Remember that the "most accurate" load in the factory test barrel does not mean a thing in your barrel. All guns are unique individuals. Also, there is never any indication of what "most accurate" means. Was it a difference of .001" over a 10 shot string? A 1" group versus a 3" one? What distance?
For what it is worth H4895 is likely the best choice on the planet for reduced loads. Hodgdon has tested it (and nothing else) for significantly reduced loads. You can load it down to 60% of the published maximum charge for any given load showing H4895 and still get uniform ignition and velocities.
The info is at
http://hodgdon.com/PDF/H4895%20Reduced%20Rifle%20Loads.pdfThere's an article on using it at
http://www.chuckhawks.com/reduced_recoil_H4895.htmMy experience has been that the velocity drop is generally pretty linear with the propellant drop. Cut and pasted below is the H4895 data for your bullet off the Hodgdon website. I hope it posts in alignment but you could cruise over to Hodgdon.com and get it yourself.
Bullet Weight (Gr.) Manufacturer Powder Bullet Diam. C.O.L. Grs. Vel. (ft/s) Pressure Grs. Vel. (ft/s) Pressure
150 GR. NOS BT Hodgdon H4895 .308" 2.800" 43.0 2742 43,200 CUP 45.5 2870 51,000 CUP
Your barrel is a little shorter than the standard .308 test barrel so it would be safe to assume your potential velocity is about 50 FPS or so less than the 2870 shown. In any case, each grain drop in charge equates to just about 50 FPS for this load. The max charge shows 45.5 grains and you want to loose 350 or so off of that. Pulling 7 grains off of the max and using 38.5 grain of H4895 will get you right in the ball park.
The minimum charge of around 29 grains would have you down to 1900-2000 FPS and still be consistent in terms of velocity. I don't know of any other powder that gives you that kind of flexibility, especially since H4895 can be used from 204 Ruger to 458 Win Mag and beyond.
Good Luck and happy hunting.
Lance