The Repugnican Plan

[Junior1942]

As expected, the Repugnican revenue plan raises taxes on the middle class, not fat cats and Big Oil.   http://news.yahoo.com/gop-tax-plan-targets-itemized-deductions-080710390.html You guys should change parties and vote your own pocketbook, not Exxon-Mobil's.

[nw_hunter]

As expected, the Repugnican revenue plan raises taxes on the middle class, not fat cats and Big Oil.   http://news.yahoo.com/gop-tax-plan-targets-itemized-deductions-080710390.html You guys should change parties and vote your own pocketbook, not Exxon-Mobil's.

No need to change parties. We just need to vote in the right candidate, and if we do that we might actually have a pocketbook.

This very,very Liberal website gives us 10 reasons to vote for Ron Paul.
Well! Truth is, they said 10 reasons NOT to vote Paul, but she just worded it wrong.
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/11/04/10-reasons-not-to-vote-for-paul/

[lakota]

Yeah sounds like a good idea-I'll change parties and still lose my pocket book and get to lose all of my freedom as an added bonus. No thanks.

[BUGEYE]

As expected, the Repugnican revenue plan raises taxes on the middle class, not fat cats and Big Oil.   http://news.yahoo.com/gop-tax-plan-targets-itemized-deductions-080710390.html You guys should change parties and vote your own pocketbook, not Exxon-Mobil's.

No need to change parties. We just need to vote in the right candidate, and if we do that we might actually have a pocketbook.

This very,very Liberal website gives us 10 reasons to vote for Ron Paul.
Well! Truth is, they said 10 reasons NOT to vote Paul, but she just worded it wrong.
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/11/04/10-reasons-not-to-vote-for-paul/

there are 400,000,000 reasons to not vote for RP.  thats the amount he requested for his earmarks.  he gave over 10mil to the shrimp industry. shrimpers can sell every shrimp they dredge up. they don't need money to promote eating shrimp.  tell me he hasn't been bought just like any other politician.

http://www.azfree.org/ron-pauls-earmark-problem/
 

[Lost Farmboy]

 

The republican plan – Bankrupt America


The demarcate plan – Bankrupt America faster


The Ron Paul plan – Cut the budget by 1 trillion dollars the first year

[nw_hunter]

As expected, the Repugnican revenue plan raises taxes on the middle class, not fat cats and Big Oil.   http://news.yahoo.com/gop-tax-plan-targets-itemized-deductions-080710390.html You guys should change parties and vote your own pocketbook, not Exxon-Mobil's.

No need to change parties. We just need to vote in the right candidate, and if we do that we might actually have a pocketbook.

This very,very Liberal website gives us 10 reasons to vote for Ron Paul.
Well! Truth is, they said 10 reasons NOT to vote Paul, but she just worded it wrong.
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/11/04/10-reasons-not-to-vote-for-paul/

there are 400,000,000 reasons to not vote for RP.  thats the amount he requested for his earmarks.  he gave over 10mil to the shrimp industry. shrimpers can sell every shrimp they dredge up. they don't need money to promote eating shrimp.  tell me he hasn't been bought just like any other politician.

http://www.azfree.org/ron-pauls-earmark-problem/

Thanks for that very informative blog from Outside The Beltway.
I really never understood the importance of shrimp until the Forest Gump movie.

Yep! Old Paul is just like the other bottom feeders in DC and the media that speaks for them.. That's why they all have such respect for him. LOL!

[BUGEYE]

when congress spends a penny, it should benefit every citizen in the country.
I posted that link to show that RP is no different than any other politician.
he spends MY money on HIS constituents.

I knew that shrimp were tasty even before forest gump.

[Singleshotsam]

What I think people in general don't realize is that there is no magical political party, no Jesus like Presidential candidate, No local, state, or federal elected official that is going to do anything any differently than any previous power hungry politicians.  Most any politician is going to get a little drunk on their power.  No, I should restate that.  Most any politician is going to get a little drunk on the power their constituants allow them to abuse.  Until the people of this country wake up, make change in their own lives  such as, getting out of debt, living up to their own moral and religeous standards, and taking a very active role in the power you allow your elected officals have, then nothing, i repeat NOTHING is going to change.
 
As Larry Potterfield would say:  And that's the way it is.

[magooch]

Congratulations, sir.

[BBF]

As expected, the Repugnican revenue plan raises taxes on the middle class, not fat cats and Big Oil.   http://news.yahoo.com/gop-tax-plan-targets-itemized-deductions-080710390.html You guys should change parties and vote your own pocketbook, not Exxon-Mobil's.

The day I would vote Democrat/Liberal I will take an overdose or implant a lead pill into my head.

[BUGEYE]

As expected, the Repugnican revenue plan raises taxes on the middle class, not fat cats and Big Oil.   http://news.yahoo.com/gop-tax-plan-targets-itemized-deductions-080710390.html You guys should change parties and vote your own pocketbook, not Exxon-Mobil's.

The day I would vote Democrat/Liberal I will take an overdose or implant a lead pill into my head.

If you do, I wanna watch.

[ironglow]

Whjether REPUGNICAN  or DEMOCRAP ..makes no difference..  As Single shot Sam said...no Jesus waiting in the wings...only flawed men..some mildly so, others greatly so..   Our job next election is to see that somebody much less flawed that what we now have , gets the job.

[Junior1942]

As expected, the Repugnican revenue plan raises taxes on the middle class, not fat cats and Big Oil.   http://news.yahoo.com/gop-tax-plan-targets-itemized-deductions-080710390.html You guys should change parties and vote your own pocketbook, not Exxon-Mobil's.

The day I would vote Democrat/Liberal I will take an overdose or implant a lead pill into my head.

Be sure to smile toward Irving, Texas, when you pay your income taxes next year.  Be sure to say, Gosh, Exxon-Mobil, I'm glad to pay more US income taxes so you can keep paying none.  The middle class is about to get a $290,000,000,000 tax increase thanks to guys like you.

[lakota]

And if Obama is reelected hundreds of millions of people will face further needless and senseless restrictions on or the outright loss of their 2nd amendment rights-thanks to guys like you

[Junior1942]

And if Obama is reelected hundreds of millions of people will face further needless and senseless restrictions on or the outright loss of their 2nd amendment rights-thanks to guys like you

So there's no anti-gun Repugnicans?  BS.  GW Bush said he would sign an assault weapon ban if it crossed his desk.  I do believe he was/is a Repugnican.

[lakota]

I dont see many republicans actively campaigning to abolish my 2nd amendment rights the way that your beloved commiecrats do. Are you going to deny that disarmament is a part of the democrat platform?

[guzzijohn]

Quote from Lakota:
"And if Obama is reelected hundreds of millions of people will face further needless and senseless restrictions on or the outright loss of their 2nd amendment rights".


That is what many said would happen during his first term, hence the gun/ammo buying frenzy. Please list the 2nd amendment rights that have been removed due to Obama during his first term. If I remember correctly they have even been expanded like being able to carry in national parks.
GuzziJohn

[Junior1942]

I dont see many republicans actively campaigning to abolish my 2nd amendment rights the way that your beloved commiecrats do. Are you going to deny that disarmament is a part of the democrat platform?

SOME Democrats and SOME Republicans want it.  Don't paint every or even most Democrats with a Nancy Pelosi or Ted Kennedy brush. 
I told you guys several months ago that this Republican tax hike for the middle class was coming. You guys vote the way a billionaire would vote, not the way a middle class working man would vote if he wasn't blinded by prejudice and right wing spin.  You ARE going to pay more in US income taxes and Exxon and the other Big Oil Companies will continue to pay ZERO US income taxes.  John D. Rockefeller is laughing at you from his grave.

[mcwoodduck]

As expected, the Repugnican revenue plan raises taxes on the middle class, not fat cats and Big Oil.   http://news.yahoo.com/gop-tax-plan-targets-itemized-deductions-080710390.html You guys should change parties and vote your own pocketbook, not Exxon-Mobil's.

As usual the Media got the facts wrong.
The republican plan is to lower the tax rate to increase total dollar revinue.
There is an inverse relationship between tax rates and the amount of $ collected.
The lower the rate the more money is handed into the treasury as low tax rates create new jobs and business to tax.
Widening the tax base.

[jimster]

President Obama is anti gun, and will sign any anti gun legislation that gets to his desk.  That is a fact. And we all know it.  Just because legislation has not reached his desk yet is no reason to to feel all giddy. 

Hale DeMar, a 52-year-old Wilmette resident, was arrested and charged with
 misdemeanor violations for shooting, in the shoulder and leg, a burglar who
 broke into his home not once, but twice. Cook County prosecutors dropped all
 charges against DeMar.
In March 2004, the Illinois Senate passed Senate Bill 2165, a law introduced
 in response to DeMar's case, with provisions designed to assert a right of
 citizens to protect themselves against home invasions, such that self-defense
 requirements would be viewed to take precedence over local ordinances against
 handgun possession. The measure passed the Illinois Senate by a vote of 38-20.
 Barack Obama was one of the 20 state senators voting against the measure.

Obama’s writing was on the 1996 document, which was filed when Obama was running for the Illinois state Senate. A Chicago nonprofit, Independent Voters of Illinois, had this question, and Obama took hard line:
35. Do you support state legislation to:
a. ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns? Yes.
b. ban assault weapons? Yes.
c. mandatory waiting periods and background checks? Yes.

This is but a small sample of his view on us peasants.
 

[guzzijohn]

I was just saying it has not happened. I will reserve judgement for when it does happen. May soon have a chance to see if he tries to veto the national carry bill if it also goes through the senate.
GuzziJohn

[lakota]

If you think Obama wont go after gun rights in a second term then you are brainwashed to the point of being past hope.

[Junior1942]

As expected, the Repugnican revenue plan raises taxes on the middle class, not fat cats and Big Oil.   http://news.yahoo.com/gop-tax-plan-targets-itemized-deductions-080710390.html You guys should change parties and vote your own pocketbook, not Exxon-Mobil's.

As usual the Media got the facts wrong.
The republican plan is to lower the tax rate to increase total dollar revinue.
There is an inverse relationship between tax rates and the amount of $ collected.
The lower the rate the more money is handed into the treasury as low tax rates create new jobs and business to tax.
Widening the tax base.

Straight from The G.W. Bush playbook.  He kept cutting taxes for billionaires until he cut us almost to Great Depression #2.

[jimster]

I was just saying it has not happened. I will reserve judgement for when it does happen. May soon have a chance to see if he tries to veto the national carry bill if it also goes through the senate. GuzziJohn

Hope he does veto it to be honest...this bill is tied to commerce laws...not good.  But actually he is not smart enough to read the legislation or know much about it except the title of it.  Actually most people only look at the title of the bills...they don't know what's in them, let alone the inner workings of the legislation, or what it really means or how it will affect them.  Maybe I'll get lucky and he will veto it because of the title of it. Unless someone smarter than him fills him in on how the federal government can control state gun permits through this "great sounding" bill.   Any legislation from the feds needs to be carefully looked at.  Not to be trusted, might sound good on the surface, but it probably is not.     

[powderman]

Obama’s writing was on the 1996 document, which was filed when Obama was running for the Illinois state Senate. A Chicago nonprofit, Independent Voters of Illinois, had this question, and Obama took hard line:
35. Do you support state legislation to:
a. ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns? Yes.
b. ban assault weapons? Yes.
c. mandatory waiting periods and background checks? Yes.

This is but a small sample of his view on us peasants.
 

 
YEP. And some so called gun owners here  support him. POWDERMAN. 

[Junior1942]

Obama’s writing was on the 1996 document, which was filed when Obama was running for the Illinois state Senate. A Chicago nonprofit, Independent Voters of Illinois, had this question, and Obama took hard line:
35. Do you support state legislation to:
a. ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns? Yes.
b. ban assault weapons? Yes.
c. mandatory waiting periods and background checks? Yes.

This is but a small sample of his view on us peasants.
 

 
YEP. And some so called gun owners here  support him. POWDERMAN. 

If you're talking about me, I'm not a so called gun owner.  I AM a gun owner.  Please explain why you supported GW Bush when he was for "b" in your list.  I suspect he was also for "a" and "c."  Wasn't McCain for "b"?  Obviously, you can't trust Repugnican politicians. 

[mcwoodduck]

Obama’s writing was on the 1996 document, which was filed when Obama was running for the Illinois state Senate. A Chicago nonprofit, Independent Voters of Illinois, had this question, and Obama took hard line:
35. Do you support state legislation to:
a. ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns? Yes.
b. ban assault weapons? Yes.
c. mandatory waiting periods and background checks? Yes.

This is but a small sample of his view on us peasants.
 

 
YEP. And some so called gun owners here  support him. POWDERMAN. 

If you're talking about me, I'm not a so called gun owner.  I AM a gun owner.  Please explain why you supported GW Bush when he was for "b" in your list.  I suspect he was also for "a" and "c."  Wasn't McCain for "b"?  Obviously, you can't trust Repugnican politicians.

You're right that is why we need conservitive candidates not republicans that can be more liberal than some democrats. 
And while some Republicans are wishy washy about gun control. 
The Democratic platform is ANTI gun even though some of the democrats are pro gun.

[BBF]

.

The day I would vote Democrat/Liberal I will take an overdose or implant a lead pill into my head.

If you do, I wanna watch.

 
Don't hold your breath waiting.

[BBF]

I was just saying it has not happened. I will reserve judgement for when it does happen. May soon have a chance to see if he tries to veto the national carry bill if it also goes through the senate.
GuzziJohn

No worry there the Senate won't let it pass. Prince Harry and his clowns make sure that the WH doesn't have to show its hand.

[lakota]

I was just saying it has not happened. I will reserve judgement for when it does happen. May soon have a chance to see if he tries to veto the national carry bill if it also goes through the senate.
GuzziJohn

No worry there the Senate won't let it pass. Prince Harry and his clowns make sure that the WH doesn't have to show its hand.

Yep. Obama will wait to show his anti gun colors until after he has been reelected and is no longer accountable to the voters.