Offline nomosendero

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5760
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2011, 04:05:19 PM »
I would take her over Obama. At least we know beyond a reasonable doubt that she wasnt born in a grass hut out in Kenya somewhere.

She would continue his work. She is much more a Marxist than her husband (actually political/business partner) & is an equal to Obummer & nobody hates guns more.
You will not make peace with the Bluecoats, you are free to go.

Offline lakota

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3472
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2011, 04:19:45 PM »
I would take her over Obama. At least we know beyond a reasonable doubt that she wasnt born in a grass hut out in Kenya somewhere.

She would continue his work. She is much more a Marxist than her husband (actually political/business partner) & is an equal to Obummer & nobody hates guns more.

Given a choice I would prefer neither of them.
Hi NSA! Can you see how many fingers I am holding up?

Offline briarpatch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2011, 04:25:43 PM »
It will take a liberal in the presidents seat to keep what the clown has done for the elite going.--- Illegal, so called healthcare,  tarp, ETC.
If the clown cant make it they need someone who can and I believe they are looking at hillary. If a liberal is elected the elite will continue to reap huge benefit from the backs of taxpayers.

Offline nomosendero

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5760
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2011, 04:29:49 PM »
I would take her over Obama. At least we know beyond a reasonable doubt that she wasnt born in a grass hut out in Kenya somewhere.

She would continue his work. She is much more a Marxist than her husband (actually political/business partner) & is an equal to Obummer & nobody hates guns more.

Given a choice I would prefer neither of them.

Well, we will have a choice unless the Bolsheviks (Dems) take over before election. That's what Obummer sounds like with all this class warfare talk, it sure worked in 1917.
 
So anyway, since we have a choice it is a mute point.
You will not make peace with the Bluecoats, you are free to go.

Offline sidewinder319

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 634
Re: hillary?
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2011, 05:52:59 PM »
The American left is desperate. Obama is a total failure. They are down to the socialist class warefare propaganda. They reply racist and tax the rich regardless of the question. The radical hidden rich leaders of the labor unions are becoming very militant. The unions know that they are dieing and no one cares.  The leaders of the Democratic party are whispering behind Obamas back. They are whispering offer the people Hillery Clinton. They will have to ask Obama to fall on his sword in order to save the socialist movement in America. I think I can hear Obama pulling his sword, listen. ???

Offline OldSchoolRanger

  • Trade Count: (60)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2742
Re: hillary?
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2011, 06:56:47 PM »
sidewinder319 - Don't hold your breath, it will never happen! The only reason that Obama will pull his sword is to kill anyone that tries to take away his gig.  The man doesn't care about our country, or his party, he only cares for himself.
"You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts." - Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan

When you allow a lie to go unchallenged, it becomes the truth.

My quandary, I personally, don't think I have enough Handi's but, I know I have more Handi's than I really need or should have.

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31268
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #13 on: September 19, 2011, 02:25:13 AM »
I would take her over Obama. At least we know beyond a reasonable doubt that she wasnt born in a grass hut out in Kenya somewhere.

She would continue his work. She is much more a Marxist than her husband (actually political/business partner) & is an equal to Obummer & nobody hates guns more.

Given a choice I would prefer neither of them.
********************************************************************************
   Given a choice, I would prefer a snapping turtle....
****************************************************
 
  I think Sidewinder has it right.  There is a core of the totally robotic lefties who would like to put Hitlery in the oval office. 
   They have had what brains what brains they ever possessed..beaten in by Obama..but Hitlery hasn't had the opportunity to do the same yet...and they want to give it to her.  ...Don't expect the Loonie Left to ever really learn !
   
      Will the 'community activist' step aside for her... who knows ?  Will a total narcissist play 2nd ..or 3rd..or 5th, fiddle ?
     
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline magooch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6640
Re: hillary?
« Reply #14 on: September 19, 2011, 05:01:01 AM »
If the Republicans can't beat either one of those commies, this country is over.  Lock and load.
Swingem

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #15 on: September 20, 2011, 06:13:39 AM »
If the Republicans can't beat either one of those commies, this country is over.  Lock and load.
as first lady she tried her version of obama care and she is definitly anti-gun.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline lakota

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3472
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #16 on: September 20, 2011, 06:41:47 AM »
If the Republicans can't beat either one of those commies, this country is over.  Lock and load.

Sadly I think the lock and load option is the only way of getting this government to go back to the confines of the constitution regardless of who wins next year. There are just too many career politicians attached to the public teat
Hi NSA! Can you see how many fingers I am holding up?

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #17 on: September 20, 2011, 07:36:20 AM »
If the Republicans can't beat either one of those commies, this country is over.  Lock and load.

Sadly I think the lock and load option is the only way of getting this government to go back to the confines of the constitution regardless of who wins next year. There are just too many career politicians attached to the public teat
I'm in total agreement.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline RB Rooson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 330
  • Gender: Male
  • "If you come for mine, be sure to bring yours!"
    • http://www.ptca.00go.com
Re: hillary?
« Reply #18 on: September 20, 2011, 07:44:22 AM »
Let's have Hillary defeat BHO first in a Democratic Party Nomination....and then that he is out of the way, hopefully take her out with the Republican Canidate.
 
We just got to make the 'right choice' on the Republican....!!  Prayers up!! 
SASS #16974 - Duelist
SBSS # 1195 (O.G.B.) LXXIX
BOLD # 352

"Everyday I pray to be the man that my dog thinks I am!"

Offline Savage .250

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1714
Re: hillary?
« Reply #19 on: September 20, 2011, 11:01:35 AM »
Not in a million years could you trust that women!   
" The best part of the hunt is not the harvest but in the experience."

Offline Empty Quiver

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: hillary?
« Reply #20 on: September 20, 2011, 02:43:21 PM »
She would win a primary race.
**Concealed Carry...Because when seconds count help is only minutes away**

Offline sidewinder319

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 634
Re: hillary?
« Reply #21 on: September 20, 2011, 08:13:52 PM »
The Left is testing big toe in the water. James Carvall sent Obama an open letter calling him out.  Finestien has slapped him on the nose. Landru of La. has called his hand. Obamas numbers continue to fall among all groups except the Afro-Americans. They just released the numbers showing H Clintion as the most respected American politician. These things are not a chain of coincidences. If he continues to fail at his present embarrassing rate they will ask him to resign so H Clinton can run for president. He will yield to the party that invented him.  He was nothing when they found him and he knows they can return him to the same state of being. Liberals eat their young. ???

Offline magooch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6640
Re: hillary?
« Reply #22 on: September 21, 2011, 04:37:18 AM »
Wouldn't it be grand if total war broke out between the liberal factions?  Just wishful daydreaming.
Swingem

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: hillary?
« Reply #23 on: September 21, 2011, 07:10:54 AM »
When they kill their own it is done Off Stage.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline BW56

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 50
Re: hillary?
« Reply #24 on: September 21, 2011, 03:05:27 PM »
Sorry, i didn't like the way SHE ran the country through slick last time.

Offline Buck-Ridge

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 95
Re: hillary?
« Reply #25 on: September 21, 2011, 06:08:24 PM »
She is basically a carbon copy of Obama another Chicago Liberal except she can't give a speech worth a darn. She says ugh every third word.

Offline sidewinder319

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 634
Re: hillary?
« Reply #26 on: September 21, 2011, 06:34:16 PM »
Chapman a long time left wing Chicago reporter and Obama backer calls for Obama to back out. Chapman has told his readers that Truman and LBJ did the right thing by standing down. He is telling Obama the game is over. Chapmen is now backing H Clinton.  The storm clouds are gathering. Obama is involved in more corruption than Al Capone. He is a weak political hack that has been used by the left. He was elected by national guilt. He is insulated by racism. Problem is people are starving with losses in life savings jobs lost homes not seen in 80 years. The Socialist that feed on the American taxpayers must find another stalking horse. ???

Offline us920669

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: hillary?
« Reply #27 on: September 22, 2011, 05:35:24 AM »
An excellent post.  We can only hope that Hillary remains so arrogant and unattractive that she falls on her face again.

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31268
  • Gender: Male
Re: hillary?
« Reply #28 on: September 25, 2011, 01:27:58 AM »
Has anybody noticed Slick Willie lately...   He takes shots at Obama, while still praising Democrats in general.  He said trying to raise taxes and spend more is the WRONG thing to do during a recession.  (actually, wrong at any time)
  However, he claims hillery is the"ablest" politician out there.
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: hillary?
« Reply #29 on: September 25, 2011, 05:26:13 AM »
IMO, Hillary could get some of the dischanted black vote and a large chunk of the Latino vote. Most importantly I believe she would beat Obama getting the Jewish votes.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.