Author Topic: Large blast heard in irans nuclear city. (Read 1183 times)

powderman · « **on:** November 29, 2011, 06:39:14 AM »

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/iran-nuclear-isfahan-blast/2011/11/28/id/419275#ixzz1f4Seubw8

Going to be interesting to see how this pans out. POWDERMAN.

magooch · « **Reply #1 on:** November 29, 2011, 04:47:38 PM »

Could it be that the Israelis have figured out how to cause some strategic explosions in Iran--accidently of course?

powderman · « **Reply #2 on:** November 29, 2011, 05:29:35 PM »

Quote from: magooch on November 29, 2011, 04:47:38 PM

Could it be that the Israelis have figured out how to cause some strategic explosions in Iran--accidently of course?

MAGOOCH. We can only hope. If it was Israel the head scum there would be too embarassed to admit it. POWDERMAN.

Singleshotsam · « **Reply #3 on:** November 29, 2011, 11:26:19 PM »

That's funny, my first thought on reading this was "Israel must have had enough!".

Shu · « **Reply #4 on:** November 30, 2011, 02:47:58 AM »

Best guess from some reports would be a large rocket motor exploding on a test stand. It is difficult to build a rocket large enough to travel a few thousand miles. Don't be suprised by the fact the rocket motors do blow up and the explosions often rival high explosive detonations.
If they ever get a warhead and a large enough rocket motor they will be a credile threat. Warheads and rockets are generaly a parallel effort.

magooch · « **Reply #5 on:** November 30, 2011, 04:12:58 AM »

Hasn't Israel vowed that they would never allow Iran, or any other Middle Eastern country to possess nukes? And didn't Israel take out Irak and Syria's nuclear installations? I don't think Israel makes idle threats.

Pat/Rick · « **Reply #6 on:** November 30, 2011, 06:50:55 AM »

More Israeli commando sharks?

powderman · « **Reply #7 on:** November 30, 2011, 07:06:04 AM »

Israel is the only nation over there that needs nukes. If they didn't have them their satan worshiping neighbors would have anhilated them many years ago. POWDERMAN.

BBF · « **Reply #8 on:** November 30, 2011, 09:14:42 AM »

Spies have a lower rank then thiefs in my book.

Hang 'em !!

BTW Is anbody here watching the TV Series called NCIS ??

blind ear · « **Reply #9 on:** November 30, 2011, 09:48:41 AM »

Quote from: scatterbrain on November 30, 2011, 09:14:42 AM

Spies have a lower rank then thiefs in my book.

Me to, unless they are my spies. ear

powderman · « **Reply #10 on:** November 30, 2011, 11:34:03 AM »

Quote from: blind ear on November 30, 2011, 09:48:41 AM

Quote from: scatterbrain on November 30, 2011, 09:14:42 AM
Spies have a lower rank then thiefs in my book.

Me to, unless they are my spies. ear

EAR, exactly, me too. POWDERMAN.

BBF · « **Reply #11 on:** December 01, 2011, 04:04:02 AM »

Then you shouldn't have any qualms when the "other" side does the same.

BTW I haven't heard/read just what those blasts were.

magooch · « **Reply #12 on:** December 02, 2011, 05:00:11 AM »

I would rather be overt about the whole thing. Tell Iran there is no way we're going to allow you to have a nuke. If they don't cease and desist, we demonstrate to them how to take down a nuclear project.

mdwest · « **Reply #13 on:** December 02, 2011, 05:37:58 AM »

Quote from: TM7 on December 02, 2011, 02:54:40 AM

If there were foreigners covertly operating in Iran to blow up stuff...that would fit the definiton of 'TERRORISM'....if caught these people could be detained indefinitely and never heard from again....by our rules, (or lack of rules)....doncha ya think...

..TM7

Actually, it wouldnt.. per US Law, Terrorism is defined as:

(From U.S. Code Title 22, Ch.38, Para. 2656f(d)

the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents

If the target is a nuclear weapons facility.. then it is an act of war.. not an act of terrorism (as defined by US code).. those are two very different things..

were the target a nuclear energy facility.. then it would fit the US governments definition of terrorism..

magooch · « **Reply #14 on:** December 02, 2011, 05:49:45 AM »

I would classify it as preventive maintenance.

powderman · « **Reply #15 on:** December 02, 2011, 06:34:27 AM »

Quote from: magooch on December 02, 2011, 05:49:45 AM

I would classify it as preventive maintenance.

BINGO, give that man a ceegar. Iran has bragged about them having the best missle defense and detection systems that russia can make. I've posted on another thread that Israel says it will not deny an attack. Yet, if true, there will be those who STILL refuse to see Gods hand on tiny ol Israel. I'm a firm believer in preventive maintenence. GOOOO IRARAEL. POWDERMAN.

BBF · « **Reply #16 on:** December 02, 2011, 09:13:46 AM »

Again, with that mindset you shouldn't be outraged if similar Preventive Maintenance is deployed on your soil.

powderman · « **Reply #17 on:** December 02, 2011, 11:58:33 AM »

Quote from: scatterbrain on December 02, 2011, 09:13:46 AM

Again, with that mindset you shouldn't be outraged if similar Preventive Maintenance is deployed on your soil.

scatter. Of course I'd be outraged, I'm still ticked over the cowardly attack on 9-11-01 by a bunch of subhuman, you know what scum screaming allah akhbar as they murdered 3000 innocents and sent themselves to hell. Like it or not you are involved too, they murdered folks in 18 different countries last month, we are in a GWOI, or global war on islam. You are either with them, or the rest of the world because we are all just targets to them. Canada is in danger from these scum too. I hope it was NOT an accidental explosion. Anybody tells me he's going to murder me and all my family, friends, and neighbors just as soon as he builds his rifle, I guarantee you that he would never get that rifle. POWDERMAN.

magooch · « **Reply #18 on:** December 03, 2011, 03:41:31 AM »

I'm still waiting for the exalted one (in his mind) to use his enormous powers of persuasion and statesmanship on the Iranians to get them to drop their nuclear ambitions. Oh, that's right, he's too busy campaigning around our 57 states to do the job he was elected to do.

no guns here · « **Reply #19 on:** December 03, 2011, 03:57:04 AM »

Quote

were the target a nuclear energy facility.. then it would fit the US governments definition of terrorism..

Not necessarily. A nuclear plant could be producing the energy to drive the other parts of the nuke program. Could be used to produce fuel for bombs. In that case it would be a valid military target.

NGH

mdwest · « **Reply #20 on:** December 03, 2011, 08:40:22 AM »

Quote from: TM7 on December 03, 2011, 04:55:14 AM

As far as the USA is concerned, wouldn't you have to have declared a war by Congress

The US has not formally declared war since WWII.. every engagement we have been involved in since the 1940's.. from Korea to El Salvador to Vietnam to Grenada, Somolia, GWI, GWOT, etc..etc.. congress has not declared war..

jlwilliams · « **Reply #21 on:** December 04, 2011, 03:43:03 AM »

Quote from: scatterbrain on December 01, 2011, 04:04:02 AM

Then you shouldn't have any qualms when the "other" side does the same.

BTW I haven't heard/read just what those blasts were.

I don't understand the idea that things whould be fair. No. That's childish. I think we should screw them at every oportunity and they should get whipped like dogs any time they try it to us. Play fair? No! Play unfair with the table tilted our way.

Get your head on straight. It's a war.

jlwilliams · « **Reply #22 on:** December 04, 2011, 03:45:49 AM »

Oh yeah. My guess is someone's last word was "OOPS!" Sometimes accidents happen and like was already said, building missiles and bombs is dangerous business. Maybe it was done to them, maybe they did it to themselves, or maybe it just happened. Luck is unpredictable.

magooch · « **Reply #23 on:** December 04, 2011, 04:16:11 AM »

jl, right you are. Our position on war should have just one rule: We win, you lose. Well, two rules: We only fight wars with the most efficient and destructive means at our disposal.

powderman · « **Reply #24 on:** December 04, 2011, 05:18:27 AM »

Quote

I don't understand the idea that things whould be fair. No. That's childish. I think we should screw them at every oportunity and they should get whipped like dogs any time they try it to us. Play fair? No! Play unfair with the table tilted our way.

Get your head on straight. It's a war.

JWILLIAMS. Good post Sir. Yes, we ARE in a war. Its islam against the world, aka global war on islam, or GWOI. POWDERMAN.