As I have noted on similar posts, I believe Ruger totally screwed up with their so-called Scout, by putting a stubby 16 inch barrel on it, and creating a 10 round mag that hangs down like a brick. A Scout is suppose to be a very handy, all purpose rifle, not a brush gun with a brick hanging underneath of it.
Three weeks ago, I was at Dawson's Gun Shop, which is a family owned gun store in Woodbridge, VA, a short distance from the Quantico Marine Base, and Fort Belvoir Army Base. There was a Ruger Scout sitting in the rack. I talked to the owner, and he said that it had been sitting there for 6 months.
He thought that due to the large number of military men in the area, he would sell the Ruger quickly. To his surprise, all of the Marines and Troopers that come in ask to see it, then handle it a bit, then pronounce it an odd piece of junk, and then hand it back to him. As far as I know, it is still sitting there.
It is hard to believe that Ruger screwed up the Scout rifle concept so completely. In dimension and firepower, it is basically just an Enfield Jungle Carbine in .308 instead of .303. Of course, the British were smart enought to have the front of the magazine shaped into a smooth angle, so that it wouldn't snag on anything. Not Ruger.
Like the Steyr Scout Rifle, these won't be made for long. They will end up being an odd collector's piece. Dont' waste your money.
Twenty five years from now, the spare magazines will be as rare as the rifles. So, if you want to make some money, just buy a stack of spare mags and put them in your gun locker.
Regards,
Mannyrock