This forum really has slowed down.

[billy_56081]

It seems like whenever a hot topic starts to go against the grain of the liberals it gets locked. What gives, when the topic keeps a liberal slant it seems to go on forever,. Am I the only one who noticed this?

[powderman]

It seems like whenever a hot topic starts to go against the grain of the liberals it gets locked. What gives, when the topic keeps a liberal slant it seems to go on forever,. Am I the only one who noticed this?

 
BILLY. NOPE, you aren't the only one seeing this. POWDERMAN. 

[SwampThing762]

Billy, you are correct in your assessment.  It seems to be the liberals here opt to use the only tool with which they feel they win an argument.  But, that is just my opinion.

ST762

[yellowtail3]

Topics locked, because... it goes against the grain of liberals?
 
Doesn't seem very likely. Give an example or two?
 

[Graybeard]

I'm not aware of any liberals in a position to do that. Things mostly get locked around here because the participants refuse to follow the rules and begi name calling and making personl attacks.

Moderators get tired of warning folks over and over and deleting posts that don't comply with the rules and just lock it down. I do it at times myself.

[BUGEYE]

one very liberal mod will delete anything that makes his own claims seem insane. (which they usually are)

[Casull]

Wonder who that might be, Bugeye?      Although, truth be told it might not be the one I'm thinking about (different forum).  I've had a number of posts deleted today that did NOT involve name calling or being off topic.  I did however, make the mistake of pointing out the moderator's untruthfulness (is that ok, since I didn't call him/her a liar?).  I quoted him/her (in defense of my post, which he/she attacked) and pointed out where he/she changed words in quoting his/her own post.  Apparently, it is not within the rules to point out intentional acts of untruthfulness.  Oh well, guess I'll just stay clear of that sort of censorship (which is actually odd coming from someone who rails about such acts by the government).   

[BBF]

I would think if you have a legitimate complain that you have  recourse with the "MAN" or "SON"
Best of my knowledge a Moderator doesn't have tenure.

[powderman]

CASULL. I well know the forum and the mod. If you disagree with him/her your post will be deleted. He/she did that to several of my posts so I quit going to it's forum. He/she is king/ queen there. POWDERMAN. 

[Graybeard]

This forum has no moderator who is a liberal tho there is one many of you seem to think is a liberal because he tries to look at both sides of an issue and for some of you that is taken as being a liberal. That's about as far from reality as can be as liberals can only see there side of an issue same as many of you seem only able to see your side.

We have some pretty liberal posters but none who are moderators.

[BUGEYE]

Casull, I'm sure we are thinking of the same thing.

Graybeard, this forum is not what was talked about. NW and DUK do a pretty good job.
but I respectfully disagree about a liberal mod being at the SITE.  he whined to Matt and had me kicked out of his personal forum.  I have some very good info about airplanes since I spent 30 years with them but am not allowed to post it because it disagrees with his conspiracy theory.

[powderman]

Casull, I'm sure we are thinking of the same thing.

Graybeard, this forum is not what was talked about. NW and DUK do a pretty good job.
but I respectfully disagree about a liberal mod being at the SITE.  he whined to Matt and had me kicked out of his personal forum.  I have some very good info about airplanes since I spent 30 years with them but am not allowed to post it because it disagrees with his conspiracy theory.

 
BUGEYE. I'll have to put on my thinking cap to figure out who you are talking about, but thats why I quit posting there. POWDERMAN.