Author Topic: .45-70 vs. 416 Rigby  (Read 38791 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #30 on: July 29, 2005, 02:13:51 AM »
JJHACK, very well put.  :D
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline Larry Gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #31 on: July 30, 2005, 05:54:41 PM »
"Redhawk1"]JJHACK, very well put. "

Unfortunately VERY wrong, one should never say never.  JJHACK should not have referred to the cartridge alone; he should have stuck to the rifle/cartridge combination (Marlin levergun to be exact).

First of all while I may be inclined to shoot any and all sorts of plains game with my 45-70 I may also be inclined to take on cape buffalo. However I would no doubt end up in Africa with my M70 three six bits anyway so this may be a moot point. For the sake of argument let me point out a few facts; some of us 45-70 owners with delusions do not have Marlins. In my case I have a Siamese Mauser 45-70. My "conservative load" with a 400 gr Barnes runs at 2300 fps (Oehler M35P) and I can load it with no pressure problems to 2420 fps.

"The 45/70 is not a dangerous game rifle and does not have the needed power to be used on the bigger game in Africa in any kind of hunt other then a novelty or stunt."

While just a tad behind your .458 Lott (not really the subject of this thread by the way) my "conservative load" for the 45-70 is certainly in the same league as the .416s (400 gr bullets at 2300-2400 fps - excluding the WBY) and the .458 Win Mag along with a plethora of older double rifle cartridges. I can also push a 500/510 gr bullet to 2100 fps which is the match of the .458 Win Mag, with loads that I've chronographed anyway. Hardly a "novelty" or a "stunt" or a demonstration of .416s being "superior" as you state.  I also can push a 300 gr jacketed bullet to 2600 fps, hardly the case as you state in; " the only bullet the 45/70 can get that velocity with is a brittle solid hardcast lead bullet".

Given the ballistics available from my 45-70 and correct bullets I see no problem with buffalo, cape ones at that.  I always have the utmost respect for JJHACK’s opinions and observations but in this case he has made a blanket condemnation of the 45-70 that is not correct. those of us with correctly chambered and throated Siamese Mausers and Ruger #1s can play with the "big boys".

Larry Gibson

Offline leverfan

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 823
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #32 on: July 30, 2005, 09:20:58 PM »
LMG, Gemsbuck-

I'm willing to go ahead and accept the velocities you're claiming, at least for the sake of this debate.  My question becomes, "WHY??!!??"

What reloader in his or her right mind would take a .45-70 case that's much smaller than a .458 Winchester magnum, and try to make it produce velocities well in excess of anything the 458 can safely produce?  You know darn well that IF your velocity claims are correct, you're well beyond accepted pressure limits.  If you wanted a .458 Winchester, or a Lott, why the heck didn't you buy one?
NRA life member

Offline Larry Gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #33 on: July 31, 2005, 12:43:17 AM »
leverfan"

"I'm willing to go ahead and accept the velocities you're claiming, at least for the sake of this debate.  My question becomes, "WHY??!!??"

What reloader in his or her right mind would take a .45-70 case that's much smaller than a .458 Winchester magnum, and try to make it produce velocities well in excess of anything the 458 can safely produce?  You know darn well that IF your velocity claims are correct, you're well beyond accepted pressure limits.  If you wanted a .458 Winchester, or a Lott, why the heck didn't you buy one?[/quote]"

Grab a clue. I am not "produce(ing) velocities well in excess of anything the 458 can safely produce".  Since you obviously have no first hand experience in the matter let me explain; the fact is I come very close to equaling the velocities of the .458 Win and probably the pressures as well. I do not exceed them. You are making the same sort of irrational, emotional statements as JJHACK. What you should be doing is asking "how" I can practically duplicate .458 Win Mag velocities and pressures with the 45-70.

The answer is rather simple; throating. That's it. My Siamese Mauser and many Ruger #1s are throated long. If the bullet is seated out correctly the case capacity of the 45-70 is greatly increased and is very close to that of the .458 Win Mag.  My rifles chamber is throated specifically for the Barnes Original 400 gr SP when seated to magazine length. Case capacity is increased considerably over what is available to Marlin lever gun owners. As to safety you may want to consider that the Siamese Mauser and the Ruger #1 are quite stronger than the Marlin lever action and quite up the the safe pressures it takes to generate the velocities I mention. Or would you care to debate that?

To answer your question "why"; because I have the rifle and it can be done very safely. I have been doing it for years. I didn't, nor did anyone else, have any idea what the 45-70 was capable of in a Siamese Mauser action when I built mine (1974). I don't believe the Ruger #1 was available in that cartridge then nor was the "Lott" generally available or known of. There was not the plathora of .416 or other large bore rifles available then that there is today. So I built a bolt action large bore rifle I could afford at the time. Do you have another point?

Larry Gibson

Offline JJHACK

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 847
    • http://www.huntingadventures.net
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #34 on: July 31, 2005, 04:22:13 AM »
THe religious experience continues! Gather round and drink some of the Kool Aid to!  Imagine if Jim Jones had a 45/70!!

First the 45/70 can only achieve these velocities with a hard cast lead bullet, not a hunting bullet. If you cannot see that huge difference then your already to far gone!

Secondly have you tried this magic load with a shell laid in the sun to get it roasting hot? That's typical Africa. You too cliaimed that the 45/70 was at 2300fps with a 400 grain bullet, the lott is faster then that with a 500 grain bullet so how is that even close?

Since the 458win mag was originally a pathetic failure on most of the bigger game costing many people their lives and nearly killing Jack Lott the inventor of the 458 Lott, comparing the 45/70 to the original win mag loads is not gaining you any ground!

As I said before what happens to otherwise logical thinking people once they get a 45/70? Can you shoot a 400 grain swift Aframe or TBBC at 2400 fps? once the shells are roating hot? Not a chance! The 416 can with ease!
www.huntingadventures.net
jjhack@huntingadventures.net

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #35 on: July 31, 2005, 07:49:25 AM »
JJHACK, it is very difficult to make people understand logic. I am a 45-70 shooter also, but I know it's limitations. Even in my ruger #1 in 45-70, it does not come close to my 416 Rigby. How can one compare a case capacity of a 45-70 to a 416 Rigby.
55 gr. loads compared to the 416 Rigby 106 gr. of powder. If I wanted my 45-70 to shoot like a 458 Win Mag, then I would of bought a 458 Win Mag.  You guys are trying to make a 30-30 into a 300 Win Mag.  :-D  :-D
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline leverfan

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 823
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #36 on: July 31, 2005, 02:06:11 PM »
JJ-

You're right.  I wasted net space trying to bring logic to someone that obviously prefers another approach.

LMG-

Of course I don't want to debate with you.  If you've failed to learn civil discourse or common sense, and you also lack the ability to see that a post was addressing not only your loads, but also others on this thread, I will cede the argument to you rather than attempt to school you now.
NRA life member

Offline Larry Gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #37 on: July 31, 2005, 06:37:05 PM »
Well, looks like the boys have taken their football and gone home.

This thread was supposed to be a comparison of the 45-70 and the .416 Rigby. JJ made a blanket condemnation of the 45-70 and and threw in a comparison with the 458 Lott, a more powerful cartridge than the .416. He also mentions the 45-70 cannot equal the .458 (he brought it up not I). I have 30 years of experience loading the 45-70 in a Siamese Mauser. I know what it will and will not do. How much expereince does JJ and his sidekick Leverfan have? None no doubt, their comments are obviously pure speculation.

However all that is now moot. I stated before I have always respected JJ's opinions. That has now changed. His comments concerning other PHs and writers of past and current PHs on another thread speaks for JJs integrity. For me the straw that breaks the camels back is when JJ states; " have you tried this magic load with a shell laid in the sun to get it roasting hot?" No I have not and if he has, as he suggests I do, with a cartridge layed in the Sun then he has little integrity and I sincerely question his intelligence. I would not hire anyone who would suggest such a dangerous thing. If he suggests that then what knid af care will he take with his clients?

To answer the question; I have fired quite a few through the rifle with temperatures above 100 degrees with no problems. The cartridges were either in the magazine or loaded out of a pocket. I am not stupid enough to leave cartridges lying in the hot Sun and then shoot them. Apparently JJ is. Thus ends this conversation.

Larry Gibson

Offline JJHACK

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 847
    • http://www.huntingadventures.net
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #38 on: August 01, 2005, 04:35:37 AM »
LMG forgive me for not being more clear about this, but you might have wanted to read the whole thread. A poster going by the name Gemsbok posted that the 45/70 was nearly the equal to the 458 Lott. My posts were in response to his insanity.

As far as the comments about the sun, well you have really taken that way out if the intended context. My point was not that it was a design issue to lay the shells in the sun to cook them for added power, but rather that hunting in the heat of the African bush will add a tremendous level of problems to your already hot loads.

What kind of complete fool would ever suggest that heating up a cartridge is a "good idea". However if your magic loads work "just right" at 50-75 degrees with no pressure then what can you expect when they have been in the African bush cooking in that hot sunshine? Countless times I have gone to the truck to retrieve more ammo for a client and the inside of that truck is way into the 100 degree range. Wanna shoot one like that in your rifle?  What do you think will happen to those loads at 35C all day while walking the bush? Those shells are hot to the touch just riding in your shell belt!

You can make an attempt at degrading my opinions and trying to make a scene about my integrity. But for the record I have never lost a client, I have about a 25% rebook, and a 100% recomendation with just over 250 hunters in Africa over my career. I make no apology for my opinions. Take them or leave them but remember I work there and spend a whole lot of my life there seeing many hundreds of game shot each year.

After you have walked in my shoes and seen the kinds of hunting quantity and resolution of guns and ammo you come back and we can talk. I promise you your opinion will have been changed a whole lot!  I know that today my thoughts on all kinds of things hunting and firearm related are a lot different then they were 15 years ago when I began school there!  Not to mention the 15 plus years of annual experience in this business.

If your specialty "Siamese" mauser with the custom handloads and your hardcast bullets does what makes you happy then go for it. It's your pile of trophy fees not mine. But don't suggest that this is the proper tool for the job to the general public because it's not even in the game!

By the way can you point out the "current PH "I have degraded as you stated in your thread?
www.huntingadventures.net
jjhack@huntingadventures.net

Offline Larry Gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #39 on: August 01, 2005, 06:29:46 PM »
JJHACK

One last reply as I see no sense in carrying this further. It is you who should read the thread,particualarly what I wrote. I know who first mentioned the Lott but it is you who continued using it for comparison. The comparison was to be the 45-70 vs the .416 Rigby.  I have fired my loads in 100+ degree heat. Do you think I took them out of the cooler just before shooting them? No, they were in the rifle and in my left shirt pocket, Oh yeah and then I got some more out of the jeep which wasn't parked in an AC'd garage. My "hot loads" as you refer to them have already been tested in hot climates. Actually they were tested for that and proved ok before you took up schooling as a PH. They continue to be safe loads. Is that simple enough for you to understand?

"As far as the comments about the sun, well you have really taken that way out if the intended context."

Here is the "context"; "have you tried this magic load with a shell laid in the sun to get it roasting hot?" It is quite clear what you said and what you intended. Very bad form old boy.

A final note which demonstrates your lack of comprehending what you read; where did I mention "hard cast bullets" in my loads? You emphatically state; "First the 45/70 can only achieve these velocities with a hard cast lead bullet, not a hunting bullet. If you cannot see that huge difference then your already to far gone! "

I specifically mentioned the 400 gr Barnes Original SP which I drive at 2300 fps quite safely in 100+ temperatures. You might check with Barnes as to the composition of that bullet, they will set you straight. The 2300 fps also closely matches the factory ballistics of the 400 gr bullet in .416s. Let me regress a bit here; perhaps it is not comprehensin that you have problems with but simple you have taken a stand and do not want to be corrected. That is unfortunate for we should all want to learn more about cartridges, firearms and hunting from these exchanges. Aparently you've closed your mind to learning.

My original point here is you should not have made the blanket condemnation of the 45-70 cartridge. I pointed out the exceptions to your statements based on proven facts. You chose to disregard those facts not based on any experience you have with the 45-70 in such rifles as mine but based only on your opinion. Perhaps you should understand that the only shoes worthy of walking in are not yours alone. Others of us have considerable experience and knowledge also. Thank you for this conversation.

Larry Gibson

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #40 on: August 02, 2005, 12:43:59 AM »
LMG, you are comparing a hot "RELOAD" to a factory 416 Rigby. If you want to be fair in your comparison, look at the factory 45-70 to the factory 416 Rigby No comparison there. Now compare the reloaded 45-70 to a reloaded 416 Rigby. THERE IS NO COMPARISON. It is not a hard concept to grasp.
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline Larry Gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #41 on: August 02, 2005, 02:59:30 AM »
Quote from: Redhawk1
LMG, you are comparing a hot "RELOAD" to a factory 416 Rigby. If you want to be fair in your comparison, look at the factory 45-70 to the factory 416 Rigby No comparison there. Now compare the reloaded 45-70 to a reloaded 416 Rigby. THERE IS NO COMPARISON. It is not a hard concept to grasp.



Redhawk1

“Hello, I'm a Trad. bowhunter. I made my 1st trip to Africa for plains game in 2001. I hope to go back in 2004. I also enjoy shooting big bore handguns.
When I go back I'd like to hunt with my bow, Freedom Arms casull and a rifle.
I've be considering a Ruger 1 in either .45-70 or .416 Rigby.
The trip would be for plains game, and I really don't see myself hunting out past 100yrds.
How do these two cal. rounds compare?”

Above is the original post starting this discussion. It only ask to compare the two rounds. There is no mention of just comparing factory rounds.  Below is one of your first posts. You will note that you are mentioning the use of “loads” not factory rounds.  

“I have both a 45-70 and a 416 Rigby. The 45-70 loaded to the max and shot out of my Ruger #1 does not come close to the power of my 416 Rigby.”

This last post is typical of this pointless argument. You and JJHACK have consistently only argued throughout this thread. Some of us (gemsbock, msorenso and DanP) have tried to address the question with facts instead of opinions. Regardless of what you and JJHACK say the 45-70 has a very viable place in Africa for use on plains game. I don’t think the .458 Lott or a maxed out .416 let alone my heavy 45-70 loads are necessary nor even recommended for plains game by most professional PHs let alone used by hunters.  JJHACK concurs with that. By the way, I stand corrected; it was JJHACK who mentioned the .458 Lott first in this thread.  Boss Knogoni wanted to limit his shots to 100 yards or under and use open sights, apparently knowing his own limitations. Unfortunately we strayed to those “longer shot” capabilities. Can we get back to the original question?

Larry Gibson

Offline Larry Gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
Re: .45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #42 on: August 02, 2005, 03:08:31 AM »
Quote from: Boss Kongoni
Hello, I'm a Trad. bowhunter. I made my 1st trip to Africa for plains game in 2001. I hope to go back in 2004. I also enjoy shooting big bore handguns.
When I go back I'd like to hunt with my bow, Freedom Arms casull and a rifle.
I've be considering a Ruger 1 in either .45-70 or .416 Rigby.
The trip would be for plains game, and I really don't see myself hunting out past 100yrds.
How do these two cal. rounds compare?

Thank you.


Boss Kongoni

I would suggest you locate someone with one or both of these rifles. Ask if you may shoot a couple rounds (offer to pay for the ammo). Both have considerable recoil with ammo that is proper for plains game. You may be able to handle both but then you may not. As you are aware the 45-70 offers more choice of ammunition which has less recoil. All 45-70 ammo intended for deer or elk size animals will do nicely on plains game out to your specified 100 yards. I won't be back in country ( I am in Iraq) until January. If it's ok and you're out Tacoma, WA way give me a call. I'll gladly let you shoot a variety af 45-70 loads, no charge either. Good luck.

Larry Gibson

Offline JJHACK

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 847
    • http://www.huntingadventures.net
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #43 on: August 02, 2005, 03:38:35 AM »
For all the visitors and folks reading this lets put this whole thread into a little perspective.

Of all the 416 Rigbys built and used around the world today, all can achieve 2400-2500 FPS with factory loads using hunting qualtiy 400 grain bullets in a standard length barrel in roasting hot sunshiney weather.

There is one claim that an old  siamese rifle can achieve this with some magic load using about 1/2 the powder and the same bullet weight. safely I might add, even in 100 deg plus weather! Although living in Tacoma Washington there was probably not more then one 100 deg day in the last 50 years and even considering Eastern Wa. temps there are few and far between 100 plus days there as well.  Lets suppost that the wheel of fortune landed on a hundred degree day during his testing. So what we have here is the claim that one rifle and magic 1/2 capacity powder load drives a 400 grain bullet to 2400 fps.  I'm afraid this carnival act must have been done with some disregard for common safety. and should not be attempted by anyone with any common sense.

An interesting thought on this too. Al Arpin, Craig Boddington, Finn Aggard, Terry Wieland, and Gary Minton all say it cannot be done safely. Not just with common rifles but with some carnival act Siamese mauser either.  These folks whote a book together called "Any shot you want" It's a Book on Hunting rifles for serious hunters which address all the best rifles ever made for hunting and Reloading. It is packed with more information on Pressure and formulas and on and on. There has never been a book written like this that so thouroughly covers how things really work inside a rifle shell and what can be expected as a result of both factory and reloaded ammo. The text on pressure, and the engineering of rifles and shells is unsurpassed in any book written today on hunting rifles.  They did not miss a beat in this huge document. The graphs on pressure and temps and the graphs on pressure from hot loads compared to factory loads is just a work of art!

They started with the tiny .22 hornet and discuss every aspect of the cartridge and the various rifles and handloads that can be used in it.  They don't stop there either. Aside from the normal everyday cartridges used today there are some unusual cartridges that they examine completely for hunters and reloaders: 6mm PPC, .25 souper, 7.62X39 Russian, 300 pegasus, .338 excaliber, all the metric 9.3mm cartridges, .375JRS, 400 pondoro, .416 gerlach, .425 express, all the old doubles, up to 600 nitro express and even the 105X608mm too! As I said they did not miss anything regarding the hunting rifles of the world.  They discuss the best rifles and reloads that can be achieved with each one.

The 45/70 is not even in the book, it's not safe to tinker with!


Can you imagine the experience and test facilities these gentlemen have access to? Can you imagne the resources that they have at their fingertips? Al Arpin is a master gunsmith and inventer, that has an enormous shop and was the fella responsible for listing the 338/06 as a factory cartride with SAMMI. These folks are the real deal they are part of the core of American gun knowledge where firearms and hunting loads are concerned.

Yet in this huge book of guns with all the obscure cartridges they wrote about. .........There is one missing,........ not even mentioned in the book the 45/70.

Why is that? Did all of them forget it exists? Did the editors miss it? Was it a little joke they decided to play on LMG?

Do you folks know of a man named Ken Waters? He wrote the bible of all handloading and was the editor of Handloading Magazine. He has a two book set called "Pet Loads" which is a compilation of all the research of handloads done with about every cartridge made. This research was done using the most advanced pressure measurement equipment available and multiple Chronographs. Every concievable powder and bullet combination and rifles and handguns of many different makes and barrel lengths.

He lists loads for the Siamese Mauser and states directly that these loads should only be used in a Ruger #1 or a Siamese Mauser. NEVER in the Marlin!

Here are some spec's and quotes from his excellent book on the subject:

The Highest velocity load we tested was a 300 grain Hornady at 2228fps.
The Best we could get with the 350 grain Hornady was 2020fps.
Our Speer 400 grain bullet was at Maximum pressure at 2027fps and had poor accuracy. We managed 1972 FPS with another load and bullet but it too had very poor accuracy.  The poweders used were IMR 4198, 3031, and H4895 H4831 and many many more. No powder charge exceeded 57 grains.

Note here that the highest velocity load tested with the 45/70 in the dozen or so pages of test data published was 2228 FPS with a Siamese Mauser and only a 300 grain bullet. This by a recognised expert in the field who's testimony would stand up in court as an expert witness!

There is good reason, you cannot load a 400 grain or 500 grain bullet to hunt Dangerous game with in that old shell and get enough velocity to use it safely. Especially in the high southern African climate. The liabilty to anyone publishing hot loads with a 45/70, or the lack of responsibility to people who post this non-sense is absolutely off the charts bad behaviour and in very poor taste.

However as visitors you should be able to read the kinds of things that are possible even in the fantasy world of some posters. Maybe we should step back and be grateful that LMG has done this testing. He brought that old cartrige to the functional edge of it's limits and lived to tell about it. A true Pioneer. Like space travel, deep underwater exploration, land speed records, air shows, and medical experiments and testing all  being high risk so was LMG's testing of this cartridge.

Good job LMG, ............I do think you can get 2500 though, you really should push that envelope and see if you can squeeze in just a bit more powder, Use a shoe horn!
www.huntingadventures.net
jjhack@huntingadventures.net

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #44 on: August 02, 2005, 05:26:49 AM »
Quote from: JJHACK
For all the visitors and folks reading this lets put this whole thread into a little perspective.

Of all the 416 Rigbys built and used around the world today, all can achieve 2400-2500 FPS with factory loads using hunting qualtiy 400 grain bullets in a standard length barrel in roasting hot sunshiney weather.

There is one claim that an old  siamese rifle can achieve this with some magic load using about 1/2 the powder and the same bullet weight. safely I might add, even in 100 deg plus weather! Although living in Tacoma Washington there was probably not more then one 100 deg day in the last 50 years and even considering Eastern Wa. temps there are few and far between 100 plus days there as well.  Lets suppost that the wheel of fortune landed on a hundred degree day during his testing. So what we have here is the claim that one rifle and magic 1/2 capacity powder load drives a 400 grain bullet to 2400 fps.  I'm afraid this carnival act must have been done with some disregard for common safety. and should not be attempted by anyone with any common sense.

An interesting thought on this too. Al Arpin, Craig Boddington, Finn Aggard, Terry Wieland, and Gary Minton all say it cannot be done safely. Not just with common rifles but with some carnival act Siamese mauser either.  These folks whote a book together called "Any shot you want" It's a Book on Hunting rifles for serious hunters which address all the best rifles ever made for hunting and Reloading. It is packed with more information on Pressure and formulas and on and on. There has never been a book written like this that so thouroughly covers how things really work inside a rifle shell and what can be expected as a result of both factory and reloaded ammo. The text on pressure, and the engineering of rifles and shells is unsurpassed in any book written today on hunting rifles.  They did not miss a beat in this huge document. The graphs on pressure and temps and the graphs on pressure from hot loads compared to factory loads is just a work of art!

They started with the tiny .22 hornet and discuss every aspect of the cartridge and the various rifles and handloads that can be used in it.  They don't stop there either. Aside from the normal everyday cartridges used today there are some unusual cartridges that they examine completely for hunters and reloaders: 6mm PPC, .25 souper, 7.62X39 Russian, 300 pegasus, .338 excaliber, all the metric 9.3mm cartridges, .375JRS, 400 pondoro, .416 gerlach, .425 express, all the old doubles, up to 600 nitro express and even the 105X608mm too! As I said they did not miss anything regarding the hunting rifles of the world.  They discuss the best rifles and reloads that can be achieved with each one.

The 45/70 is not even in the book, it's not safe to tinker with!


Can you imagine the experience and test facilities these gentlemen have access to? Can you imagne the resources that they have at their fingertips? Al Arpin is a master gunsmith and inventer, that has an enormous shop and was the fella responsible for listing the 338/06 as a factory cartride with SAMMI. These folks are the real deal they are part of the core of American gun knowledge where firearms and hunting loads are concerned.

Yet in this huge book of guns with all the obscure cartridges they wrote about. .........There is one missing,........ not even mentioned in the book the 45/70.

Why is that? Did all of them forget it exists? Did the editors miss it? Was it a little joke they decided to play on LMG?

Do you folks know of a man named Ken Waters? He wrote the bible of all handloading and was the editor of Handloading Magazine. He has a two book set called "Pet Loads" which is a compilation of all the research of handloads done with about every cartridge made. This research was done using the most advanced pressure measurement equipment available and multiple Chronographs. Every concievable powder and bullet combination and rifles and handguns of many different makes and barrel lengths.

He lists loads for the Siamese Mauser and states directly that these loads should only be used in a Ruger #1 or a Siamese Mauser. NEVER in the Marlin!

Here are some spec's and quotes from his excellent book on the subject:

The Highest velocity load we tested was a 300 grain Hornady at 2228fps.
The Best we could get with the 350 grain Hornady was 2020fps.
Our Speer 400 grain bullet was at Maximum pressure at 2027fps and had poor accuracy. We managed 1972 FPS with another load and bullet but it too had very poor accuracy.  The poweders used were IMR 4198, 3031, and H4895 H4831 and many many more. No powder charge exceeded 57 grains.

Note here that the highest velocity load tested with the 45/70 in the dozen or so pages of test data published was 2228 FPS with a Siamese Mauser and only a 300 grain bullet. This by a recognised expert in the field who's testimony would stand up in court as an expert witness!

There is good reason, you cannot load a 400 grain or 500 grain bullet to hunt Dangerous game with in that old shell and get enough velocity to use it safely. Especially in the high southern African climate. The liabilty to anyone publishing hot loads with a 45/70, or the lack of responsibility to people who post this non-sense is absolutely off the charts bad behaviour and in very poor taste.

However as visitors you should be able to read the kinds of things that are possible even in the fantasy world of some posters. Maybe we should step back and be grateful that LMG has done this testing. He brought that old cartrige to the functional edge of it's limits and lived to tell about it. A true Pioneer. Like space travel, deep underwater exploration, land speed records, air shows, and medical experiments and testing all  being high risk so was LMG's testing of this cartridge.

Good job LMG, ............I do think you can get 2500 though, you really should push that envelope and see if you can squeeze in just a bit more powder, Use a shoe horn!


Very good post. Very informative and educating. But some times it does not matter what you say or the proof you have, someone thinks they know it all. Those are the guys that post the pic's of there blown up guns and said I got X fps before she blew.  :-D  :-D
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline Larry Gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #45 on: August 02, 2005, 08:53:39 PM »
JJHACK

Again you’re making assumptions based not on facts but on your opinions. It’s nice that you quote all sorts of books; I’ve read a couple of them by the way. However, you’ve not paid attention to me and you’ve misconstrued what you’ve read. I already explained how I accomplished a safe load by throating the chamber. As stated earlier this allows very close to the same case capacity as the .458 Win mag. I suppose you’ll be telling us now the .458 can’t achieve 2300 fps safely with a 400 gr bullet but the fact is it can and does.

You also erroneously assume all the testing was done in Tacoma, Washington as I stated I live there. You also go off on an asinine tirade about the weather conditions there. I did not say the load was developed there. I lived in Eastern Oregon when the load was developed and it was tested in the desert with temperatures over 100 degrees. If you don’t think it gets that hot in the western and southwestern deserts you should read the papers as of late. No I did not run a few simple tests and publish a book I’m not sure that just publishing a book is what makes you an expert or even knowledgeable. I do not claim to be such an expert but what I have is 30 years experience with this rifle in 45-70. I have been loading and chronographing those loads for the same 30 years. How much experience do you or all the experts have with this rifle, obviously none. The fact that they have not done what I have is meaningless as the rifles they used were not chambered as mine is. If they had throated a chamber on a Siamese Mauser with a 25” barrel as mine is they may have got to the same safe level as I. As I recall the one use of a Siamese actioned 45-70 mentioned was with the short barreled commercial rifle. They went with, and were restricted by, the factory chamber which had a very short throat. Throating to allow seating the bullet farther out increases case capacity, allows for heavier charges of powder and allows higher safe velocity in actions that allow it. That is understood by everyone; excuse me – almost everyone.

Your snide remarks concern the “arcane Siamese Mauser” are typical of the argumentative attitude you proffer. Do you really expect anyone to believe a 98 Mauser action is not strong enough to handle safe working pressures of a .458 Win Mag equivalent. Your remarks not withstanding, the Siamese action is quite capable of safely handling those high but safe pressures. For the sake of argument kindly show me in one of those books where your “experts” used 64 gr of RL7 under a 400 gr Barnes bullet seated to magazine length of the Siamese Mauser action. Pray tell what was the velocity? Not there is it? Now before you go off on another rant about how unsafe it is; unless you really, really know from first hand experience you should not show your ignorance.

I will offer this; when I return in January I will be at your disposal, or Leverfan’s, or Redhawk1s, or whoever you want to let them shoot the rifle and chronograph the loads. If you (they) are afraid or concerned about your (their) safety you (they) may observe from a safe distance and I will shoot the rifle. You (they) will then have first hand knowledge and learn the 45-70 in a correctly chambered Siamese Mauser will safely shoot a 400 gr bullet at 2300 fps, a 500 gr bullet at 2100 fps and a 350 gr bullet at 2500 fps. All of the said bullets will be jacketed bullets. All done with my rifle, my chronograph (Oehler 35P), my ammunition and at my expense. I will even buy lunch and we can all be friends.

The ball is in your court, are you up for the game?

Larry Gibson

Offline JJHACK

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 847
    • http://www.huntingadventures.net
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #46 on: August 03, 2005, 05:43:42 AM »
Saw this photo and felt it was very appropriate for this thread!



www.huntingadventures.net
jjhack@huntingadventures.net

Offline fe352v8

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 700
  • Gender: Male
  • Evolve or become extinct
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #47 on: August 03, 2005, 06:55:42 AM »
This tread brings to mind a line from the Red Green Show

distributed in the US by PBS, produced in Canada, but it's still a funny show.

"Remember any tool can be the right tool"

life is no joke but funny things happen

jon
life is no joke but funny things happen

jon

Offline leverfan

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 823
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #48 on: August 03, 2005, 08:40:03 PM »
Quote from: LMG
I will offer this; when I return in January I will be at your disposal, or Leverfan’s, or Redhawk1s, or whoever you want to let them shoot the rifle and chronograph the loads. If you (they) are afraid or concerned about your (their) safety you (they) may observe from a safe distance and I will shoot the rifle. You (they) will then have first hand knowledge and learn the 45-70 in a correctly chambered Siamese Mauser will safely shoot a 400 gr bullet at 2300 fps, a 500 gr bullet at 2100 fps and a 350 gr bullet at 2500 fps. All of the said bullets will be jacketed bullets. All done with my rifle, my chronograph (Oehler 35P), my ammunition and at my expense. I will even buy lunch and we can all be friends.
Larry Gibson


Larry-

I'm game for that, as long as you don't kick off any more posts with "grab a clue" or refer to me as a boy again.  If you've been reloading for as long as you say you have, you should be old enough to be past that.    

If you go back to my earlier post that you took exception to, perhaps I should have been clearer about whose loads I was the most concerned with.  The 2591 fps for a 420 grain bullet out of a Marlin '95 was the big red flag.  That's why the post wasn't addressed only to you.  Obviously, a Mauser is stronger.  2420 fps with a 400 grain Barnes out of your .45-70 does seem a bit fast, since, in my experience, it's hard to get 2400 fps out of most production .458 Winchester rifles with a 400 grain bullet.  If you seat bullets out in a .45-70 case, say about .38", depending on your choice of brands, you'll have the same case capacity that a 458 offers.  

You also explained why you use those loads, despite the availability of production rifles that can handle more powerful commercial ammo.  Fair enough.  What do you do about the reduced neck tension from the short section of bullet in the case, and the misplaced bullet cannelure?  Does the decreased bullet pull cause problems getting an efficient powder burn?  Do you have trouble with recoil pushing bullets deeper in the repeater, or is the bullet supported by a compressed powder charge during recoil?
NRA life member

Offline Larry Gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #49 on: August 04, 2005, 02:57:40 AM »
Leverfan

That sounds reasonable enough; I won’t open with “grab a clue” or say “the boys have taken their football… etc. as long as I don’t get responses like; “I wasted net space trying to bring logic to someone that obviously prefers another approach” or some of the more inane responses I received from JJHACK.

Perhaps we should be a little more reasonable in our approach with each other, we are indeed both old enough to be past that. You have asked some very sensible questions here. I will answer them. However, let me say one thing first; I did not give the load information out of concerns for safety. There are 3 levels of loads generally accepted for the 45-70. We both know there are those who will start with max loads or “suggested loads”.  I am leery of what those folks may do, I’m sure you understand. I believe with the way I’ve throated my rifle and with the knowledge of a couple other Siamese Mausers and Ruger #1s that are similarly throated and loaded for,  a fourth level of loadings exist. I am reluctant to publish such data even though it is safe in these rifles.

“The 2591 fps for a 420 grain bullet out of a Marlin '95 was the big red flag.”

That one slipped by me. That kind of velocity out of a Marlin would have brought a flag up for me also. Knowing how deep into the case 400 grain bullets must be seated to feed through a Marlin certainly doesn’t leave the case capacity for that kind of velocity. Not to mention the Marlin action will not take the pressures necessary to achieve 2591 fps with a 420 gr bullet. I’ll have to go back and research earlier posts on that one but I’d agree you’ve pegged it right.

To answer the questions:

“Obviously, a Mauser is stronger. 2420 fps with a 400 grain Barnes out of your .45-70 does seem a bit fast, since, in my experience, it's hard to get 2400 fps out of most production .458 Winchester rifles with a 400 grain bullet.”

The 2420 fps with the Barnes bullet was what I consider to be the “max” load. While it was safe at 70-80 degrees when developed I felt it would not be safe in the hotter temperatures. JJHACK was absolutely correct about max loads being safe when worked up but unsafe in 100+ degrees. I backed the load off and settled on the 2300 fps load (which duplicates factory .416 fps with 400 gr bullets) to keep it safe in the hotter temperatures. It did in fact prove safe and reliable in the hotter temps of the desert on several trips. I, unfortunately, did not think to take my chronograph with me and did not get the fps at the hotter temp.

“If you seat bullets out in a .45-70 case, say about .38", depending on your choice of brands, you'll have the same case capacity that a 458 offers.”

Correct. I do not have my reloading records over here but I think I think the .38" or so is pretty close. I also use once fire brass for these loads and just neck size them to where the bottom of the bullet is. This actually creates the illusion of a slightly bottlenecked case. There is also a slight increase in case capacity over FL sized cases.

“What do you do about the reduced neck tension from the short section of bullet in the case, and the misplaced bullet cannelure?”

I use a neck sizer that gives .005” neck tension. I use a Lyman M die with the mandrel turned down to just fit inside the neck sized case to put a slight flair to the case mouth. This is to facilitate seating.  I have a commercial cannelure tool to put a cannelure where needed on the bullet but have found a Lee factory crimp die to give excellent crimps.    

“Does the decreased bullet pull cause problems getting an efficient powder burn?”

I had initial concerns for that also. However they proved groundless. The ES and SDs for the loads are very good. Sorry, don’t have my records here or I’d give them to you.

“Do you have trouble with recoil pushing bullets deeper in the repeater, or is the bullet supported by a compressed powder charge during recoil?”

No. The rifle holds three in the magazine with one up the spout. I have left the bottom round in the magazine on several occasions and fired three rounds then topped the magazine with two more and fired those. The bullet of the bottom round did not move in the case and it’s velocity was in the spread with the others. The nose of the bullet was a little beat up but not enough to seriously affect the accuracy at 100 yards. The “max” load with the 400 gr Barnes bullet was compressed but with the 2300 fps load the powder comes right to the base of the bullet with very slight, if any, compression. I also use the cannelure tool to put a cannelure under the bullet on the loads I use for hunting. This is done prior to crimping and it really locks the bullet in place.

“You also explained why you use those loads, despite the availability of production rifles that can handle more powerful commercial ammo”

To further explain; I do have a M70 375 H&H and have shot and assisted in working up loads with numerous larger bores including several double rifles. I have been seriously eyeballing either the Ruger or Dakota in .416. And of course when I win the lottery a battery of Searcy doubles is a must! LOLs! As I said in my first post the 375 or perhaps the .416 would find it’s way to Africa with me. I keep the Siamese Mauser 45-70 (I call it a .450-400-70) because it is the first “big bore” I had and it is death on elk in pole patches.

That’s about it. Where are you located? I would like to get together when I get home.

Larry Gibson

Offline DanP

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 94
.45/70 unreasonably effective for what it is, but...
« Reply #50 on: August 04, 2005, 01:29:34 PM »
Even in its old bp loading, this round was unreasonably effective at long range, and is still used for long range target shooting.  Its projectiles penetrated (and still do) far more effectively than one would expect to credit such a low-energy round.

That said, it is not a stopper.

My feeling is that the .45/70 does not get credit for its substantial virtues.  Instead some folks praise it for things it does not do, and others discredit it altogether because of the silly things the first group says.

Dan

Offline GEMSBUCK

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 196
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #51 on: August 05, 2005, 02:46:18 PM »
1st allow me to apologize as I jumped in on this thread then because of work commitments have not been back for sometime.
 The original question that began this thread as I recall was pretty simple 45-70 vs 416.
My original reply as well as a few others was in regards to that. I still hold fast to those comments: a quality handload without any pressure signs using a 350-400 gr bullet is equal to a factory loaded 416. Though when one compares a handload 416 to a handloaded 45-70 the 45-70 pales.
 What is so hard to understand about that?
 Will the 45-70 using a 350 Gr Nosler Partion pushed at 1800FPS + kill any DG animal ....You bet it will at the normal ranges for DG shooting. Is that same bullet going to do it the same as a 375,416,458Lott..... YOU BET IT WILL. Is the 45-70 a stopper...I'd hate to bet my life on it!
 If I had only 1 rifle to hunt EVERY animal in Africa with it  I'd take a 30-06 with quality 220 gr bullets and kill everything that walk in that land!

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #52 on: August 06, 2005, 01:56:09 AM »
Quote from: GEMSBUCK

 If I had only 1 rifle to hunt EVERY animal in Africa with it  I'd take a 30-06 with quality 220 gr bullets and kill everything that walk in that land!



It is a good thing that Africa has a min limit on caliber. More people would get killed thinking a 30-06 will do it all.  :eek:  :shock:
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline GEMSBUCK

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 196
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #53 on: August 06, 2005, 05:08:43 AM »
Redhawk Tell you what you cough up the cash and I'll shoot anything ANYWHERE with a good 220 gr bullet in a 30-06 under 100 yds, even that Fla waterbuffalo you are going to pop this month will drop in his tracks at the crack!
 I can't begin to tell you the no. of 2000# bison killed with a lesser caliber/bullet and BP.
 There was a time the 350 mag was considered the best there was for lions, and buff!
Gemsbuck

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #54 on: August 06, 2005, 08:04:24 AM »
Quote from: GEMSBUCK
Redhawk Tell you what you cough up the cash and I'll shoot anything ANYWHERE with a good 220 gr bullet in a 30-06 under 100 yds, even that Fla waterbuffalo you are going to pop this month will drop in his tracks at the crack!
 I can't begin to tell you the no. of 2000# bison killed with a lesser caliber/bullet and BP.
 There was a time the 350 mag was considered the best there was for lions, and buff!
Gemsbuck


Why in the world would I cough up cash for you to prove a point.  It's your point to prove, not mine. I just know form experience to bring enough gun. Sure a lot of game has been taken with less, but does that make it the best choice????

You are very correct about the number of bison killed with lesser and BP.  But with that said, I am sure if today rounds were available in those day, the lesser rounds would not of been the round of choice.

We can go back and forth all day long on this and get nowhere. The fact remaining is, if you hunt dangerous game, at least have enough common since to carry a big enough gun to get the job done and if it goes bad, you have enough gun to end it quick.
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline GEMSBUCK

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 196
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #55 on: August 08, 2005, 01:16:11 AM »
you are welcome to your opinion as I am to mine. Some people think you need a 270 as a min. to kill a whitetail too, but each year bunches are killed with a 22-250..... dead is dead
 I have found bigger is better mindsets lead to poor shooting or taking unethical shots more often than not. Those experienced shooters whom use lighter calibers usually pick their shots an pass on less than ideal angles.....with that said, I shoot a S&W 500 wheeelgun and a 458 Lott just as often as I do my 223 and 357 mag,why.......it's fun!!

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #56 on: August 08, 2005, 01:40:20 AM »
Quote from: GEMSBUCK

 I have found bigger is better mindsets lead to poor shooting or taking unethical shots more often than not. Those experienced shooters whom use lighter calibers usually pick their shots an pass on less than ideal angles  quote]

I have to disagree with this part of your statement. I have found quit the difference. Most people that shoot Large bore guns, know how to handle them well, and are very experienced.

Being a bad shot and taking risky shots is not something a big bore shooter does. Most not all big bore shooters go after dangerous game, and know shot placement is key.

Big bore shooters don't make for bad shots, bad shooters make for bad shots.

I don't think I can bring anything else to this discussion.  :?
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline Larry Gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #57 on: August 08, 2005, 03:49:54 AM »
GEMSBUCK

“I have found bigger is better mind sets lead to poor shooting or taking unethical shots more often than not. Those experienced shooters whom use lighter calibers usually pick their shots an pass on less than ideal angles quote]”

I concur; to many times over to many years I have seen to many hunters with large bores or magnums which they can not shoot. One just needs to attend and help and any local range during “sight in day” before hunting season. It is bad enough when hunters show up with standard cartridge rifles and do not know how to shoot. Fortunately with a little marksmanship instruction they learn quickly, if they have the right attitude, and find they can shoot reasonably well with standard cartridges. On the other hand, many hunters show up with magnums, particularly the latest medium or large bore magnums if elk is on the menu. It is always very painful to watch these guys scrunch down on the bench in very poor form and get the snot knocked out of them. You have to let them get the snot knocked out before they will listen but many won’t. After all they are really men you know and besides the salesman said the new rifle in the latest ultra-magnum “didn’t kick bad at all”. After two or three shots they are really trying to line up the cross hair on the target just before they close their eyes, lift their head back off the stock and jerk the trigger.  There are woefully few bullet holes in the target if any. I have seen far too many magnum and large bore hunters who hit the target paper at 100 yards once, pack up their gear and say; “That’s close enough! I ain’t much on paper but I always get my elk! Besides these dang cartridges cost 30 dollars a box and I've shot half of em up! I remember buying 30-30s for a buck fifty a box. But hell, couldn't make no 1000 yard cross canyon shot with a thutty thuuty like ya can with this baby!" Yeah, right.

These big bore or magnum shooters would be far better served with a standard cartridge. A very small percentage of deer and elk or even African game are shot past 200 yards. Ask most any big game guide or PH and they will say the same thing. They will tell you that to many hunters show up with “too much gun” instead of using “enough gun”. The original question of this thread was about shooting plains game out to 100 yards and the 45-70 vs the .416 for just such a job. We are not talking dangerous game here. Most PHs will recommend the hunter bring a big game rifle which the hunter can shoot well. It does not have to be a magnum or a large bore. Many PHs consider the .375 H&H as “too much gun” for plains game simply because most hunters can’t shoot the magnum well and it really is not needed for plains game.  They, like most of us, have seen far to many hunters with magnums and big bores take bad and risky shots. There is nothing sanctimonious about being a big bore shooter. All it takes is money. Money does not buy ability, ethics or good judgment in the hunting fields be it here or in Africa. How many videos have we seen the last several years of very poor shooting by hunters with big bores…..far too many I’d say. Before we recommend big bores or magnums to all shooters we should make sure they are good shots. Redhawk1 had sage advice with; “Big bore shooters don't make for bad shots, bad shooters make for bad shots." He should remember that.

Ah, but there is the ambiance, the legend and lure of big bores, particularly where Africa is concerned. I got the impression the original poster had little experience shooting large bores. I am still of the opinion the Ruger #1 in 45-70 would have answered the question for him. Quite frankly the #1 in .416 would have knocked the snot out of him. There is but one level of factory load for him to choose. That ammo is very expensive also meaning he may not practice as much as needed to learn how not the get the snot knocked out of him. With a #1 in 45-70 he would have mild factory loads, medium factory loads and some pretty potent factory loads to choose from and practice with. The cost of 45-70 ammo compared to .416 ammo is also considerably less. Several of the factory 45-70 loads are entirely suitable for African plains game out to his stated limit of 100 yards. The original poster would be well served by the Ruger #1 in 45-70 for his intended purpose.

In many threads like this here and on the other forums we see questions like; ‘What is the best ammo to hunt deer with in my 6 inch barreled .357 magnum?” Do we get answers to the question? No we do not, we get pontification as in; “Get a .454.” “Wouldn’t use nothing less than the .480 Ruger with a 370 gr hard cast bullet.” etc. Or we’ll get a simple question like; “Which would you choose, the 7mm Remington Magnum or the 30-06?” And what do we get? An answer such as; “Neither, I use a .300 Magnum.”  Do any of these answers mean the .357 magnum will not kill deer? Does it mean the 7 mag and ’06 won’t kill game anymore either? Of course not, they have and they still will. These answers have little or nothing to do with the question. Some just seem to need to justify their own choice. I prefer that we answer the question. That is what I have to bring to this discussion.

Larry Gibson

Offline GEMSBUCK

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 196
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #58 on: August 08, 2005, 04:27:04 AM »
Larry you forgot: #1. father buys his 12 yr old son or daughter a  3" 12 ga to shoot duks/geese/turkeys then wonders why the kid developed a flinch or dislike for shooting. #2. How about ...why this here Nito express DBL rifle will blow right thru that thorn bush and bust both shoulders of cape buffalo.#3 (my favorite) the owner of one website (AR) frequently posts a picture of a cape buffalo shot direct center of the tail for the entrance wound with the bullet "driving" right up thru to the vitals....yep that's an ethical shot alright...one taken with a heavy DBL gun just to assure the buff doesn't charge I must assume. #4. why I paid $45K for this here DBL gun it is steeped in history but I really hate to waste ammo cause it costs so much ( as recently stated on Under Wild Skies by Tony Makrus)
 The fact has and ALWAYS will be.......shoot as heavy a caliber as you can ACCURATELY SHOOT!...end of discussion. Gemsbuck

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
.45-70 vs. 416 Rigby
« Reply #59 on: August 08, 2005, 06:37:28 AM »
LMG, GEMSBUCK both of you make general statements. If you personally cannot handle a big bore round, don't judge others that can. I have been shooting big bore guns for well over 20 years and I shoot them as well as any of my smaller bore guns. And I will say it again "Big bore shooters don't make for bad shots, bad shooters make for bad shots."  I have seen bad shooter no matter what they shoot.  The only difference between the big bore and small bore is the recoil, all the other preparation is exactly the same.

You both make poor examples of other shooters and should reserver your negative comments to those that apply, try not to lump all big bore shooters into one classification. Like I said before, there are even bad shots that shoot small bore guns.

You don't have to like big bores, and no one says you have to shoot them. But if you do go for big and even dangerous game some PH require them.
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA