Author Topic: THE POW ISSUE  (Read 3860 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: THE POW ISSUE
« Reply #30 on: February 07, 2012, 10:04:31 AM »
We fought a war of defense.  They fought a war of aggression.  They had plenty and didn't have to starve our men but they did.

+1 (at least regarding the starving of prisoners)
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: THE POW ISSUE
« Reply #31 on: February 07, 2012, 10:29:24 AM »
It would seem that back in the day pow's were just locked away and who ever was charged with holding them forgotten. The system was over loaded and festered. I doubt that the system was ever constructed to handle the volume . Criminal yes but at the time no one cared. The the winner got away with it and the loser paid . The commanding officer at Andersonville got a rope party .
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline eastbank

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 401
Re: THE POW ISSUE
« Reply #32 on: February 08, 2012, 06:15:31 AM »
i think a lot of the guards and personel at the civil war prisons were unfit for front line service. capt. wertiz was wounded at seven pines and then put in charge at andersonville,so i don,t think they had the best men for the job and all prisoners suffered for it. eastbank. my seven(three were POW,s)relitives were members of the GAR,but i don,t think capt wertiz should have been hung. eastbank.

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: THE POW ISSUE
« Reply #33 on: February 08, 2012, 07:08:35 AM »
It is worth noting that the local towns people brought food and clothing to the prisioners at Andersonville.
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline Androclese

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: THE POW ISSUE
« Reply #34 on: October 29, 2012, 08:41:52 AM »
 Hello all, with respect to the issue of Prisoner exchanges between the U.S. and the C.S.A  There was indeed such a program, but it was stopped. I wrote this for another site, and will paste it here for whatever light it may shed on this thread.

"I had read that it was Lincoln, and Grant that stopped the exchanges due to Confederate refusal to treat all Union soldiers equally, (some mention of a massacre of Black soldiers was made.) I found this info which makes no mention of said mistreatment, but lays the blame on a few specific people.
In 1862 Representatives of each side met to arrange the format of exchanges, and how many of a particular rank were equal in value to higher officers etc.
Gen. John Dix (U.S.) and Gen. D.H. Hill (CSA) were these representatives.
In 1863 Gen. Henry Halleck (U.S.) became the representative in authority for the exchanges. He was pressured by Edwin Stanton then Secretary of War for the U.S. who proceeded to impede the program, and when Gen U.S. Grant was made the overall Commander of the Army the exchanges trickled away to nothing.(cut & paste follows)
General Benjamin F. Butler later said what Grant had told him: "He (Grant) said that I would agree with him that by the exchange of prisoners we get no men fit to go into our army, and every soldier we gave the Confederates went immediately into theirs, so that the exchange was virtually so much aid to them and none to us."

 This would account for the huge numbers of prisoners needing to be held in spaces never designed for such great numbers. Camp Sumter (Andersonville Prison) was designed for no more than 10,000, but eventually held as many as 30,000.  I have visited Andersonville, and the thought of 30K people being interned in this small space is appalling.