Author Topic: BSA "sweet" series  (Read 456 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31302
  • Gender: Male
BSA "sweet" series
« on: December 20, 2011, 11:48:42 PM »
  Are the sweet .17s and .22s any good ?  Do their trajectory settings work ?  Do they hold their zero ?
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline Ladobe

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
Re: BSA "sweet" series
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2011, 08:49:01 AM »
Can only offer a little on the Sweet 17's.   Never had one myself, but a pard bought one for one of his 17HMR's.   The times he came and hunted with me at much higher elevations than where he originally had set it up at home, he had to set it up again for elevation, or change his hold a little.   IOW, even the 17HMR gives enough extra velocity at 6-7000' higher elevations that for consistent head shots (on peekers) he had to compensate (one way or the other) at the longer ranges.  Wouldn't be a problem if shot closer to the elevation where it was set up though.   The 17HMR doesn't tax their strength, so no idea on that.   FWIW
 
 
Evolution at work. Over two million years ago the genus Homo had small cranial capacity and thick skin to protect them from their environment. One species has evolved into obese cranial fatheads with thin skin in comparison that whines about anything and everything as their shield against their environment. Meus

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31302
  • Gender: Male
Re: BSA "sweet" series
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2011, 12:23:31 AM »
Thanks Ladrobe..I was primarily interested in how it took the gaff of everyday use...
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)