Considering the fact that it has a clause in it specificlly stating that US citizens are NOT allowed to be detained and that NO LAW passes by Congress supersedes the Constituition I'm having a hard time figuring out how anyone comes up with some of the rants I've heard and read about this law. It's intent (and wording) is to make it clear that enemy combatant terrorists caught in US soil are prisoners of war and are to be treated as such. Any attempt to say otherwise is not grounded in fact, legal basis, or US case law. This bill is solely to clarify to the ACLU that suing to get a foreign national in the US charged with terrorism in the US treated like a citizen is not going to be used as a stalling tactic anymore. Stick a fork in it, it's done.
